Skip to comments.
Daily Kos in full-on pants-wetting meltdown over “Motions to Recommit”
Hillbuzz ^
| 3/20/10
| Hillbuzz guys
Posted on 03/20/2010 7:46:45 PM PDT by Daisyjane69
If you ever thought we didnt love you, we hope today proves you wrong, because we just read a piece over at Daily Kos for you. It was icky. We had to take a shower afterwards, with that stinky antibacterial soap to kill all the orange germs. Kos is a very nasty, rotten place, but we got a tip they were in full-on pants-wetting meltdown mode over Motions to Recommit and wanted to know what the fuss was about.
(Excerpt) Read more at hillbuzz.org ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhohealthcare; dailykos; healthcare; hillbuzz; kos; koskiddies; koskids; koskooks; strategy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
They're at it again! LOL
To: Daisyjane69
Were they a Leaning No or Leaning Yes?
2
posted on
03/20/2010 7:50:35 PM PDT
by
akapossumdawg
(There's three types of people, those that can count and those that cannot...)
To: Daisyjane69
Who knows what Republicans are up to. Nobody ever got rich betting Republicans would show spine, save the day, and do the right thing
not when theres any option at all to crumble, melt into soggy pools, and back away from everything they believe in so that maybe just maybe the media affection they seek so desperately might come their way for a moment. Will they use the Motions to Recommit to lay the foundation for the ouster of every Democrat in office.We sure hope so.
Here's to hope...
3
posted on
03/20/2010 7:50:46 PM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(III, Oathkeeper)
To: Daisyjane69
I love the double irony;
The Liberal Lion Ted Kennedy dies and his replacement is the 41st vote against Obamacare.
The ONLY issue on which Democrats refuse to budge - abortion - may well cost them their precious ObamaCare.
4
posted on
03/20/2010 7:51:23 PM PDT
by
TexasNative2000
(This seems like fairly decisive evidence that the dream can, in fact, die.)
To: Daisyjane69
“...we got a tip they were in full-on pants-wetting meltdown mode over Motions to Recommit and wanted to know what the fuss was about...”
Okay, so why don’t you tell us about it? I don’t want to go there - I hate getting cooties!
5
posted on
03/20/2010 7:51:30 PM PDT
by
SatinDoll
(NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
To: Daisyjane69
Relax. The Repubs are too cowardly to ever do this.
6
posted on
03/20/2010 7:52:13 PM PDT
by
pabianice
To: Dead Corpse
Don’t ask a Republican leader what they are doing. It like asking Ernest T Bass what day it is. The response may scare you...
7
posted on
03/20/2010 7:53:36 PM PDT
by
akapossumdawg
(There's three types of people, those that can count and those that cannot...)
To: SatinDoll
You gotta read Hillbuzz’ entire post, ladybug. They lay it all out so we don’t have to get all icky going over to Daily Kooks site. LOL
Gotta find a way to get this to Boehner or Cantor. heh
8
posted on
03/20/2010 7:54:05 PM PDT
by
Daisyjane69
(Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
To: Daisyjane69
What is a likely motion to recommit gonna be?
Do you support the $500 billion reduction in Medicare benefits that this bill includes?
Do you support having taxpayers pay for abortions that this bill includes?
How many motions can we make????
9
posted on
03/20/2010 7:55:07 PM PDT
by
Principled
(Get the capital back! NRST!)
To: pabianice
Typically, but in this situation they have a chance to save the day for the vast majority of very angry americans. It does not take much courage to side with the majority, in fact it takes none at all. They just might do it since there is virtually no risk to them at all, only huge gains in public opinion.
10
posted on
03/20/2010 7:55:18 PM PDT
by
HerrBlucher
("When the national government and Congress start going wild, it's up the states to rein them in.")
To: TexasNative2000
The ONLY issue on which Democrats refuse to budge - abortion - may well cost them their precious ObamaCare. I love this irony too. You have a guy like Stupak, who is clearly a socialist, and yet he appears sincerely committed to the sanctity of life. Maybe God really is involved here.
11
posted on
03/20/2010 7:55:19 PM PDT
by
outofstyle
(Anti-socialist)
To: Daisyjane69
This is why these “YES” votes are turning into “NO.”
There are some Democrats who will sacrifice their term in office for this bill but a lot of them will not. Self preservation will be key and seeing Obama’s ratings tank, the Dems will be fleeing from the Obama Titanic very soon.
12
posted on
03/20/2010 7:56:02 PM PDT
by
truthandlife
("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
To: Principled
I dunno.
Might have to take one for the team and go into the cootie bag that is Daily Kooks.
13
posted on
03/20/2010 7:56:30 PM PDT
by
Daisyjane69
(Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
To: Daisyjane69
If you promise to burn your clothes afterward
here's the link...
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/3/20/848245/-On-Motions-to-Recommit-and-their-danger-to-health-care
To: sickoflibs
To: Dead Corpse
Yes. Ever since 01/21/2009 I get up every morning and hope that things will change.
16
posted on
03/20/2010 7:57:58 PM PDT
by
Jemian
(They're all a bunch of scoundrels!)
To: Daisyjane69
OK, what IS a motion to recommit?
17
posted on
03/20/2010 7:58:26 PM PDT
by
gidget7
("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
To: Dead Corpse
So does that mean O actual did bring Hope? Now lets see some yes’s Change to NO’s.
18
posted on
03/20/2010 7:58:58 PM PDT
by
jafojeffsurf
(Return to the Constitution)
To: Daisyjane69
It’s probably a regressive part of my character showing, but this story brings cheer.
19
posted on
03/20/2010 7:59:29 PM PDT
by
Track9
(A good education is knowing what truly sets you free.. and then crushing liberals with it)
To: Daisyjane69
Boehner said he is going to do this. I hope he sticks to his word and uses Rahm’s ‘rule’ against them. It would be too sweet.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson