Skip to comments.
Religious group calls Obama 'first gay president'
The Hill ^
Posted on 03/31/2010 11:46:53 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Oh brother.......
To: Sub-Driver
Why not, if WJC was the first black president?
2
posted on
03/31/2010 11:48:14 AM PDT
by
Spok
(Free Range Republican)
To: Sub-Driver
Well just ask Larry Sinclair.
3
posted on
03/31/2010 11:49:11 AM PDT
by
GraceG
To: Sub-Driver
Larry Sinclair: “Told ya!”
To: Spok
That was my first thought too!
Great minds think alike.
5
posted on
03/31/2010 11:51:54 AM PDT
by
K-oneTexas
(I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
To: Sub-Driver
To: pissant
7
posted on
03/31/2010 11:54:36 AM PDT
by
BossLady
(OBAMA - The Father of Velvet Marxism)
To: Sub-Driver
Just because the gay agenda and the father of lies’ agenda happen to coincide...
Of course, that might be redundant, as the father of lies is using the homos to advance his will here in this world.
8
posted on
03/31/2010 11:56:03 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: Sub-Driver
He is certainly the gayest ACTING president we have ever had.
BTW: Our first gay President was James Buchanan.
10
posted on
03/31/2010 11:57:11 AM PDT
by
Clemenza
(Remember our Korean War Veterans)
To: Sub-Driver
11
posted on
03/31/2010 11:57:18 AM PDT
by
TSgt
(When the government fears the people, there is liberty. - Thomas Jefferson)
To: Sub-Driver
He's more like our first Gay Satanic POTUS.
12
posted on
03/31/2010 11:58:12 AM PDT
by
TSgt
(When the government fears the people, there is liberty. - Thomas Jefferson)
To: Sub-Driver
No. He is the first RED president.
13
posted on
03/31/2010 11:59:43 AM PDT
by
central_va
( http://www.15thvirginia.org)
To: central_va
He is our first 3rd world president.
14
posted on
03/31/2010 12:02:38 PM PDT
by
DonaldC
(A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
To: MrB
Homosexual “rights” are now indistinguishable from a protection racket.
The court(s) didn’t legalize same-sex “marriage” to advance freedom, but to use it as a battering ram against freedom.
15
posted on
03/31/2010 12:03:59 PM PDT
by
Ouderkirk
(Democrats...the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy, and Sedition)
To: Ouderkirk
The homos are just one of the spearpoints in the arsenal of weapons arrayed against the traditional family.
16
posted on
03/31/2010 12:06:22 PM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: Sub-Driver
17
posted on
03/31/2010 12:06:42 PM PDT
by
pallis
To: Sub-Driver
18
posted on
03/31/2010 12:06:47 PM PDT
by
MtnMan101
(THE PROBLEM WITH SOCIALISUM IS THAT YOU EVENTUALLY RUN OUT OF OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY)
To: Sub-Driver
Well, I always did think Michelle looked more like a man than a woman, so maybe. . .
19
posted on
03/31/2010 12:08:09 PM PDT
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: Sub-Driver
You decide!
(Mom's jeans and all!!)
20
posted on
03/31/2010 12:09:53 PM PDT
by
MtnMan101
(THE PROBLEM WITH SOCIALISUM IS THAT YOU EVENTUALLY RUN OUT OF OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
