Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin's secret "laugh track" machine at Jay Leno show: makes Adam Lambert fans like her, too!
New Palin scandal: Leno might have piped in some laughter for her jokes ^ | March 6, 2010 | RonDog (and FRiends)

Posted on 03/06/2010 4:49:52 AM PST by RonDog

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-292 next last
To: FreeReign
Obama's problems are because of his ideology and not because he is "unseasoned".

We can be grateful that he is unseasoned; otherwise, his presidency would be even more lethal than it is. Like the disfunctional Kennedy clan, his ideology was hidden behind his media-friendly looks and a dumbed-down public easily manipulated by media imagery.

161 posted on 03/06/2010 10:46:59 AM PST by Albion Wilde (Liberals love the poor so much they came up w/ a plan to create millions more of them. - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine

But you don’t really know unless he dresses like Liza’s husband!


162 posted on 03/06/2010 11:06:18 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
Here's an interesting recent comment from a (relatively) sane poster on the original Daily Kos diary, and a reply by one of the Kos Kids Ko-konspirators that the mighty WaPo is hot on this trail:

 Excuse me (0+ / 0-)

I never said anyone was lying.  I suggested that the diarist's memories may be inaccurate and he may not have had a complete picture of what was going on around him.  This happens to even the best-trained observers (and I have no reason to believe that the diarist is such).

No doubt, if you were listening for it, you might have heard groans, boos, sarcastic laughter, moments of silence -- and that might impress you as the most salient features of the soundscape.

But that doesn't mean they actually were.

Personal impressions, particularly when skewed by a strong emotional bias, are not a match for good old data.

Now, it seems to me quite possible and even likely that they mixed the sound so as to mute any boos or catcalls, and enhance any applause.  That's credible and to some extent even defensible, from a commercial point of view -- I'm sure Leno doesn't want to add fuel to the impression that he and his show are deeply unpopular.

But the diarist is claiming that they went beyond that -- that they ripped out all the audience tracks and replaced them with canned laughter.  And while that's certainly not unprecedented, or technologically unfeasible, it's a rather serious charge and I would want more evidence from it than a series of impressions.  Did anybody ask the studio? Interview the sound technicians?  Get any kind of statement at all?

In the absence of an effort to verify these impressions, such claims could backfire, if it turns out that the aired audio is in fact based on the studio tapes.

P.S.: As I've said before, I am in no way or sense "pro-Sarah".  You need to take care of that knee-jerk reflex before you injure yourself with it.


  •  Yes, the studio has been asked (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    tommyfocus2003

    Washington Post interviewed us both, plus more experts on audio. Watch for the story!

    You bring up reasonable points, but I echo what Symbolman said - I was there - and I distinctly remember wondering why the Palin supporters weren't laughing at her jokes at certain places. She was uncomfortable, and I think the audience picked up on that and was nervous and uncomfortable, too.


163 posted on 03/06/2010 11:20:55 AM PST by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Dang I saw Palin on the tonight show, but I missed her on dancing with the stars!


164 posted on 03/06/2010 11:24:31 AM PST by Syncro (TPXIII coming soon! March 27th to April 15th 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
Carl Cameron hates Palin

He has toned down his dislike for her lately, but it still seethes in his soul.

165 posted on 03/06/2010 11:26:05 AM PST by Syncro (TPXIII coming soon! March 27th to April 15th 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Clyde5445
If and its a big if Sarah doesn’t run then her support will dry up faster than a rain storm in the desert. All the people who go and see Sarah support her ideals but there is a tacit assumption Sarah will run in ‘12.

We have a lot invested in Sarah and with that comes obligations and that is for Sarah to Run for the presidency.

If Sarah doesn’t run then they win and we lose but conversely I like it the other way around better WE WIN THEY LOSE

IMO it doesn't matter if Palin runs for President or not.

I don't see where she has ever obligated herself to do so.

She will not lose her support base, and will continue to be strong Conservative force here in our Constitutional Republic.

166 posted on 03/06/2010 11:34:22 AM PST by Syncro (TPXIII coming soon! March 27th to April 15th 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

You bet your sweet bippy! Look that up in your Funk and Wagnalls!


167 posted on 03/06/2010 11:50:10 AM PST by POWERSBOOTHEFAN (Blessed Be The Name Of The Lord,For His Name Alone Is Exaulted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RonDog

I didn’t have time to view it earlier and wanted to come back to it.


168 posted on 03/06/2010 11:56:05 AM PST by WinOne4TheGipper (Truthers to the Left of me, Birthers (pretending to be) to the Right of me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
Great job on the Leno show RonDog!

And great After Action Report.

Nice to see you sorting out all of the flotsam and jetsam in the media and on the www.

169 posted on 03/06/2010 11:58:41 AM PST by Syncro (TPXIII coming soon! March 27th to April 15th 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

That was very, very, well said.


170 posted on 03/06/2010 12:02:48 PM PST by papasmurf (sudo apt-get install U-S-Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RonDog

We now know ten times more about Palin’s show business career than we know about Obama’s qualifications to be POTUS.


171 posted on 03/06/2010 12:08:08 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government -- Thomas Payne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

Better check the responses to your post or next week you’re going to be REALLY late for work or miss a lot of your shows on TV ... ;-)


172 posted on 03/06/2010 12:08:33 PM PST by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #173 Removed by Moderator

To: BuckyKat

Yep!!


174 posted on 03/06/2010 12:16:34 PM PST by CyberAnt (HEALTHCARE IS NOT A "RIGHT"!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: gardencatz

Do you remember Reagan? He was very serious about his conservatism but funny and lighthearted.
- - - - - -
Do we remember Bonzo? After he had acted opposite a chimp, he couldn’t possibly be a serious man. And I don’t remember Reagan having a 2 million copy bestseller under his belt before running for president.


175 posted on 03/06/2010 12:17:59 PM PST by excopconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: RonDog; lonevoice

Yep, count me in as a huge Sarah Palin and Adam Lambert fan. I am both politically and socially conservative, but I can appreciate the phenomenal vocals given to Lambert as a gift from God. It may surprise many of you to know that a huge percentage of Adam’s fans are women over 40.


176 posted on 03/06/2010 12:22:24 PM PST by Pride in the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

What bad decisions ?

she is trying to be mainstream


177 posted on 03/06/2010 12:42:51 PM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative (Destroy the RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio
This is breaking news?
It was for a while EARLY this morning, and then was not -- later.

And now, apparently, now it is -- again!

Thank you, "second shift" Mods!

178 posted on 03/06/2010 12:47:12 PM PST by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: alicewonders

What makes you think she is not serious ? Have you read her Facebook posts, her OP Eds. her speeches ?

she is doing all of that and she is building credibility. I think she is trying to be mainstream and break free from the Evangelical, tight as a drum, stuck back in the 1800s stereotype. shes trying to show people that she is modern


179 posted on 03/06/2010 12:48:41 PM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative (Destroy the RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

See post #96......It’s not just me.....Other diehard Palin supporters feel the same way......NEVER did I mention that she should be expected to be mistake free......


180 posted on 03/06/2010 12:55:42 PM PST by 3722535r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-292 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson