The Associated Press writers are totally divorced from the concept of self-defense, or threats and kidnapping, and from any concept of practicality in dealing with violent criminals. Defense is regarded as the problem.
What will really cause violence is if defenders are blamed and prosecuted. Then there is no choice when attacked but to kill all the attackers, and abandon their bodies at sea, without reporting anything. It is weakness which encourages violence. Adequate strength deters violence.
1 posted on
03/24/2010 5:38:53 AM PDT by
docbnj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: docbnj
Every ship that sails through those waters should have firepower to blow these thugs out of the water.
To: docbnj
are the writers insane, or just pro-pirate?
Dead pirates means less violence.
3 posted on
03/24/2010 5:41:19 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
("Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." --Thomas Jefferson)
To: docbnj
That’s called shoot, sink, and shut up.
To: docbnj
damned sheep ... good thing the brave souls on Flight 93 didn’t think that way.
5 posted on
03/24/2010 5:43:40 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
("Shut it down" Rush Limbaugh, 3/3/10)
To: docbnj
Prompting Fears of Rise in ViolenceWow. So now defending yourself is just considered goading the pirates into more violence? Have they tried pouring gasoline on their socks....so the ants don't crawl up and get their candy ass?
6 posted on
03/24/2010 5:44:12 AM PDT by
Sax
To: docbnj
the handling of the "case"
Like all news reports out of the MSM, self-defense is considered a crime, and those who defend themselves should be in prison.
Liberals are evil.
7 posted on
03/24/2010 5:44:31 AM PDT by
stinkerpot65
(Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
To: docbnj
You know the Leftist crAP is on the Muslim marine terrorists’ side. They’ll never write a story like that about the terrorists but only the those who defender themselves from terrorism.
To: docbnj
If I were to bet on it, I’d say the defenders will be blamed and prosecuted.
9 posted on
03/24/2010 5:45:35 AM PDT by
ElayneJ
To: docbnj
This is a non-sequitur.
Killing violent criminals results in fewer violent criminals and less violence.
12 posted on
03/24/2010 5:47:29 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
To: docbnj
I would be willing to bet that this is the last ship that pirate tries to hijack.
13 posted on
03/24/2010 5:48:08 AM PDT by
Hoodat
(For the weapons of our warfare are mighty in God for pulling down strongholds.)
To: docbnj
Kill one pirate, one less pirate. Kill ten pirates, ten less pirates. Kill all the pirates, no more pirates. Seems simple to me.
As a bonus, if you kill all the pirates there will be little recruitment. If the result of your career choice is sudden death, you might reconsider your choices. Even a prospective pirate can understand that.
14 posted on
03/24/2010 5:48:23 AM PDT by
Former Proud Canadian
(How do I change my screen name now that we have the most conservative government in the world?)
To: docbnj
15 posted on
03/24/2010 5:48:38 AM PDT by
Oratam
To: docbnj
Screw the AP and their ilk!
These contractors should be commended and their contracts should have performance bonuses written in for the number of pirates and pirate ships/boats killed or sunk. Also the lesser the quantity of ammo used to do the job the bigger the bonus too.
16 posted on
03/24/2010 5:49:29 AM PDT by
OldMissileer
(Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
To: docbnj
It’s their presupposition that is the problem. Their presupposition is that ... “all violence is bad, an increase in violence is bad”
Not all violence is bad. How it is applied can be quite good. I think the AP is run by a bunch of women with masters in education.
To: docbnj
It is good to see shippers take self defense more seriously. Only by killing the pirates will they be able to do their jobs.
Now watch for some do-gooder liberal to have the victims brought up on criminal charges.
What will really cause violence is if defenders are blamed and prosecuted. Then there is no choice when attacked but to kill all the attackers, and abandon their bodies at sea, without reporting anything.
Not a bad idea!
18 posted on
03/24/2010 5:55:44 AM PDT by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: docbnj
Who prosecutes the ship’s defenders, when the incident happens on the high seas?? Maybe Obama can find a use for Gitmo, after all. He could capture them and send them there.
19 posted on
03/24/2010 6:02:19 AM PDT by
norwaypinesavage
(Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
To: docbnj
20 posted on
03/24/2010 6:05:19 AM PDT by
palmer
(Cooperating with Obama = helping him extend the depression and implement socialism.)
To: docbnj
sighted somali, shot same
To: docbnj
What missing (so far) is the contractors video taping the event(s).. polishing them thru editing and selling the videos for further (maybe greater) profits.. maybe they could provide this service FOR FREE...
Call it............ Pirate Porn...
** maybe trolling the pirates as shark bait.. call it "Pirates Jumping the Shark"... as one episode.. Theres a lot of room for creativity..
27 posted on
03/24/2010 6:12:16 AM PDT by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
To: docbnj
28 posted on
03/24/2010 6:12:41 AM PDT by
FReepaholic
(Are Christians allowed to eat deviled eggs?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson