Posted on 03/12/2010 2:31:12 PM PST by HD1200
What are Democratic leaders saying? “If you pass the Stupak amendment, more children will be born, and therefore it will cost us millions more. That’s one of the arguments I’ve been hearing,” Stupak says. “Money is their hang-up. Is this how we now value life in America? If money is the issue — come on, we can find room in the budget. This is life we’re talking about.” If Obamacare passes, Stupak says, it could signal the end of any meaningful role for pro-life Democrats within their own party. “It would be very, very hard for someone who is a right-to-life Democrat to run for office,” he says.
(Excerpt) Read more at corner.nationalreview.com ...
I had to delete the duplicated part and the font is funny.
I need to figure out what’s wrong!
I have an idea. Lets genocide all the current Dems, Homos, Feminazis, and Libs. That ought to cut down on the population! /sarc
I have noticed that most of the people in the groups you named don’t seem to get around to reproducing, and for that we can be thankful.
Thanks. Let’s stop this beast of a bill.
In Demonrats minds: The handicapped (mental and physical), Christians, Jews, and Heterosexuals.
The evil these monsters embrace is incredible. May they come to see the error of their ways and embrace love rather than the evil they hold so dear.
If they were honest, they would just pay for sterilization of minorities.
1) cheaper in the long run. Sterilization is a one time cost but abortions can be had in unlimited volume.
2) no babies to pay for..therefore very cheap.
3) Blacks are 13% of the population and have 56% of abortions therefore this is the target population.
Read between the lines....basically they want the power to say who can be born and who won’t be born. I DO NOT trust them!
“That really shows the condition of their souls... rotten.”
I think they no longer posses their souls, they were sold long ago to the evil one in return for power.
The issue really has been all along about who pays for all the new babies that do not have two parents and sufficient means to care for them. At least we have some Democrats left with some degree of moral value. But lets face it. We the tax payers pay for all the babies born out of wedlock etc..
Yup. I’d hate to be in their shoes when they cash their chips.
Part of the reason health care premiums will HAVE to increase over the next 2 to 3 generations is due to LESS babies being born.
I’ve done my part. I’ll have 7 children entering the work force just when America is going to desperately need productive taxpaying workers to support the huge number of retirees.
If we were concerned for our economic future, we’d be encouraging families to have MORE babies.
The more they talk, the more absurd this whole thing becomes.
The pro-life dems are not budging.
The argument is stupid, because the babies will pay a LOT more in taxes and premiums than they are likely to collect in health care.
The real key is to make sure we kill off the old and infirmed people. We need more young, healthy people to overpay their premiums so we can get cheap health care for middle-age democrat artists who don’t want to have to work for a living.
Don’t worry, the illegals and Muslims will still breed like rabbits.
What souls?
EXACTLY!!!
Is there no end to this atrocity?
Post #33 you nailed it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.