Posted on 04/04/2010 8:30:39 AM PDT by coffee260
This is so timely: And funny!!!
“The Evolution Interpreter: Generic Transition Form Fossil Discovery Article”
Over the years I’ve read copiously on the subject of origins. I’ve noticed the media pronouncements on the subject of new fossils and evolutionary theory form a startlingly repetitive pattern. To save the over-worked and increasingly bankrupt news media I’ve undertaken to serve them with a generic news story that can be copy-and-pasted with few modifications and reused as frequently as desired.
New Fossil Discovery Is Transition Form, Provides Proof of Evolution!
University of ________
Scientists say they’ve found a “missing link” in the early evolution of ______ – the skeleton of a ______ that was evolving away from ______ to _______. [Translation: They found something new, therefore it must have evolved by time + chance from something else.]
These _______ features were a new adaptation as the species evolved into ______. [Translation: If we imagine hard enough, anything is possible.]
Experts called it “a fantastic discovery” that fills a crucial gap in the fossil record. [Translation: Give us more $$$ for our Very Important Work.]
The ___ million-year-old creature was not a direct ancestor of today’s ______. It’s from a different branch. But it does show what an early direct ancestor looked like, said researcher [Translation: The headline is a big fat lie and once again we can’t actually find an actual ancestor of modern life that shows innovative evolutionary change, but please don’t notice that. We think this critter is _close enough_ for propaganda purposes.]
Dr. _______, a biology professor at ______ State University who wasn’t involved in the work, welcomed the find. [Translation: Can I use this to get more grant $$$ too?]
“This is a fantastic discovery that fills a critical evolutionary gap (from) when ______ traded _____ for ______ and moved from ______ to ______,” she wrote in an e-mail. [Translation: This Really Important Discovery demands more research funding. Hint, hint.]
Not all experts agreed. Professor _____ noted that an older fossil of the same type had been discovered in ______. [Translation: We pick and choose what evidence we like to focus on, and hope for the best.]
But _____, who didn’t participate in the paper, called the discovery exciting because it provides direct evidence for what early ________ in the _____-to-______ transition looked like. [Translation: I won’t rock the boat. By the way, give us more $$$.]
Overall, 100% of officially-sanctioned scientists said, the discovery was a tremendous, awesome, spectacular find that overwhelmingly proves that only idiotic, anti-scientific dolts would dare disbelieve in evolutionism, and the public needs to spend lots more tax dollars supporting them and their Very Important Work. [Never mind the complete lack of patents or other real technological application for their work and personal agendas.]
Seriously, next time you see an article claiming evidence for evolution, and the next time, and the next time, see how it fits this pattern. In the fine print they are forever admitting their dramatic claims are not really a good stratomorphic intermediate, and assuming common ancestry by evolutionary mechanisms is not the same as demonstrating those mechanisms are viable, or that the critter in question was ancestral to any other particular critter (which they generally admit was not in the fine print, as noted above).
And let’s not even get into the failure of the headline-grabbing evolutionists to present with the same energy the critical articles within the evolutionary literature responding to these claims, or the retractions, contrary discoveries, and admissions of error that crop up in the years following each dramatic claim. It’s easy for me to see why people who read the mainstream science journals superficially believe in evolution. But for those who dig deeper, the failure of evolutionary stories to hold up over time is very consistent. It should be no surprise how many anti-evolutionists explain how they became creationists or ID’ers after trying to corroborate some evolutionary claim. Just keep digging folks, that’s all I ask of you…
NOW READ THE LATEST AND TRY NOT TO LAUGH!!!
A "missing link" between humans and their apelike ancestors has been discovered.
The new species of hominid, the evolutionary branch of primates that includes humans, is to be revealed when the two-million-year-old skeleton of a child is unveiled this week.
Scientists believe the almost-complete fossilised skeleton belonged to a previously-unknown type of early human ancestor that may have been a intermediate stage as ape-men evolved into the first species of advanced humans, Homo habilis.
Experts who have seen the skeleton say it shares characteristics with Homo habilis, whose emergence 2.5 million years ago is seen as a key stage in the evolution of our species.
The new discovery could help to rewrite the history of human evolution by filling in crucial gaps in the scientific knowledge.
Most fossilised hominid remains are little more than scattered fragments of bone, so the discovery of an almost-complete skeleton will allow scientists to answer key questions about what our early ancestors looked like and when they began walking upright on two legs.
Palaeontologists and human evolutionary experts behind the discovery have remained silent about the exact details of what they have uncovered, but the scientific community is already abuzz with anticipation of the announcement of the find when it is made on Thursday.
The skeleton was found by Professor Lee Berger, from the University of the Witwatersrand, while exploring cave systems in the Sterkfontein region of South Africa, near Johannesburg, an area known as "the Cradle of Humanity".
The find is deemed to be so significant that Jacob Zuma, the South African president, has visited the university to view the fossils and a major media campaign with television documentaries is planned.
Professor Phillip Tobias, an eminent human anatomist and anthropologist at the university who was one of three experts to first identify Homo habilis as a new species of human in 1964, described the latest discovery as "wonderful" and "exciting".
Although not directly involved in the excavation and subsequent research on the fossils, he is one of the select few scientists outside the research group who have been able to see the skeletons.
He said: "To find a skeleton as opposed to a couple of teeth or an arm bone is a rarity.
"It is one thing to find a lower jaw with a couple of teeth, but it is another thing to find the jaw joined onto the skull, and those in turn uniting further down with the spinal column, pelvis and the limb bones.
"It is not a single find, but several specimens representing several individuals. The remains now being brought to light by Dr Berger and his team are wonderful."
The new fossil skeleton was found along with a number of other partially-complete fossils, encased within breccia sedimentary rock inside a limestone cave known as Malapa cave.
The protection from the elements provided by the cave is thought to have played a large part in keeping the fossils so well preserved.
The fossil record of early humans is notoriously patchy and scientists now hope that the that the new remains will provide fresh clues about how our species evolved.
Scientists believe that a group of apelike hominids known as Australopithicus, which first emerged in Africa around 3.9 million years ago, gradually evolved into the first Homo species.
Over time the Australopithicus species lost their more apelike features as they started to stand upright and their brain capacity increased.
Around 2.5 million years ago Homo habilis, the first species to be described as distinctly human, began to appear, although only a handful of specimens have ever been found.
It is thought that the new fossil to be unveiled this week will be identified as a new species that fits somewhere between Australopithicus and Homo habilis.
If it is confirmed as a missing link between the two groups, it would be of immense scientific importance, helping to fill in a gap in the evolutionary history of modern man.
Dr Simon Underdown, an expert on human evolution at Oxford Brookes University, said the new find could help scientists gain a better understanding of our evolutionary tree.
He said: "A find like this could really increase our understanding of our early ancestors at a time when they first started to become recognisable as human."
The discovery is the most important find from Sterkfontein since an almost-complete fossil of a 3.3 million year old Australopithecus, nicknamed Little Foot, was found in 1994.
Another major discovery was the well-preserved skull of a 2.15 million year old Australopithecus africanus, nicknamed Mrs Ples, in 1947.
Finding almost complete fossilised skeletons of human ancestors is particularly prized by the scientific community.
The presence of a pelvis and complete limb bones would allow scientists to unravel the posture and method of walking used by the extinct species.
If the specimen also contains hand bones, it could provide clues about the species' dexterity and such evidence will prove crucial in determining when the ability of modern humans to handle stone tools first emerged.
Dr Kevin Kuykendall, a palaeoanthropologist at Sheffield University, said such finds were essential in helping to fill in the gaps in our knowledge about human ancestors.
He said: "The information we have right now is probably only based on a few hundred individuals through out the whole world, but some of these are single isolated teeth.
"If this new specimen is more complete and provides better information, all those models about locomotive behaviour will have a chance to really go under scrutiny and refined."
"Genesis 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Read the post before casting undue dispersions. What I believe as far as creation of man is not an issue. A careful reading of my post is too funny and timely.
BTW, Happy Easter!!! God Bless!!!
I enjoy the creation’s of the archaeologists. Nebraska man was created form a pigs tooth. It was shown to have a long fury coat. Lucy was our ancestor until they repositioned her jaw and she became a monkey. Neanderthal is fun also.
Can we post photos of Thomas Helen of Wausau, Wisconsin?
I’ve always wondered why there is no room for compromise on this issue....
As a Conservative, I’m more than willing to admit that Liberals are descended from monkeys. And, because of their “evolved” monkey brains, I can understand why Liberals are unable to accept the FACT that Conservatives are created in the image of G-D.
Ah well....
I want to wish a happy and meaningful Easter to all my Christian friends.
Clever post. No wonder evolutionists see little gain in snowing and swaying the public with these “now we have it” discoveries.
Yours is the best explanation!
.
I just happened to stumble across this. Guess I’m a prophet - or someone is plagiarizing me. :-)
Plagarism? A more apt term seeing it’s Easter and all might be resurrection. Seeing I held on to your post from a year ago this month because I found it profoundly interesting. A little humility wouldn’t hurt. [Translation: I bookmarked it so I could put it to the test the next time the “Missing Link” is found.]
I sincerely apologize if I didn’t pay homage to you in a more ceremonious way other than reposting verbatim your entry from 04/22/2009. Next time, perhaps, I’ll attach an addendum saying how much Liberty1970 wasn’t just insightful, but was also a prophet. :-)
All kidding aside, your post was great.
“It’s easy for me to see why people who read the mainstream science journals superficially believe in evolution. But for those who dig deeper, the failure of evolutionary stories to hold up over time is very consistent. It should be no surprise how many anti-evolutionists explain how they became creationists or ID’ers after trying to corroborate some evolutionary claim.”
—Yes, that’s why evolution is SO popular among the general populace... and yet is so roundly rejected by biologists, paleontologists, geneticists, etc and by every major science organization and university... oh wait.
But seriously, this is the way the mainstream media (not the mainstream science journals) routinely reports such stories, and this kind of lazy crap reporting by the general media is a major reason for so many misconceptions about evolution and a big reason much of the general public doesn’t take it seriously.
*may represent *
*is believed*
*Scientists hope*
*will help them to work out *
*The caves are the site of one of the world’s longest-running archeological excavations and are regarded as paleontological treasure troves.*
All kinds of great fossil finds just happen to be conveniently found together in this one area.
Imagine that....
Excellent.....
I haven’t posted on these links lately... I had an epiphany: There is now no doubt in my mind that each and every one of the evo-atheists on this site are, in fact trolls with the precise purpose of preaching their contempt for the Bible and for God’s truth. I had always suspected and, in some cases was sure of their purposeful heresies.
If someone doesn’t know God and doesn’t know about the Truth then they have an excuse, but these folks don’t even have that to fall back on. They know the Word and choose not to believe. Nearly all of them claim to be Conservative and many even claim to be Christian but it’s most doubtful, even impossible in all but a few cases.
Upon careful examination and after much scientific inquiry and debate, this is what I’ve concluded:
The Conservative, Christian Evolutionist does not now and never did exist.
Interestingly enough even the scientists in the article (and the rest of the lot) are doing nothing but promoting a specific agenda with little regard for the truth. They spew lies with the frequency and voracity of a DC Liberal. I hold both groups in the same high regard.
They all voted for obama November 4,2008.
Considering that every crevo thread ends up as an attack on Christianity, yeah, that about nails it.
The first sign of it is the inability to reasonably discuss the subject. I think the calling names and the like are just a side note. When someone has no argument, they tend to sound a lot like a Liberal discussing the economy, abortion, the Constitution, etc.
God charged us with telling the truth and defending the truth. It’s a blessing and a weight lifted off the shoulders to realize we’re not responsible for convincing other to believe, only passing along the message.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.