Posted on 03/28/2010 3:00:13 PM PDT by RED SOUTH
Palin is helping McCain. Doesn't make her a rino anymore than Reagan was a rino when he helped rino's in 78. Yes , he did.
Anyway , would you rather have Mitt , Huck or Pawlenty? Your choices are probally down to the four or you can sit out again and help that pig Obama get another term.
Forget about crossing your fingers for some fantasy of another canidate emerging from somewhere else to save the day. If you do not have a pac raising money now and are active by campaigning and collecting you I.O.U's , then you will be too far behind to mount a serious run later. Only four republicans are this far in the process.
Another point to think about , Palin probally did this as part of a larger strategy. To middle America , people who don't identify strictly to party or ideology but usually decide the election , seeing Palin and McCain together was a nice contrast to Obama and Pelosi and a lot of them voted for Obama have huge regrets and after seeing Palin and Mccain together , wished they had voted the other way. I am talking about Reagan democrats who voted for Perot and have been the swing vote that decides elections.
And don't forget that strong national defense and reasoned foreign policy!
That's nice, Sylvia.
Truth101A
Since Jan 23, 2010
I was about to make the typical parody post of what the typical response should be... and lo and behold, they beat me to it.
Now go away you Constitution hating war profiteer. :->
..and you are who that I should care?
I don't usually do that either, but you're so easy, Wanda. LOL
That book tour shocked them all. “THE PEOPLE” spoke big time for Sarah. They know their own. Just like we know are own here in spite of their conservative mask.
LOL!
So, your point?
We luv her.
Same back to you
Feeling left out are you? This 'So What' thread sure is a magnet for loons, you are right about that.
You sure have gotten comfortable calling FReepers "trolls" in your short life here. What gives?
“So, your point?
We luv her.”
Case in point.
Emotion, not ideology. If she believes in McCain’s “vision for America”, she isn’t a conservative.
Hey, maroon...you were so anxious to dig up some innocuous post I made in 2009. How about digging up all of the ones I have made recently, advocating smaller government? How about finding the multiple posts I have made listing current potential candidates that I favor - not a RINO among them?
What? Doesn't support your agenda, you say? You'd rather do the selective post-digging?
Perhaps you'd better learn a little more about the people who post here before you sling disgusting accusations as you have been doing.
And you only do it because you know I don't like the politician that you worship.
Shame on you.
“How about digging up all of the ones I have made recently, advocating smaller government? “
You mean all those “PaulTARD” posts?
“And you only do it because you know I don’t like the politician that you worship.”
I don’t worship or follow any politician. They’re all crooks until proven otherwise.
LOL! Go for it - no one is paying attention. They’re caught up in spelling and all the other unimportant cares of the world.
Oh, yeah and I’ll keep on going after the divisive Paultards. I support conservatives, not Code-Pink-aligned, self-serving moonbats like Ron Paul.
Now that I got you to expose your agenda, you have become dull and tiresome.
I’ll try to attend your eventual, inevitable ZOT party, though. :-)
Libertarians support less government.
Republicans support big government.
Now tell me who is conservative.
“Libertarians support less government.
Republicans support big government.
Now tell me who is conservative.”
It’s all just a game to them.
Don’t forget the FREE PIZZA and five show up. What was it oh ya a listen tour of one stop.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.