Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jet-fighter for a fiver rort throws spolight on Russia's corruption
The Australian ^ | 4/02/2010 | Tony Halpin

Posted on 04/01/2010 8:43:48 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

THE jet-fighter for a fiver was a scam too far even for Russia. An official has resigned after a state agency sold four MiG 31 warplanes to a fictitious company for $US5 each, then bought them back for $US100,000. Corruption is so casual and endemic in Russia that the tricksters clearly felt little need to hide their actions behind an elaborate front. But the exposure of the case also illustrates a renewed drive by President Dmitry Medvedev to change a culture of graft that is threatening Russia's future.

Motorists run a daily gauntlet of traffic police extorting bribes, parents and patients grease the palms of teachers and doctors for favourable treatment and entrepreneurs try to establish new businesses in the face of bureaucrats demanding kickbacks.

Police threaten to raid businesses unless their owners pay them off, while unscrupulous firms hire officers to storm competitors' premises to put them out of business.

Transparency International rated Russia 146th out of 180 countries on its latest corruption index, estimating that bribery costs $US300 billion ($332bn) a year.

Corruption costs lives too; the fire that killed 155 people at a nightclub in Perm in December was blamed on lax safety inspections. Public outrage at that incident and a series of police scandals galvanised Mr Medvedev to intensify his war on corruption.

With modernisation of Russia's economy the central theme of his presidency, Mr Medvedev demanded an "immediate and crushing response" against greedy officials.

The Duma, Russia's parliament, has passed a law to ban pretrial detention of people accused of economic crimes, a favourite tactic of corrupt police and officials to extort bribes.

(Excerpt) Read more at theaustralian.com.au ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: corruption; graft; medvedev; mig; mig31; russia

1 posted on 04/01/2010 8:43:49 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Under commie-lite, bribery has really come into its own. You thought it was bad under communism itself, it’s way more lucrative now.

We’re heading there in the other direction.


2 posted on 04/01/2010 8:46:21 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

What, praytell, is a “rort?”


3 posted on 04/01/2010 8:49:48 PM PDT by Candor7 (Now's the time to ante up against the Obama Fascist Junta ( member NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

noun Australia, informal: a fraudulent or dishonest act or practice


4 posted on 04/01/2010 8:54:16 PM PDT by deks (So will Obama sign a bill that requires native Hawaiians to show a birth certificate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: deks

Thanks!


5 posted on 04/01/2010 9:02:06 PM PDT by Candor7 (Now's the time to ante up against the Obama Fascist Junta ( member NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
estimating that bribery costs [Russians] $US300 billion ($332bn) a year.

Pikers. Bribery of the Rats has cost us about $5 TRILLION in the past 14 months alone.

6 posted on 04/01/2010 9:17:30 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The US will not die with a whimper. It will die with thundering applause from the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Russia, land of opportunity. Sure glad my grandparents walked from the Volga to Hamburg and took a ship to Ellis Island.


7 posted on 04/01/2010 9:53:42 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

Too bad to read this - under Communism, corruption was bad, but “ethical”. We used to send items to relatives living in a SSR. We quickly learned that if you sent something, it would get “lost”. However, if you sent TWO identical items, one of them would always get delivered! It would have been just as easy for the customs inspectors to steal both...


8 posted on 04/01/2010 10:23:04 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

They were probably too lazy to steal two things in one day. My dad was a mail carrier, so I won’t make any comparisons to the US Postal service.


9 posted on 04/01/2010 10:30:50 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson