Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

If you have read the bill and know of other violations, please add to the list.
1 posted on 03/22/2010 6:04:03 PM PDT by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: JimWayne; Travis McGee

Good thread to start....thanks !


2 posted on 03/22/2010 6:07:19 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimWayne
Check this out: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2477323/posts

XIV Amendment?

3 posted on 03/22/2010 6:07:39 PM PDT by Michael Barnes (Call me when the bullets start flying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimWayne

Wonderful list. Thank you. But how are you seeing the application of the fifth amendment?


4 posted on 03/22/2010 6:08:03 PM PDT by MrChips (MrChips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimWayne

Our providers won’t have to worry about handing out all that privacy information any more.


5 posted on 03/22/2010 6:08:39 PM PDT by oyez (The difference in genius and stupidity is that genius has it limits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimWayne

Mark


6 posted on 03/22/2010 6:10:01 PM PDT by Czar (NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimWayne

I believe the bill DID originate in the House. Wasn’t it originally an unrelated bill which was gutted, then used as a vehicle for the legislation, and then sent back to the House for passage?


7 posted on 03/22/2010 6:11:08 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimWayne

What I want to know is what court cases are being filed... because that’s where it’s at, if something is Unconstitutional... doncha know...


8 posted on 03/22/2010 6:11:08 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimWayne
To me it is a matter of US Constitution Section 8 (Powers of Congress). Anything not given to Congress as a power The 10th Amendment says it goes to the State .

Under the Federalist system our Founding Fathers gave us, Congress had very few powers (Article 1 Section 8 US Constitution), everything else goes to the State (10th Amendment).

Article 1 section 8 does not give Congress the power to get involved in insurance or a doctor's treatment to his patients. This is clearly a State issue.

9 posted on 03/22/2010 6:11:19 PM PDT by GregoTX (I am the resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimWayne

9th Amendment.


10 posted on 03/22/2010 6:11:31 PM PDT by NoobRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimWayne

bookmark


11 posted on 03/22/2010 6:13:06 PM PDT by jcsjcm (American Patriot - follow the Constitution and in God we Trust - Laus Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimWayne; AliVeritas; holdonnow

FYI


13 posted on 03/22/2010 6:15:04 PM PDT by mojo114 (Forward to November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimWayne

Why dont we just throw the whole constitution at them and let them try and explain which article they didnt violate?


14 posted on 03/22/2010 6:17:12 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimWayne

I wonder about the law that pre-existing conditions have to be covered. I know there are strictly defined anti-discrimination laws, but I don’t think a protected group would include people with pre-existing conditions. Can the federal (or state for that matter) government force a business to sell something to someone if by selling it, the business incurs a loss?

Is there any part of this bill that limits the amount of the premium insurance companies charge to cover pre-existing conditions? If not, than what’s to prevent companies from charging $100,000/year in premiums to cover people like this or what actuaries would deem would be a sufficient amount to cover this group?


16 posted on 03/22/2010 6:19:43 PM PDT by randita (Sarah Palin has the same computer that I have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimWayne

Geraldo won’t understand this.


17 posted on 03/22/2010 6:19:51 PM PDT by optiguy (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.----- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimWayne

Exempting Congresscritters and even some of their staffers violates the equal protection clause of Amendment XIV.


18 posted on 03/22/2010 6:19:53 PM PDT by Campion ("President Barack Obama" is an anagram for "An Arab-backed imposter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimWayne

Thanks for the list. It’s great.

Now, comrades.. Sorry, but I cannot resist... What oath of office do the members of Congress take again? something about preserving, protecting and defending the Constitution or did they change that to the Communist Manifesto with one of those underhanded amendments? Those sneaky devils.


19 posted on 03/22/2010 6:25:34 PM PDT by dajeeps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimWayne
If you have read the bill and know of other violations, please add to the list.

13th Amendment - Involuntary Servitude.

No, this is NOT like the income tax, social security and all the other federal "mandates" - because THEY all justify themselves by claiming to take a portion of your voluntary activity.

This is not a trivial distinction - it is THE fundamental way the Federal government has claimed the legal power to insert itself into people's personal lives.

In contrast, this healthcare bill taxes you - for the very first time in 223 years of American Constitutional history - on the basis of your EXISTENCE, not your activity.

That's involuntary servitude, period.

20 posted on 03/22/2010 6:28:01 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimWayne

Doesn’t mean squat to these pigs.


21 posted on 03/22/2010 6:28:12 PM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimWayne

There’s something else too...

The gov’t will want to “control” costs so now they will attempt to tell you what is healthy and what is not, what to eat, what to do.

This is a violation of our privacy.


24 posted on 03/22/2010 6:33:57 PM PDT by rbosque (11 year Freeper! Combat Economist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JimWayne

Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

The penalties are excessive because the requirement is excess.

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Taken with the 10th it Constitutionally limits the interstate commerce clause to enumerated powers not any general welfare canard.


25 posted on 03/22/2010 6:34:12 PM PDT by DaveyB (Alcohol ,Tobacco and Firearms should be a convenience store not a bureaucracy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson