Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: djf

This is just a dumb question, but I am going to ask it anyway...

When I learned about the environmental laws one thing I recall standing out like a sore thumb was that the states had to adopt “at least” the federal level of regulation. They could not have laws less stringent than the fed, but they could have laws more stringent.

So why is 0bamacare any different? Is it because the environmental laws supposedly deal with shared resources? Which health care really isn’t a shared resource?


133 posted on 03/27/2010 5:14:29 AM PDT by EBH (Our First Right...."it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: EBH

That is a very good question.


135 posted on 03/27/2010 5:26:50 AM PDT by listenhillary (Capitalism = billions raised from poverty, Socialism = billions reduced to starvation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

To: EBH

It was probably a bribe. I mean the Feds offered so much in environmental cleanup funds that the states could hardly refuse.

But I would have to see the actual laws.


137 posted on 03/27/2010 5:31:06 AM PDT by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson