Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Chooses Health Policy Scholar as the Director for Medicare and Medicaid
NYT ^ | 3/28/10 | Robert Pear

Posted on 03/28/2010 11:34:00 AM PDT by Nachum

WASHINGTON — President Obama will soon name Dr. Donald M. Berwick, an iconoclastic scholar of health policy, to run Medicare and Medicaid, the programs that serve nearly one-third of all Americans, administration officials said Saturday.

Dr. Berwick, a pediatrician, is president of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement in Cambridge, Mass. He has repeatedly challenged doctors and hospitals to provide better care at a lower cost. He says the government and insurers can increase the quality and efficiency of care by basing payments on the value of services, not the volume.

Mr. Obama plans to nominate Dr. Berwick to be administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, a unit of the Department of Health and Human Services that has been without a permanent chief since October 2006, when Dr. Mark B. McClellan stepped down.

If confirmed by the Senate, Dr. Berwick would have a huge plate of responsibilities under the new health care law.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chooses; health; obama; policy
Uh oh.
1 posted on 03/28/2010 11:34:00 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

2 posted on 03/28/2010 11:34:37 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
From the American Thinker:

"I confess that I have read nothing of Dr. Fisher's opus, but:

Don has been an intellectual force in health care for decades. He helped forge many ideas incorporated in the new health care law."

As examples, Mr. Findlay cited provisions of the law intended to reduce readmissions to hospitals, prevent hospital-acquired infections and hold doctors and hospitals more accountable.

This sounds a lot like deciding which treatments are allowed and which are not. It is always done in the name of efficiency, but it comes down to categorically denying certain treatments in certain kinds of cases, taking the power away from the physician.

At his institute's annual conference in December, Dr. Berwick issued this challenge to health care providers: "Over the next three years, reduce the total resource consumption of your health care system, no matter where you start, by 10 percent. Do that without a single instance of harm, without rationing effective care, without excluding needed services for any population you serve."

He said he had learned from his own medical problems, which include osteoarthritis in his right knee. "It comes from medical error, botched surgery when I was a medical student, aggravated by years of jogging," he said.

Doctors urged him to have a knee replacement operation several years ago, but he decided instead to have just a "steroid injection," and the outcome has been fine, he said.

Lucky for him. May we all be so lucky when the government decides which treatments we can't get. Maybe I am wrong and he is a brilliant man who can squeeze half a trillion our of Medicare and give everyone good treatment, and deny nobody the care they need. Without ever having run anything."
3 posted on 03/28/2010 11:38:53 AM PDT by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

More morons from the Harvard system. How so many idiots can be shoehorned into one university system is difficult to fathom.


4 posted on 03/28/2010 11:41:04 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
He has repeatedly challenged doctors and hospitals to provide better care at a lower cost.

What an ingenious idea to achieve better quality at lower prices...a simple challenge!

Efficiency experts around the world will be astounded to learn of this inexpensive but powerful new tool.

Heheh! What a bunch of dolts in this administration!

5 posted on 03/28/2010 11:54:56 AM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies (I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself... - D.H. Lawrence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Have no fear...this will work out as well as Obama's "cash for weatherization" plan!

DOA!

6 posted on 03/28/2010 11:57:26 AM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies (I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself... - D.H. Lawrence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

nah his whole gig is about cutting “unncessary” service...which will mean just about anything you may actually need..


7 posted on 03/28/2010 11:57:44 AM PDT by Crim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies

Well, if they want
“Over the next three years, reduce the total resource consumption of your health care system, no matter where you start, by 10 percent. Do that without a single instance of harm, without rationing effective care, without excluding needed services for any population you serve”

the FedGov will have to drop EMTALA - tlak about the ultimate cost driver! (42 USC §1395dd)


8 posted on 03/28/2010 12:01:31 PM PDT by ASOC (In case of attack, tune to 640 kilocycles or 1240 kilocycles on your AM dial.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
He says the government and insurers can increase the quality and efficiency of care by basing payments on the value of services, not the volume.

So this guy thinks that you should pay more for routine physicals (high volume but low "value") than you do for, say, chemo therapy (lower volume but higher "value")?

If that's so, basic economics says that people will end up having fewer physicals and consequently, cancer treatments and other high end therapies will increase down the road.

9 posted on 03/28/2010 12:20:59 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The value of service, huh? And who decides what a given service is worth? Bet you it’s not the patient.


10 posted on 03/28/2010 12:27:12 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies
Have no fear...this will work out as well as Obama's "cash for weatherization" plan! DOA!

...Except WE'LL be the DOA.

11 posted on 03/28/2010 12:29:54 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Socialism works everywhere it has been tried, right?

I’m hopping a boat to Cuba tomorrow myself. I’m sure a tropic utopia awaits me.


12 posted on 03/28/2010 1:05:16 PM PDT by mike-zed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

More genius level thinking from Obama: Putting a PEDIATRICIAN in charge of health care for the ELDERLY.

I’m sure his ivory tower experience will be of immense benefit to our nation’s seniors.


13 posted on 03/28/2010 2:03:30 PM PDT by Oscar the Grouch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson