Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

Yup, I think we’ve all experienced politicians that proved that business experience does not equal political smarts (Hello, Ross Perot).

But this IS Kalifornia we’re talking about - and in the Land of the Blind, even a one-eyed man (or woman) is still King.

Let’s at least hear what she has to say.


20 posted on 03/17/2010 10:57:59 AM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: canuck_conservative; DoughtyOne

Are you in CA?

Your moniker is canuck, your homepage is flying a Canadian flag.

Do you have any idea on how the Sacramento politics game is played?

They’re going to have her for a snack, not even an entree. She’s that naive and inexperienced with CA politics.

She’s not even close to being the type of governor CA needs right now. She’s timid, won’t debate, keeps herself at arms distance from many radio and tv shows.

I don’t trust her and I’m one of many who’s going to be paying the price if this spineless RINO gets elected.

Are you going to be paying the price alongside those of us in CA?


21 posted on 03/17/2010 11:05:45 AM PDT by SZonian (We began as a REPUBLIC, a nation of laws. We became a DEMOCRACY, majority rules. Next step is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative

What bothers me about people like Whitman and MeCain, is that they only tell you part of the story. During an election year John MeCain sounds like a solid guy. Then you’re stuck with the ass for the next five years, until they go into election mode again.

It seems I may have been wrong with regard to Whitman’s voting record. As the following linked article mentions, it was reported she had not vote before. She objected and mentions that she certainly did vote in 1984 and 1988. She vote for Reagan and Bush respectively.

What is curious about that claim, is that it evidently wasn’t important enough for her to vote against Carter in 1980. And that leads one to wonder if she voted for Carter or didn’t vote that year.

Wasn’t that an important year to vote? Weren’t all the years since 1988 important election years?

I also note that her response was that she did vote in 84 and 88, but didn’t say something like, ‘I always vote’ or ‘I voted in every presidential election’.

What would your response be. Since being of age, I have voted in every election held, with the exception of about three local elections in my lifetime.

I consider it my civic duty. It seems to me that Meg doesn’t share that view.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?entry_id=49948


22 posted on 03/17/2010 11:08:12 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (If we as Republicans can't clean up our house, who can or will? Just say no to MeCain(D).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: canuck_conservative; SZonian
But this IS Kalifornia we’re talking about -

California has an economy as large as your entire country of Kanada.

What's that say about Kanada?

25 posted on 03/17/2010 11:18:27 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson