To: BP2
According to one plan released by the FBI, the group was to kill a law enforcement officer, then during the funeral precession, hit again with IEDs to kill more LEOs.
Something doesn't smell right. If they were planning on doing this then fine, arrest them all. Their "doctrine" however doesn't support this behavior...
Why weren't these places raided?
68 posted on
03/29/2010 8:10:19 AM PDT by
TSgt
(When the government fears the people, there is liberty. - Thomas Jefferson)
To: MikeWUSAF
I see that that NJ (or PA?) isn't on the that map.
I feel relieved that there aren't any muslim terrorists in NJ that need to be rounded up.
NJ probably has tons of militant Christians though.../s
To: MikeWUSAF
Why weren't these places raided?They're the only ones left with Constitutional rights.
To: MikeWUSAF
and that map doesnt begin to represent the Mexican gang and political groups
138 posted on
03/29/2010 8:23:09 AM PDT by
Chickensoup
(We have the government we deserve. Is our government our traitor?)
To: MikeWUSAF
To: MikeWUSAF
OFF-TOPIC from the thread, but...
I will never understand why the known terrorist “hot-spots” have not produced more arrests since Clinton’s time till now, frankly — especially in the case of Norman, Oklahoma... Three MAJOR terrorist incidents with way too many “coincidences” and not at least one arrest? I don’t understand it, really — the ONLY thing that saves me from a bad opinion of the FBI in those cases is the slim hope that they have infiltrated and it’s a wealthy asset for intelligence — still can’t understand how it’ worth the lives of over 3,000 citizens, but maybe the big picture justifies it... They have been successful in preventing attacks and making arrests in other places — who knows what they’ve really been doing behind the scenes...
437 posted on
03/29/2010 3:09:56 PM PDT by
LibertyRocks
(http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson