Posted on 03/11/2010 5:09:19 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
Success of lone gunmen may shift al-Qaida strategy
By LOLITA C. BALDOR, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON – On Christmas Day, a passenger on a Northwest Airlines flight bound for Detroit tried to blow up the plane with plastic explosives in his underwear. He failed, yet the very attempt shook the U.S. government, set federal agencies against each other and triggered months of political second-guessing.
In fact, short of mass casualties, the attack allegedly attempted by Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab had exactly the kind of reaction that al-Qaida is after. And, it appears, that lesson is resonating with the terror network's leadership.
For the first time, the group that carried out the Sept. 11 attacks and has prided itself on its ideological purism seems to be eyeing a more pragmatic and arguably more dangerous shift in tactics. The emerging message appears to be: Big successes are great, but sometimes simply trying can be just as good.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
Look for an islamic jihad mass shooter in the USA.
Look for his gun to be traced to the so-called “gun show loophole,” and a crackdown on buying adn selling guns that leads to virtual registration.
Surprised that hasn’t happened already.
Me too.
Whatever we do, we can't overreact by allowing citizens to carry weapons or allowing military members to be armed while on base. If people are allowed to defend themselves, who knows what problems it would cause. Trust the government to protect us. They know what's best. They'll take care of us.
Malvo was close. So was Hasan.
True.
Gee, I don’t have a degree from Harvard or Yale, I have never worked a day in Washington, I don’t belong to any Think Tanks...and yet I was able to figure this one out after Ft. Hood.
I still think we will see an episode like what happened in the hotel in India or something in a Mall. Probably not in a state with CC though.
A citizens "Rules of Engagement" are much different than the military's.
The Soviets saw our gun owning society as a real problem for a potential invader.
Abdulmutallab's own father sent a warning that his son was like to commit a terrosist attack and it was ignore lest he suffer from profiling. Since it was his own father that turned him in, they myst have been protecting the poor boy from parental profiling.
The number of blatant warning signs noticed from Hasan over a period of YEARS, ignored due to the military policy of PC has been toroughly documented.
BOTH of these cases could have been prevented. The information was there. It was just deemed more expedient to ignore it. Sure, al Qaeda types will try more small, high profile attacks, but if we just concentrate on what we KNOW, rather than creating MORE miltibillion dollar levels of Government wasteland, we stand a much better chance of catching the bad guys.
I keep looking for something like this to happen at a major Christian holiday, in an enclosed space, so the body count is really racked up. Their best scenario would be in a state that limits or prohibits concealed carry, which by definition makes the shooter safer, as well as being a less gun friendly environment. The ball for gun control would start rolling more easily in a state like that.
Keep some bacon in your pocket in case you’re the one who guns him down. Make sure the newspapers take a picture of him with a big slab of unclean meat in his mouth.
Until the PC police deem it not nice and demand everyone give up pork.
Bump.
I carry a packet of real bacon bits whenever I fly.
What frightens me is another Breslin right here in America... It would be so easy for a small group of terrorist to pull it off.. Schools are gun free zones.. It really scares me..
A Day Care Center would be more vulnerable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.