Skip to comments.
The left's next move: Salary caps
Washington Times ^
| March 27, 2010
| Editorial
Posted on 03/27/2010 9:22:41 PM PDT by JohnRLott
Emboldened by the passage of health care legislation, the Obama administration will set its sights on a new target - regulating how much money you can make.
Recipients of federal bailout money already face regulations designed to rein in "excessive" corporate salaries. Since the administration has proclaimed this first step a success, it is only a matter of time before it seeks broader control over private-sector compensation.
The administration gave itself a pat on the back for a job well done after "only" 16 of 104 senior corporate executives quit when their salaries fell under the pay czar's knife. The administration takes this as indisputable proof that high salaries are not needed to keep executives in their jobs.
The evidence, however, is far from compelling. . . .
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: agenda; bho44; obama; payczar; regulation; salarycaps; socialists; washingtontimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
03/27/2010 9:22:41 PM PDT
by
JohnRLott
To: JohnRLott
And if politically Obama cannot get salary caps directly, he will get them indirectly by continuing to screw up the economy.
2
posted on
03/27/2010 9:28:04 PM PDT
by
mlocher
(USA is a sovereign nation)
To: JohnRLott
it makes sense. free markets create winners and losers. this administration seems hell bent on making the central government an agent to level all of us.
the CEO of AT&T should have the same life as the homeless guy that lives under a bridge.
3
posted on
03/27/2010 9:29:40 PM PDT
by
JohnBrowdie
(http://forum.stink-eye.net)
To: JohnRLott
I wonder how many of those CEOs voted for Obama?
4
posted on
03/27/2010 9:32:42 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(:: Happy Dependence Day!. ::)
To: JohnRLott
Get these communists out of our government - by any means.
5
posted on
03/27/2010 9:32:50 PM PDT
by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: JohnRLott
This idea comes from the people who think high school teachers should make as much as famous athletes. We’ll see if the Hollyweird set agrees to crop the ill-gotten gains from their movies.
6
posted on
03/27/2010 9:33:02 PM PDT
by
driftless2
(for long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion)
To: JohnRLott
Individual slaves had and have in todays’ black-market slave markets an assigned market value. Why not assign work values salary caps based on job descriptions to all employees also? Self-employment should be destroyed...as it is being for solo MDs now. All of the rest of us will follow that model. Salary caps are the same thing as slave commodity market valuations, and, in our society will be a way of commoditizing human labor value. Such labor can be securitized too, just like prime and subprime mortgages. Will Gore and allies form a Chicago Labor Securitization Exchange also? It is possible that a national labor market using securitizations for trading purposes can be established following the model of the Obama, et al, founded, Chicago Carbon Futures Exchange. Imagine, your labor value assumed and regulated and traded on a world-wide basis, just as mortgages!!! You will not know who owns your contract!! Healthcare will be accorded to your worth and longevity in the workFARCE. Expect nothing on your discharge from the workFARCE. Just thinking.
7
posted on
03/27/2010 9:35:47 PM PDT
by
givemELL
(Does Taiwan Meet the Criteria to Qualify as an "Overseas Territory of the United States"? by Richar)
To: JohnRLott
I'm all for salary and compensation caps!
(On trial attorneys and show people and union bosses and plaintiffs and network executives.)
.
8
posted on
03/27/2010 9:36:39 PM PDT
by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: JohnRLott
I’m retired from a Fortune top 20 company; it escapes me why they have not re-located their HQ from the U.S. to an overseas location to get out from under the lunacy that now exists in D.C. I predict that many companies will do just that to retain some measure of freedom over their structure and practices and for the tax benefits that will accrue.
9
posted on
03/27/2010 9:43:06 PM PDT
by
Rembrandt
(.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
To: JohnRLott
after "only" 16 of 104 senior corporate executives quit when their salaries fell under the pay czar's knife. The administration takes this as indisputable proof that high salaries are not needed to keep executives in their jobs.
That passes as 'proof'? I'm surprised we haven't heard more on Elvis & UFO sightings coming from DC.
My guess is those who left found better salaries elsewhere.
10
posted on
03/27/2010 9:55:54 PM PDT
by
proud_yank
(Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
To: JohnRLott
Will this also apply to Tiger Woods and A-Rod?
11
posted on
03/27/2010 10:02:30 PM PDT
by
SHOOT THE MOON bat
(Somewhere in Kenya a village is missing it's idiot.)
To: JohnRLott
This is coming from the people who raise their own debt ceiling every month.
12
posted on
03/27/2010 10:03:08 PM PDT
by
denydenydeny
("I'm sure this goes against everything you've been taught, but right and wrong do exist"-Dr House)
To: JohnRLott
As a child, I was taught to use envy as an inspiration to become a better person, and become educated enough to acquire the material things I wanted.
I think that hating people because they have something you don't, is childish and makes no one miserable except yourself.
If anyone has managed to work themselves into a position to make tons of money, the more power to them...the more rich people we have, the more jobs and opportunities for us all.
But any government deciding that someone is making too much money, or getting to large a bonus, is pure, unadultrated COMMUNISM.
As long as I pay my taxes, whatever I make is no of the government's business. In fact, the first thing I think of when I hear they want to "cap" my salary, is to quit work and earn it "under the table".
That is the kind of reverse effects this obamaland fantasy is going to net him in the end...Atlas will shrug and he will be left holding all of the promises he made to the "moocher" class, and no money to pay them with...that is when THEY will break out the tar and feathers.
So here's the obama agenda:
They want to tell you IF you can be born - abortion.
They want to tell you HOW you will live - healthcare
They want to tell you how WELL you can live - Salary Caps
They want to tell you who you will SUPPORT - Amnesty
and...
They want to tell you when it's time to die - obamacare death panels.
Now, is this really the "change" America wanted?
13
posted on
03/27/2010 10:10:12 PM PDT
by
FrankR
(Those of us who love AMERICA far outnumber those who love obama - your choice.)
To: All
Ladies and Gentlemen: We have a dictator in the White House.
14
posted on
03/27/2010 10:16:34 PM PDT
by
Sun
(Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
To: JohnRLott
If he really wants to ruin the economy he should go after salespeople and related occupations by limiting their commissions. That’ll make us a turd world nation in no time flat!!
15
posted on
03/27/2010 10:17:02 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(If we're an Empire, why are Cuba, Iraq, the Philippines, Japan & Germany independent?)
To: JohnRLott
16
posted on
03/27/2010 10:23:58 PM PDT
by
dalebert
To: JohnRLott
>"the Obama administration will set its sights on a new target - regulating how much money you can make. Recipients of federal bailout money already face regulations designed to rein in "excessive" corporate salaries."I absolutely agree!
Let's start with our Govt workers... Congress comes to mind! What a HUGE drain they are!!!
Hey Congresscritters listen up......
You're next.
17
posted on
03/27/2010 10:33:07 PM PDT
by
rawcatslyentist
(Jeremiah 50:31 Behold, I am against you," O " you most proud, said the said the Lord GOD of hosts)
To: JohnRLott
What a bunch of maroons in the Administration - OF COURSE you’re gonna stay in your job and take the salary cap - IF there ain’t no comparable NEW job out there to get cuz the economy is in the toilet ...
18
posted on
03/27/2010 10:43:25 PM PDT
by
Lmo56
To: JohnRLott
People in the Obama Administration may try to have salary caps for private sector workers legislated, but they obviously don’t think about where their revenues come from. With their idiocy, we’ll eventually see small government by way of default.
19
posted on
03/27/2010 10:48:55 PM PDT
by
familyop
(cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote.)
To: rawcatslyentist
They are capped. They make 147,000 a year. They can’t get bonus’. They can vote in a three percent raise every now and then but will never get what CEO’s are paid.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson