Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/23/2010 7:00:58 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: SeekAndFind

Lying sacks of excrement like this need a beatdown.
Yes, I’m in a fowl mood.


2 posted on 03/23/2010 7:02:12 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The writer of this article refers to this study bu the Kaiser Family Foundation :

http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/upload/8058-F.pdf


3 posted on 03/23/2010 7:02:15 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Well if U.S. News says it’s true it must be...right?


4 posted on 03/23/2010 7:03:03 AM PDT by NMEwithin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Where is the barf alert?


5 posted on 03/23/2010 7:03:06 AM PDT by Judith Anne (2012 Sarah Palin/Duncan Hunter 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

This is my favorite:

“3) Doctors will revolt... What will they do? Become accountants?”

HAHA! We got you MDs! You can’t quit because you HAVE NO CHOICE!


6 posted on 03/23/2010 7:03:32 AM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I keep reading that “there’s no “public option” in the current plan” but...what happens when someone who can not afford insurance is required by law to buy a plan?

I could solve homelessness by requiring everyone buy a house.
I could solve hunger by requiring everyone to buy food.


7 posted on 03/23/2010 7:03:41 AM PDT by icwhatudo ("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the existing Constitution"Obama Adviser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The MSM is on a full court press to shill for this. Of course they are not paying the bills.


8 posted on 03/23/2010 7:04:01 AM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Mr. Newman is obviously an Obamist.


9 posted on 03/23/2010 7:04:55 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I saw this quote on an anti-obamacare facebook page:

A wise man said this “So we just passed a health care plan written by a committee whose chairman says he didn’t understand it, passed by a Congress that exempts themselves from it, signed by a President who smokes, with funding administered by a treasury chief who didn’t pay his taxes, all to be overseen by a surgeon general who is obese, and financed by a country that’s broke?”


10 posted on 03/23/2010 7:05:37 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Wrong on so many levels. I’ll tackle just one. Most of
my colleagues I have spoken with are planning their exit strategies. I have heard everything from MBA school to other (a quilt shop for me) to out and out retirement. You will see docs leaving practice in droves over the next 4 years


12 posted on 03/23/2010 7:05:46 AM PDT by Mom MD (Jesus is the Light of the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“will reduce government deficits by $143 billion through 2019, thanks to new taxes and fees”

Yeah, thanks. Sounds like a great cost saving plan.


14 posted on 03/23/2010 7:06:52 AM PDT by coaltrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

MSM drinking the kool-aid. This writer is lapping it up by the gallon...


15 posted on 03/23/2010 7:07:24 AM PDT by Lurking in Kansas (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Starting now, taxes are going to be collected to offset the costs of Obamacare that doesn't kick in for 4 years.

What happens to that money today? Does it go into a lock-box with sign that says "Do not open until 2014"?

That is a rhetorical question.

16 posted on 03/23/2010 7:07:36 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
If you have doubts, consider the attitude of professional investors, who would stand to lose a lot if the government took over healthcare. They don't exactly seem worried. Shares of health insurers like Aetna, UnitedHealth, Wellpoint, and Cigna—subject to the strongest new rules under reform—have outperformed the stock market over the past year.

This must be a released democrat talking point because I've seen it brought up a number of times on liberal sites and news. Well, those investors could be stupid, for one. But more likely they are remembering that Obama cut backroom deals to give huge coin to the insurance industry as I recall.

17 posted on 03/23/2010 7:08:07 AM PDT by highlander_UW (Happiness doesn't come from owning something; it comes from being a part of something)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Why does Barack Obama need a White House communications staff, when he such such an obscenely compliant media that will happily carry his water on virtually every policy matter?


21 posted on 03/23/2010 7:09:16 AM PDT by OldDeckHand (USA - b. July 4, 1776 / d. March 21, 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

This is written by a snarky liberal. Who does he think doctors are, all 30 years olds? No many are 45+ years, have made money and still can be earn living outside of their practice. Many can and will cut out if they are put in a position where their earnings do not reflect their work.


24 posted on 03/23/2010 7:11:20 AM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The liberal mentality: Fight those damned facts with lies.


26 posted on 03/23/2010 7:11:52 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“The Congressional Budget Office—which is probably the most reliable, nonpartisan number-crunching outfit in Washington”

LOL.


28 posted on 03/23/2010 7:12:04 AM PDT by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The fact is that the charade of collecting taxes for four years, before any “benefits” kick in is a massive charade that people still do not understand.

The Congress is not collecting premiums for four years and banking them to pay for future benefits; the money that is collected will be spent, and when it is time to start paying for those benefits in 2914, the cries for a new funding source will be overwhelming.

Charles Krauthammer was talking about this very thing, and in his view this will drive making a National Value Added Tax (VAT) one of the major issues for the 2012 Presidential race...


29 posted on 03/23/2010 7:12:22 AM PDT by Bean Counter (I keeps mah feathers numbered, for just such an emergency...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The U Snews is hardly a reliable source these days. All they do is report the Obama mantra!


30 posted on 03/23/2010 7:12:22 AM PDT by ImpBill ("America ... where are you now?" signed, a little "r" republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson