Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Response to the New York Times [Pope falsely accused]
National Review ^ | March 27, 2010 | Father Raymond J. de Souza

Posted on 03/27/2010 3:35:37 PM PDT by Mount Athos

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: count-your-change
You can't compare Weakland and Law.

Law made bad administrative decisions based on trusting psychologists who told him that they'd cured molesters.

Weakland was a unchaste homosexual who paid off his lover with diocesan money, in addition to various other faults, like sitting on this report for 19 years.

Law is a glorified parish priest in Rome. (He was not put there by BXVI, but by JPII.)

Weakland is the retired bishop emeritus of Milwaukee, where he gives interviews to NY Times reporters complaining about how the Vatican moved too slowly on cases he hadn't bothered to tell them about.

You'll note also that Law was hated by the left, and Weakland was loved by them.

21 posted on 03/27/2010 7:29:59 PM PDT by Campion ("President Barack Obama" is an anagram for "An Arab-backed imposter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Campion

“Law made bad administrative decisions based on trusting psychologists who told him that they’d cured molesters.”

I cannot agree with that assessment of Law.

While this is true of some of the other bishops, Law knowingly reassigned molesting monsters over and over again.


22 posted on 03/27/2010 7:43:21 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Campion

So ....Weakland is retired?

Does he still say mass?

Has he suffered any consequences?


23 posted on 03/27/2010 7:44:31 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Campion

I wasn’t comparing them but rather how they were or were not dealt with by the current Pope.

The Bible is pretty clear on what should be done.


24 posted on 03/27/2010 8:00:02 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife
Weakland reached the mandatory retirement age and is now writing his memoirs. I don't know what his retirement pay is but maybe his book will bring in some cash.

Oh, And now his title is “Emeritus Archbishop”.
Consequences? Yes, but suffering? Not so much.

25 posted on 03/27/2010 11:28:54 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

The ANTI-CATHOLICS are out in FULL FORCE!!


26 posted on 03/28/2010 3:05:45 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion,,,,,,the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stop_fascism
A 40 year old case against a man who died 12 years ago becomes front page news at the beginning of holy week. How interesting. This couldn’t have anything to do with payback for the Bishop’s stand against Obamacare, could it?

The liberal fascists at the NYT are like clockwork every year at the beginning of Holy Week.

27 posted on 03/28/2010 5:19:32 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

28 posted on 03/28/2010 5:22:12 AM PDT by narses ("lex orandi, lex credendi, lex vivendi")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

They are both out of circulation now. Remember, no charges were ever brought against them and there’s really not much else, other than what it has already done, that the Vatican can do. They should have removed Weakland long ago, but JPII was pretty lax and, furthermore, there probably hadn’t been any complaints about him because he was protected by a very entrenched liberal/gay alliance in his diocese. However, now that he’s been removed, I think the evil Weakland should be forced to shut up. He is ruthless in his attacks on the Pope.

Law’s case is more ambiguous, since he was not involved in any of the wrongdoing (most of which had occurred under his then deceased predecessor and some of which in fact had happened on the watch of an even earlier bishop) and was not in charge at that time, and in fact handled it according to the guidelines then in place. They were obviously not rigorous enough, since they were products of the 70s and 80s (like those lax sentencing laws in the secular system that let murderers and rapists out of prisons after a 15 minute sentence to kill again). Law became the target of the press in Massachusetts not because he was personally involved in the sexual abuse or really even in a “cover up,” but because he was perceived as conservative (by Massachusetts standards) and was very outspoken in his opposition to abortion.


29 posted on 03/28/2010 5:30:23 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos
Weakland and his minions are still spreading their poison even now.

Disgusting.
30 posted on 03/28/2010 6:21:49 AM PDT by Antoninus (It's a degenerate society where dogs have more legal rights than unborn babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Disgusting and vile indeed, particulary at the beginning of Holy Week. Perhaps, the Vatican can “fast track” a repudiation of his words and a “stripping” of the ‘emeritus’ title that he so dishonors?


31 posted on 03/28/2010 7:39:36 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: livius
Law was indeed guilty of covering up for priests like Geoghan since one of his own underlings wrote to Law about the priest's long history of homosexual predations.
Law admitted he knew of the accusations against Geoghan when Law reassigned Geoghan to another parish. But of course Law didn't inform this parish.

Whatever the failings of the news media, many and varied, they didn't produce and enable the cadre of persistent homosexual predator priests.

The 84 lawsuits brought against Law and the archdiocese were not brought by the victims because Law opposed abortion but because Law and others were complicit in the crimes committed.

So now Law lives in the Vatican with his salary and servants and Weakland is writing his memoirs.

32 posted on 03/28/2010 8:39:02 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

Well - when they bother to call me up and ask MY opinion? (LOL)

Men like that would be immediately stripped of their titles.

And maybe if the Church started doing things like that, they wouldn’t find themselves in the defensive position so often.


33 posted on 03/28/2010 12:19:45 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife
No doubt following the Scriptures would have salutary effects.
34 posted on 03/28/2010 12:41:43 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

F*&K the New York Times.


35 posted on 03/28/2010 9:14:33 PM PDT by GinaLolaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson