Posted on 03/31/2010 5:02:18 AM PDT by Kaslin
Will it be easier to persuade people that Barack Obama is wrong on the issues or to try to convince them that he is outright evil?
Thats a crucial question facing conservatives as we gear up for fateful election battles in 2010 and 2012.
Based on human nature and political history, the answer to that question ought to be obvious: Americans have often felt that our leaders make mistakes or pursue destructive policies but we have rarely (if ever) believed that they did it deliberately to damage the country. In the last 80 years, Herbert Hoover, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter and George H. W. Bush all got voted out of office by an angry electorate but a majority of the public never embraced the idea that these floundering presidents were actually bad guys. Only during President Nixons Watergate scandal did a substantial segment of the population come to believe that their president might well be evil or insane, and that belief led directly to the presidents resignation. The next impeachment crisis turned out very differently, of course: with GOP efforts to portray Bill Clinton as a dangerous ethical monster bringing the president the highest approval ratings of his career from a public that preferred to view him as a lovable (or at least forgivable) rogue.
Despite this history, many conservatives insist on outspokenly demonizing Barack Obama and express self-righteous certainty that these paranoid characterizations represent an effective political strategy. Leading talk show hosts repeatedly declare that the president is pursuing a diabolical, deliberate scheme to wreck the U.S. economy so that a desperate, impoverished populace will welcome the imposition of socialism. A prominent new group called the Impeach Obama Campaign asks: Are you willing to let him construct a totalitarian regime: fascism, socialism, Obamaism take your pick? The leaders of this new movement (including former GOP office-holders and prominent political professionals) go on to declare: Make no mistake. Were now in the middle of a bloodless coup the takeover of an entire nation by the hate-America crowd a cold-blooded gang that despises Americas prosperity, our standing in the world, our trust in God and our generosity and goodness .What can we do to stop this monomaniac, this American dictator?
This sort of rhetoric has encouraged a climate of opinion among conservatives that resulted in an alarming Harris Poll in the midst of the recent health care debate. According to a survey of 2,230 individuals, 57% of Republicans believe that Obama is a Muslim, 45% agree that he was not born in the United States and so is not eligible to be president, and 38% back the statement that Obama is doing many of the things that Hitler did.
If sane conservatives refuse to confront and discredit such attitudes and arguments, we will help to ensure the presidents re-election and the bitter collapse of the conservative movement. For several reasons, the instinct to portray the president as a traitor, an alien, a would-be dictator or a deliberate nation-wrecker represents a suicidally stupid strategy for blocking his power.
1. Obama remains far more popular than his policies. The ten most recent major polls on the presidents job approval (taken between March 10 and 26th) all showed an almost even division among the public, with no more than 50% and no less than 45% supporting the presidents performance in office (he averaged 47.1%). On health care, however, eleven polls (between March 3 and 21st) showed average support for Obamas approach of only 39.4%, with every one of them showing more people opposed to the proposed reform than backing it. Why should Republicans concentrate their fire on the presidents personality and motivations, where at least half the country is still inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt, rather than focusing on his ruinous policies, where most people already agree with us? In fact, debating the presidents character, or arguing about whether he truly intends to harm the nation, only takes attention away from his specific mistakes and wastes energy on an irrelevant argument we ultimately cant win. No matter how fervently some movement conservatives may believe that the President of the United States intends to pursue some mad kamikaze mission of wrecking the country he leads, each time the TV screen fills with gauzy images of a smiling Obama interacting with his beautiful family, or the elegant commander in chief saluting the troops or performing some traditional ceremonial function, most viewers will come away convinced that hes a hardworking guy whos trying his best.
2. Hysterical rhetoric about socialist takeover and looming dictatorship will lead the public to fear conservatives more than they fear the president. The same Harris Poll that showed a majority of GOPers think Obama is a Muslim also suggested that a full 24% of Republicans believe he may be the Antichrist. Why would independent, moderate or undecided voters ever want to associate themselves with such people? When Tea Party supporters eagerly tell the smirking New York Times about their preparations for armed resistance and potential civil war, most politically disengaged Americans (precisely the segment of the population we need to reach) will run in horror in the other direction. If we talk about out-of-control spending, rising deficits and the potential of economic disaster, we make the situation and Obamas policies sound scary. If instead we talk about some invisible cabal to inflict totalitarian takeover, while we promise to play the role of musket-toting Colonial Minutemen, we make ourselves sound scary. Describing Obama as a Marxist or a Muslim or a scheming nation-wrecker doesnt isolate him; it isolates us.
3. Pronouncements about the end of freedom or the destruction of capitalism will sound like crying wolf to the great majority of Americans. Within the next few months and years, as Democrats seek to defend their Congressional majorities and then the White House, there is little chance that the every-day lives of ordinary Americans will change dramatically. On the health care bill, for instance, Obama cunningly delayed the implementation of its most substantial provisions until 2014long after he hopes he is safely re-elected. Even at times of economic suffering (like the current moment), all surveys show that Americans remain overwhelmingly optimistic about their personal situations and prospects; by huge margins, we like our jobs, our families and our neighborhoods. The chances that a majority of Americans will, within the next few years, actually experience the loss of freedom or the national destruction right-wingers warn them about are, fortunately, almost nil. After years of dire alarms from conservatives about imminent catastrophe, what are we supposed to do if that catastrophe doesnt arrive? Assuming that the nation will somehow muddle through the next few years without a complete financial collapse or some devastating terrorist attack, we will look like demagogic alarmists who tried to frighten the public for political gain. Instead of concentrating on our own predictions of total disaster, we should focus on Obamas predictions of robust recovery and falling unemployment. Hes profoundly unlikely to see his rosy scenarios unfold, just as GOP gloom-and-doomers are unlikely to see our worst-case scenarios come true. Why not highlight Obama as a failed and false prophet rather than embarrassing ourselves with our own far-fetched prophecies of destruction?
The practical arguments outlined above seem so obvious that its difficult to understand or explain the apparently powerful instinct to portray Obama as some sort of fanatical true-believer who craves Americas destruction more than he values his own popularity or place in history. Every week during the Open Mind Friday and Disagreement Day features of my radio show, the phone lines swarm with impassioned callers who are determined to persuade me (and the world) that Obama knows precisely what hes doing and that he purposefully wants to wreck the nation in order to impose some alien system. These calls, often from highly intelligent and sophisticated individuals, test my commitment to on-air openness because they make conservatives look bad (and needlessly divided) while taking time from more fruitful lines of attack in discrediting the administration.
A recent caller, exasperated by my refusal to concede Obamas malevolence, asked an important question: If youre so sure youre right about this, why is it that everybody else on the radio says hes a socialist who wants to destroy the economy? Why should we believe that youre the only one whos right, and everybody else is wrong?
The answer to that question raises an uncomfortable fact about talk radio and highlights the dangers of allowing media figures to set the anti-Obama agenda. The great majority of Americans remain politically disengaged they wont ever listen to partisan talk on the radio or tune in to news programming on cable TV, shunning Fox and MSNBC with similar consistency. The leading political cable shows in the country draw viewership that amounts to barely 1% of the national population; the top radio program in the United States (hosted, of course, by Rush Limbaugh) will draw only 5 or 6% of the available listeners and much less than 1% of the overall population even in major markets where it crushes the competition.
This salient but seldom-acknowledged fact highlights the difference between the successful pursuit of media ratings and the successful pursuit of electoral majorities. Heavy-breathing warnings about impending doom can make for riveting radio, as can melodramatic descriptions of the president as the ultimate incarnation of pure evil. Such conversation can help deliver 6%, or even 9%, of all those tuned into the radio at a given time of day or night. But theres a world of difference between a few percent of available radio listeners, and the more than 50% of available voters you need to persuade to win meaningful political power.
If conservatives persist in characterizing the President of the United States as vicious and radical, insanely bent on the destruction of the Republic, we may find reassurance from the already like-minded but well lose nearly everyone in the persuadable middle. As a result, we could spend the next decade or more as an increasingly impotent, irrelevant and angry opposition, howling in the political wilderness.
Marxist garbage in; Marxist garbage out...
(Freedom was too hard anyway.)
He very clearly is a Marxist, and those in denial are ignorant of what The Communist Manifesto states and presupposes.
This article cautions against using certain Alinsky tactics to isolate and demonize him, but that is precisely what needs to be done. He is the worst POTUS in the history of this nation, and people need to know that.
Keep the pressure on and give him no quarter.
I don’t throw the word “evil” around lightly, so it’ll take some to convince me that he’s evil and playing stupid rather than just plain stupid and taking us all down with him.
Look into the face of Democrat member of congress and you’ll see the reflection of a member of the electorate who loves to wear a worker’s cap with a cute litle red star on it. (disgusting)
IMHO
How about sticking to the truth?
Love it. Take credit if it’s yours.
The answer is not to refrain from calling out the Marxist for being a Marxist, but to educate those squishy non politically engaged and help them get their head out of their a$$.
See my tagline for an explanation.
He’s doing evil, like most leftists do the bidding of the evil one,
but he’s been convinced that he’s either working for his own glory, or that he’s working for “the greater good”, and no one but God Almighty knows what the “greater good” is.
One need only read the definition of Fascism and compare it to what is going on to realize that we are heading straight into a Fascist system, yet the mere mention of the word brings screams from the same people who happily referred to George W. Bush as a fascist.
BTW- I usually end up listening to Medved an hour or so on delay in the afternoon when there isn’t something else to listen to. This article is an example of the type of stuff that ends up causing me to scream at my radio. Medved seems either incapaple or unwilling to connect the dots when it comes to Obama. Obama may be crazy, but he has been crammed through and through with a Marxist view of the world, and that view is what drives him. Obama doesn’t understand capitalism; he understands the Marxist view of capitalism, something Medved needs to come to grip with...
“Will it be easier to persuade people that Barack Obama is wrong on the issues or to try to convince them that he is outright evil?”
You will never be able to accomplish the former BECAUSE he is the latter.
Both.
Independents have swung wildly away from the big O. Not the same as the squishy middle I guess.
What we need to circumvent is the youth voting for more government goodies by laying out in clear terms what all of this is going to cost them.
He’s either saying “ignore the truth, the people won’t believe it” . . . or “you are a pack of idiots conservatives.” I don’t like either message.
He has the combo. A couple members of my family do, too.
STUPID & STUBBORN
dangerous mix, if you ask me.
“The next impeachment crisis turned out very differently, of course: with GOP efforts to portray Bill Clinton as a dangerous ethical monster bringing the president the highest approval ratings of his career from a public that preferred to view him as a lovable (or at least forgivable) rogue.”
The result was different because instead of principled leadership within the GOP, we had a gutless pansy like Trent Lott and others who refused to act.
Regarding Zero... it is clear to anyone with a brain, that everything he is doing is intended to destroy our economy and way of life. His supporters can not point to one thing he has done that has benefitted the country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.