Posted on 03/25/2010 9:14:21 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
Link only, per FR posting rules
Well I know who you are & as for the rest well.....Stultus est sicut stultus facit. I am going to bed. Have horses to feed shortly & home schooling. Night TE & pay no attention to this bs.
Have a good night, pandy. I’m not bothered by it in the least so don’t worry about that. It was an exercise in exposing a disruptor troll. I’ve been doing it for almost ten years. ;-)
I know & I don’t worry. I just say to people who bother me DILLIGAF! I hear the brat up. Well I guess my day just started. I really didn’t think she was going to get up & start school this early. She wants to get to the barn. Hmmm maybe she will make breakfast lol. I better get off here before one mad Sassy comes on.
People don’t bother me. I just deal with them.
Remember that when Sassy calls to tell you about riding a new horse backwards. I promise to make sure she remembers the time difference!
Do you think I would blame her for what her mother lets her do or puts her up to? ;-)
"So, that's not the Constitution? Since when? Oh.. "
When you can't recognize obvious satire, give up. Obama just insulted members of the Supreme Court about their First Amendment decision at the State of the Union Address.
I didn't buy her book because I assumed it would contain much praise for McCain...didn't want to barf...
No, it's not in the Constitution. Don't be absurd.
Don't excerpt selectively newby. It's not becoming. The sarcasm should have been obvious to anyone.
Palin wrote a puff piece editorial for McCain. That's the least she could have done.
Well said!
LLS
Never thought I'd see that here on FR.
This is irrefutable true. In the 80s, as a U.S. Representative and later as Senator McCain was one of Reagan's most dependable conservative allies in Congress.
“You don’t have to be a looney to question why someone with such obvious conservative credentials would choose to continue to associate herself with someone who stands for all that is wrong and needs to be reformed about the Republican Party.”
You don’t have to be looney but the Paultards ARE looney. Her decision has been questioned and questioned ad nauseum. Her explanation for the endorsement-personal loyalty to her former running mate-is self evident. I accept it as do most conservatives on FR and others including Rush, Mark Levin and (incidentally) Jim Robinson. As far as I am concerned, it is a tempest in a teapot with which the Paul/ Mitt axis is trying(very unsuccessfully)to damage Palin.
“Oh my. “
Yeah!
She’s about THE MONEY! When will people “get it”. It’s about T H E .... M O N E Y !
“Like what, Sarah? Amnesty? Cap and tax? Bailouts? Voting against tax cuts? McCain-Feingold? “
No, all that other stuff........
Are you calling me a "RomneyBot" because I think McCain is a no-honor scumbag?
“I am not sure if Hayworth can carry Arizona.”
I’m not sure conservatives care what you think.
Another McCain-Palin post party! This one looks wilder than the last. First things first, where is the bar and the snacks before I mingle with the crowd?
And, what happened to comment #1 ? LOL (I saw it before it was canned ) Good thing rabs did a comment #2. Hint: see #120
Lol, it was refuted by Mark Levin, who was part of the Reagan administration and had no memory of McCain's soldiering. And Juan McCain was not elected to the House until 2002, AFTER Kemp-Roth, or the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981.
The great 'foot soldier' Juan McCain seems to have joined the Reagan ranks after Reagan's landmark legislation had already been passed.
Sorry, it's refutable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.