Posted on 03/15/2010 9:08:56 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
No doubt, “float” being the operative word here...
Talk about getting ready to fight the last war, rather than the next.
The Russian Navy needs an SSGN for what exactly?
Said differently, couldn’t this money be better spent on say... anything in the world other than an SSGN?
Among the many reasons why we should immediately open up *all* our known (and suspected) oil reserves is that doing so would cause an immediate,sharp drop in oil prices...thus denying dangerous states like Iran,Venezuela and the USSR the ability to buy thousands of jets,missiles,subs,etc.
There are now so many subs in the ocean that it represents a naval buildup not seen since just prior to World War I, with its battleships.
33 nations are believed to have submarine warships. China and the US alone both have about 65-70 each. Many other nations have purchased very quiet diesel electric boats that represent a serious threat to surface ships.
This suggests that there is soon going to be a major push for submarine killing technologies.
Successor to the Oscar II?
And most likely made of Titanium which they have a lot of.
That looks like a Typhoon.
Ya mean “submarine finding” technology don’t ya?
After all, killing subs is the easy part of ASW - finding ‘em is the hard part.
Hold on Russia is launching a 17 year old sub and this is worrisome? Do you work for Northrup Grumman or something?
“very quiet diesel”
This term is like saying “conservative democrat”
We have the best fleet money can buy and we some are worried about cheap diesel electric boats. I guess these people have never heard of SOSUS. It is so sensitive it can hear a whale fart.
http://www.navy.mil/navydata/cno/n87/usw/issue_25/sosus.htm
Jack of all trades, master of none.
Aren’t our own submarine forces being modified in such a multi-role manner?
SSBNs converted to modified attack boats with Spec Ops delivery capability?
Virginia-class subs with modular systems, capable of both the attack and missile-role?
You are ignorant. That is all.
Yes. We are modifying existing platforms for new roles.
We aren’t making new platforms with self-conflicting roles.
Plus eliminate any obstacles on coal-to-gasoline production, and engage in a massive program to build nuke power plants. The FRENCH, for God's sake, have been getting 70% of their power from nukes for decades. We can and should as well.
I thought the Virginia class was specifically designed for “modularity”?
I think the Norwegians might know a thing or two about “very (VERY) quiet” diesel/electric subs.
Diesel is a descriptor for genre of sub that also has batteries. Incredibly quiet.
The Swedes have one that allegedly ran circles around us off San Diego recently.
I always wonder what it is in the Ruskie military mentality to build every thing so dang over sized? Penis envy?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.