Posted on 03/25/2010 9:14:21 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
Link only, per FR posting rules
“Semantics have gotten in the way here, nothing more.”
Understood.
Oh yeah, they both have the same last name.
In the beginning stages of the Revolution there wasn’t a huge amoung of support for it - but, that changed as the war went on and people started believing there was a chance for victory.
I quite smoking 21+ years ago - BBQ’s, on the other hand ;-)
That was before he did another flip on some of his views.
Haven’t heard one more word of support nor any events
on her schedule for him.
At the time, Rockefeller (Standard Oil) had his own private police force that would beat up workers (i.e. kill) who helped other oil companies and also blow up their train tracks. He said this was fair competition. Take into account the sugar, steel, train, banking, and other monopolies and it was a racket.
Roosevelt focused on getting it to be a fair playing field.
Put into the mix novels such as The Jungle and it is a ripe time for an uprising. What we see today is similar which is people angry at the status quo. They see corruption at all levels.
No, I can’t make the arrangements to go.
I’m already making several trips this years and three are to CA.
Who did you vote for and why?”
(1) Baldwin - best option from a lousy field, although far from perfect.
(2) Because John McCain is a traitor to his country and Obama is a Marxist.
Couldn’t stomach voting for either of them.
What is a “caww” and who did you vote for and why?
I voted for Baldwin, also, Favor Center.....I could not vote for either of the Soros-funded McCain or Obama....their positions were not much different
My choice for Baldwin was based on National Security....he was the only one willing to do something about our porous borders......not perfect, but Baldwin was the best choice in that regard.
Palin has serious problems with her political judgement....after the election. I am always leery about someone John McCain associates with...even ones he is forced to associate with
JD for Senate
When Reagan was President the socialist in this country would not have dared to pull the things they’ve done since Jan 20, 2009. Back then it was inconceivable that things could get this bad - and sooo fast too.
ewwwwww why’d you ruin my sight with that!
I heard Ron Paul debate another party yesturday, he wants to legalize drugs. What an idiot!
The host asked him outright if he ever smoked weed...Ha! He paused and then quickly changed the subject...he was asked again....by then I was laughing so hard I didn’t quite get his his second attempt to change the subject.
CA would be a good place to avoid (or move away from - I’m going to start looking).
I have asked you repeatedly what this post meant and you won’t tell me, what is it about, why did you post it to me? If it was some kind of mistake, or meant for someone else or something, just say so, why are you beating around the bush for post after post?
To: ansel12
You mean a “big tent”?
Big tents are for clowns.
146 posted on Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:32:34 PM by NYCslicker
There are some on this thread who bash TR when they don’t have an appreciation for American history as their family were still in other countries when TR was President.
My great great grandfather was in New York City politics when TR was Gov. on NY and major Republican.
If she's going there for conservative rallies, though, that's EXCELLENT. Right in the enemy's back yard. :)
May very well be.
“Sometimes party loyalty asks too much” - John F. Kennedy
It helps explain Ron Paul’s sick views that support the enemy.
Quite a few of his cult are potheads.
And one-issue voters based on that.
“I heard Ron Paul debate another party yesturday, he wants to legalize drugs. What an idiot!”
Liberty is dangerous. I guess you are afraid of it.
If some idjit wants to poison themselves, is it Constitutional to stop them? Add in all the other Drug War spending and intrusion like no-knock raids, and you edge closer to a police state. I’m on the same page as Clarence Thomas, in this regard.
If you want to do something about drugs in this country, start with a wall on the southern border - maybe with minefields.
Governor Palin and Steve Forbes endorsed Rand Paul, he has opened up a large lead over his moderate opponent and there is no reason for Palin or Forbes to work their schedules to make an appearance at this time.
Baldwin, Paul, = Truthers and Kooks.
Baldwin articles were banned from here.
People who vote for either are malcontents and not serious voters.
Your criticisms would be meaningful if it weren’t for the fact that you are shilling for a political lightweight conspiracy fruitcake like “Dr.” Ron Paul.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.