These Dems are pure evil.
The Chicago Way.
Lord, deliver us from the evil that is in Washington.
I’d be happy if they passed it this way! It would be totally illegal and could easily be negated!
This is Honduras. But we have guns. A lot of them.
I was trying to explain to family in Australia about guns in the US. The LAST thing they thought was that their purpose is to protect us from the government.
This is getting uglier and uglier.
All of this was well-covered in “Ideocracy”.
This is not going to happen, no way no how.
Be in DC with us on 4/15 and seriously disrupt the city.
Civil disobedience. I have come to the conclusion that is the *minimum* that will get their attention.
Are you reading this Janet??
If they dont have to follow what the law says, Niether do I.
I know the Chicago way. Lots and lots of bullets!
No. Never have. We've known that all along.
“And unlike other Unconstitutional things Congress does, there’s caselaw here suggesting pretty clearly that when Congress attempts to pass a law in the absence of proper bicameralism and presentment, a person negatively affected by Congress’s action (e.g., a person required to pay a fine for not having health insurance) has standing to challenge the law’s validity in the Courts. This farce is illegal and unconstitutional on its face, and someone has to be advising the Democrats in the House of this fact. They already know the American people don’t want this bill. They know by now that what they’re trying to do is illegal. The question now is whether they still have the shame to care about either.”
That’s from the article.
[I know it looks a little long, but the Declaration contains statements which are not often brought to our attention.]
"That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. ... The history of the present King of Great Britain [George III] is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world. ... He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance. ... He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation: ... For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent: ... For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences: ... For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments: ... For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever. ... He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us."
--- Fortunately, all WE have to do is vote in November.
What is the contemporary version of Torches and Pitchforks?????
The day this happens, our nation becomes a tyranny.
It's obvious that both questions must be answered in the negative.
They don't care about the opinions of The People, nor about legality, especially Constitutional legality. Concern for legality is for the "little people".
I do not want Obama IMPEACHED... I want him IMPRISONED.
It's an exercise in faux constitutionality, and if it flies he can ignore the constitution entirely. How long will it take before Obama decides he doesn't need the political cover of a legislative body at all? Or for that matter, a SCOTUS?
I've been thinking of awful scenarios in which the SCOTUS declares a law unconstitutional and Obama, with the blessing of a Dem Congress, simply implements the law regardless of the Supreme's ruling. What happens then? The SCOTUS has no troops. Implementing court decisions is the burden of law enforcement, but what if they simply refuse?