1 posted on
03/08/2010 7:17:38 PM PST by
Man50D
To: Man50D
From all I have read on this subject, it would appear that NO ONE in America has any standing to question if their political candidates are “Elegible” or not.
2 posted on
03/08/2010 7:20:30 PM PST by
Cheerio
(Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: Man50D
This will be an issue in 2012, when several states, through their own, enacted laws, require more documentation.
They WILL have standing.
3 posted on
03/08/2010 7:21:03 PM PST by
Kansas58
To: Man50D
Sounds like an “everyone has standing” argument, not a “no standing” argument.
4 posted on
03/08/2010 7:21:05 PM PST by
coloradan
(The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
To: Man50D
How dare we question the credentials of Chairman Zero.
5 posted on
03/08/2010 7:21:41 PM PST by
SpaceBar
To: Man50D
Save millions in legal fees - just show the Kenyan birth certificate!
6 posted on
03/08/2010 7:22:38 PM PST by
Iron Munro
("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you." - Steinbeck)
To: Man50D
Problem solved:
11 posted on
03/08/2010 7:35:56 PM PST by
freedumb2003
( Tagline lost -- anyone seen it?)
To: Man50D
I think I’ll not pay income tax, as I have “no Standing”, since it affects all people, too.....
12 posted on
03/08/2010 7:36:15 PM PST by
traditional1
("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
To: Man50D
...any injury to someone whose president is not eligible is the same injury for all people, so the individual has no legal standing to complain. So if a terrorist concocts a virus and spreads it throughout the US, no one could sue because all would be equally at risk (injured)?
I know legal arguments sometimes defy logic, but this one...
13 posted on
03/08/2010 7:36:51 PM PST by
ZOOKER
( Exploring the fine line between cynicism and outright depression)
To: Man50D
...the government's statement will be answered by the scheduled deadline of March 22. My calendar is marked. See tagline.
17 posted on
03/08/2010 7:44:17 PM PST by
circumbendibus
(Obama is an unconstitutional illegal putative president. Quo Warranto in 2010)
To: Man50D
The courts have been wrong so far. We have the right to an honest election. The secretaries of state, congress, and the electoral college did not perform their ministerial duties. We have standing to know about the candidates, especially the one who was elected.
21 posted on
03/08/2010 7:53:39 PM PST by
votemout
To: Man50D
It would seem to me that any one on the left who agrees with the direction the anointed one is pushing the country would be proof that anyone on opposition should have standing from the ‘injury’ perspective. Clearly, someone who encourages the further spread of this vermin’s socialist pogroms would NOT consider themselves ‘injured’ by the changes they seek. That would be sufficient to lay to waste the argument that an injury to one is an injury to all...
Of course, then there is legitimate logic that would tend to support the notion that anyone who voted in the election, or anyone who ran for the office of President, should have standing, as an active participant in the process.
It’s still time to take back the country.
22 posted on
03/08/2010 8:05:45 PM PST by
PubliusMM
(RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
To: Man50D
The attorneys argued in a brief submitted to the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals that any injury to someone whose president is not eligible is the same injury for all people, so the individual has no legal standing to complain.If the law supposes that, then the law is an ass.
To: Man50D
To: Man50D
The attorneys argued in a brief submitted to the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals that any injury to someone whose president is not eligible is the same injury for all people, so the individual has no legal standing to complain. I guess the founders screwed up and left out the Judiciary when the they tried to protect the right of the people "to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Course there was something, even before the 1st amendment was written about The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution
But the judiciary has, by use of "precedent" piled on "precedent" converted "all" to "some".
27 posted on
03/08/2010 11:11:32 PM PST by
El Gato
("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
To: Man50D
No legislative body thus far has seen fit to establish any process or assign any responsibilities to any gov't office to enforce Art. II Sect. 1 of the Constitution.
Under the 10th Amendment don't the people reserve the power to enforce those provisions?
I need whole drawer full of these:
30 posted on
03/09/2010 5:07:36 AM PST by
TexasVoter
(No Constituion - No Union!)
To: Man50D
I would like someone out there to explain how someone can get standing to sue in Federal Court to have a cross removed from a lone hill in the Mojave Desert according to these rules. These alleged rules of standing are bent and twisted and broken all the time.
31 posted on
03/09/2010 6:25:57 AM PST by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
To: Man50D
The attorneys argued in a brief submitted to the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals that any injury to someone whose president is not eligible is the same injury for all people, so the individual has no legal standing to complain.The same can be said for someone who embezzles funds from the governmment of all the people. So the individual has no legal standing to complain about that either????
32 posted on
03/09/2010 6:35:45 AM PST by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
To: Man50D
The case contends the framers of the U.S. Constitution, when they adopted the requirement that a president be a "natural born citizen," excluded dual citizens. Correction: they excluded people born as dual citizens, even if they renounced one later.
42 posted on
03/09/2010 8:36:13 PM PST by
Dajjal
(Obama is an Ericksonian NLP hypnotist.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson