Orly Taitz Approves Threats Against Judge's Grandchildren

OC Weekly ^ | 03/10/2010 | Spencer Kornhaber

[BuckeyeTexan]

We really, really wanted to take a break from writing about Orly Taitz today. It appears she's trying to get our attention, though. And maybe the police's as well.

The screen-shot posted above is one left on a recent blog post of hers. The judge mentioned is Royce C. Lamberth, who is assigned to her Taitz v. Obama lawsuit in Washington D.C. Taitz didn't write the comment, but her blog is moderated: No comments can be made public unless Taitz okay's them.

It's not like Taitz allows every comment to be made public. There are plenty of Taitz-critical comments left that never see the light of day. So Taitz or someone who works for her made the decision to publish a reader's comment about threatening a judge's grandchildren with murder. This should play well in Taitz's run for office.

Elsewhere on OrlyTaitzEsq.com--which we recommend you don't visit unless you've got some heavy-duty malware blocking software--we have the Laguna Niguel dentist lashing out against local media. Specifically, the local media that you are reading right now:

[TigersEye]

No, I wouldn’t have to believe that at all. There’s no logic to that thought.

[Uncle Chip]

I have never, not one time, defended Obama’s refusal to clear up questions about his eligibility.

Other than post after post demean and ridicule and try to discourage "birthers" from pursuing the issue.

Perhaps you need to take some time off and go back and review your post history. I think you have early alzheimers --

[presently no screen name]

Thanks for the info. I have never been to her site - I gather it’s not too busy then and shut down during off work hours for only one person moderating it. God forbid the admin misses something - considering Barry’s boys are watching her like hawks!

[BuckeyeTexan]

How can it be a smear tactic if Orly allowed the comment to be published? Or for the sake of argument, assume that her site was hacked and someone published the comment without her consent. Why does she allow it to remain? (Hint: Publicity. Orly’s an attention whore. She’ll do the typical liberal dance of claiming victimhood.)

The comment advocates violence against the innocent grandchildren of a federal judge. There’s simply no excuse for the comment to remain up no matter who posted it or why.

[Quix]

Sigh.

I wonder . . . did the PTB set her up to destroy the whole issue?

[mojitojoe]

[algernonpj]

Has anyone found a link to the article that the screen print is supposed to represent? I haven’t.

[TigersEye]

You’ll have to forgive me I’m still bringing my caffeine levels up to normal and my acronym translator hasn’t kicked in for the day yet. What is PTB?

[mojitojoe]

You’re Orly obsession is freaky. I never think about Orly or care what she does. You have OT derangement syndrome.

[algernonpj]

She allowed the comment to be published. She hasn’t removed it. Why not?

Please post the link to the article in the screen print.

[OafOfOffice]

Isn’t it interesting that OCWeekly has a heading of “The Hilarious Haters?” What is hilarious about haters? And who has divided and brought more hate to America than obama and his bots?

[Quix]

Powers that be . . . globalists et al

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

“She should be disbarred, fined, and imprisoned.”

For goofing up on an edit?

[Cicero]

How long was that post up? I would imagine that some leftist provocateur posted it, and then turned himself in to OC Weekly. Or maybe one of the staffers at OC Weekly posted it.

Frankly, it sounds a lot more like the stuff that you see in one of those left wing hell holes than anything a conservative would post.

And it’s not unknown for leftist drivel to be posted here in FR. The worst stuff gets scrubbed, but it’s hard to keep track of all of it.

[TigersEye]

I'm going to have to join in the request for a decent source link. You post a link from some blog and warn us that it may be full of malware and provide no link to Taitz' website to see the original.

Maybe this thread should be moved to chat or pulled altogether. It barely rises to the level of a vanity post.

[TigersEye]

Ah, OK. That’s rather general since there are probably many groups that could be called PTB. But to answer your question, yes, that may be. Or she’s just nuttier than squirrel poop.

[OafOfOffice]

Because you want to rant here and make everyone believe she okays each posts we are suppose to believe you?

When Orly says she allowed it then I will believe it. The person who posted it needs to be outed. With groups like 4 chan who can take over whole websites, I don’t put anything past obsessed stalkers online.

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

They pre-approve postings. I’m assuming they got sloppy.

[OafOfOffice]

I found it and had no problem with my virus alerting me. Poster is from AliPac.

Update on DC case

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=8694

http://www.alipac.us/ftopic-137238-.html

MinutemanCDC_SC

ALIPAC Hero Elite

Check this also. Seems Kornhaber is as obsessed as buckeye with Orly. Too bad these people ask nothing of Obama but attack regularly those who have no elected power.

http://24ahead.com/spencer-kornhaber-misleads-about-obama-citizenship-issue-cha

That said, Kornhaber’s article is yet another attempt to smear those who have questions about this issue and lump all who have questions together. And, like all the other “debunking” articles, it’s based on misleading claims.