Posted on 03/18/2010 7:11:08 AM PDT by GOPGuide
Looks like the Palin support might be paying off for McCain.
It should be noted that McCain has aggressively endorsed and campaigned for people like Scott Brown and it would not surprise me in the least that part of the agreement was to have them campaign for McCain if asked.
If you were Scott Brown back in December, how do you refuse?
So, I see the endorsement game as part of a “scratch-my-back-I’ll-scratch-yours” agreement that honorable people will choose to honor. Secondly, those in the Senate club protect their own which is why Senate Republicans choose Specter over Toomey, etc. Should they endorse the challenger and the incumbent still wins, the incumbent then has ammunition by which to punish some future legislative goals. It’s why Cornyn goes out of his way to support incumbent Republicans, even RINOs.
To me, political endorsements are like newspaper endorsements. Their only benefit to me is to tell me who I should vote against.
I’ve only skimmed all the comments here, so correct me if I missed it, but where is the conversation on exactly HOW JD is conservative?
He’s against amnesty. K. Got it.
But he’s a HUGE pork barreller!
And in 2003 he voted with his party, like a dead fish going with the flow, on Medicare Part D, the largest expansion of an entitlement program since Medicare itself passed in the 60s.
That’s your idea of a conservative?
McCain, on economic principle, voted against his party and against this unfunded mandate.
I must ask you:
What is the primary concern in this country right now?
A. Stopping the out of control spending, which is seriously jeopardizing us with all the financial rating companies, is keeping us in this recession, is preventing job creation, etc. etc?
B. Amnesty?
If you answer b, then Hayworth is your guy. Oh. And you’re also seriously out of touch with what is the primary problem in the country right now.
That doesn’t mean illegal immigration is not a problem; but priorities, people!!
Hayworth will not help the economy if he behaves and votes as he has in his past elected office.
It's not awful. It's backed up by plenty of evidence. Women admit as much themselves. If this doesn't apply to you, then you have no reason to be offended on behalf of the emotional women voters.
In addition, many here would not have voted for Reagan based on some of his tax and abortion votes as gov of California, and some of his endorsements and campaigning choices, too.
Let alone his choosing of Bush 1 for his VP and his campaigning for his presidential run.
BTW, if you excuse Reagan’s stumping for Bush’s presidential campaign as loyalty, then I’d think you’d be intellectually honest enough to recognize that Palin’s doing the same thing for McCain now ...
The difference between McCain’s 48% and Rick Perry’s was Debra Medina. It was a three-way race and Medina was polling between 15-20%. Once Medina eliminated herself with her truther comments, the fall-off split between Perry and KBH. AFAIK, there is no Medina in the Arizona race to serve as spoiler. It’s just one-vs-one and Hutchison was never close to Perry.
Five months is a long way to go and McCain is going to have several votes to cast and several speeches to give in which he might say/vote something that causes him to lose support. If there’s a debate, I hope Hayworth can hammer the amnesty issue.
rat...it's the new conservatism.
Can’t wait for debates, ol’ McPain doesn’t take or toss mud well.
Go JD!
GO JD!
SWEET! Will Sarah wake up and read the tea leaves on this? She could still graciously back out - you know, claim she’s got a recently developing ‘issue’ she’s got to deal with.
“He HELPED to PUT Obama in the White House!!!”
And then he tried to tell us we had nothing to fear from him! What?!
Yes. He said he was a “good family man”.
That’s only true if your family is the Sopranos.
“Gibbs for Liar of the United States! LOTUS”
The LOTUS of the TOTUS.
There’s no lib bias with Rasmussen. He’s straight-up and thoroughly enjoys his reputation as the best pollster in the country.
Seven points at this stage of the game is about as grim as it could be for McQueeg. This is terrific news.
“She [Palin] is on VERY thin ice with me on this one.”
Plus, she’s on the wrong side of the TEApublican momentum...hope she changes her mind...she needs to be with us...
TEApublicans will lead this next chapter - THANK YOU.
“I love Sarah, bought her book & now she is using my support to help McCain.”
Honestly, we should probably all go over to her Facebook page and make these comments - maybe that would help her to see the light? Dunno - she’s got 1.5 million fans...
http://www.facebook.com/sarahpalin
LOL.....exactly!
“I actually thought it was closer than this.”
But closing from the last polling - and WAY different from McLame’s initial polling released when JD jumped in several weeks ago.
Hmmm, interesting, then how do you suppose that JD got a 98% ACU rating while McCain only got 63%?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.