Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt; Travis McGee; P-Marlowe

good find, thanks. See cboldt’s link to indictment


158 posted on 03/29/2010 8:30:53 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

According to the indictment, on 2-6-10 the defendants attempted to go to Kentucky in furtherance of their conspiracy, but “weather conditions prevented them” from going.

Real cracker-jack prosecution there.


229 posted on 03/29/2010 9:08:05 AM PDT by reagandemocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

To: xzins; Cboldt; Travis McGee; blue-duncan
See cboldt’s link to indictment

It seems to me that the way "weapons of mass destruction" is being defined here, any weapon capable of killing more than one person at a time would be considered a "weapon of mass destruction" by this Justice Department. I'm pretty darn sure that when Bush went into Iraq, that Iraq had literally millions of "weapons of mass destruction" that we not only found, but confiscated and destroyed.

The indictment does not indicate how they came to the conclusion that this group was engaged in actual seditious activity and the allegations are vague to say the least. There is no actual description of the weapons that were supposedly in their possession that were illegal, nor is there any specific indication that they had actually done any specific act in furtherance of any specific intent conspiracy.

This is going to be interesting.

233 posted on 03/29/2010 9:09:37 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson