Posted on 03/03/2010 7:00:34 PM PST by Man50D
John Holdren, President Obama's "science czar," served on the board of editors of a magazine whose personnel were accused of providing vital nuclear information that helped the Soviet Union build an atom bomb.
The magazine, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, has a long history of employing socialist and communist sympathizers, including during the time of Holdren's employment in 1984, reports the New Zeal blog.
Holdren is assistant to the president for science and technology, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, and co-chairman of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.
The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists began publishing regularly in 1945, when it was founded by former physicists from the Manhattan Project, which developed the first atomic bomb.
Two of the magazine's founding sponsors, Leo Szilard and Robert Oppenheimer, were accused of passing information from the Manhattan Project to the Soviets. Both were also key initiators of the Manhattan Project.
In 1994, Pavel Sudoplatov, a former major-general in Soviet intelligence, named Szilard and Oppenheimer as key sources of crucial atomic information to the Soviet Union.
"The most vital information for developing the first Soviet atomic bomb came from scientists engaged in the Manhattan Project to build the American atomic bomb Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi and Leo Szilard," wrote Sudoplatov.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Yet another good find on this scumbag’s commie connections. Thanks!
What a dirtbag that was elected! I guess dirt bag is two words Barak obamuuse
Here is your “Hope and Change” folks - enjoy your lack of freedom.
Communists are everywhere in Washington D.C. now. I don’t know why they spent so much time and money with their “cold war.” All they had to do was form a group of “community organizers”, select a minority presidential candidate with a huge race card and then promise the freeloaders “free healthcare”. The Reds could have taken over America 60 years ago.
Still, I think Holdren's time is up. Obama has some better, newer friends he needs to payoff while he still can.
So, Holdren, lissen up boy ~ it's BUS TIME!
save
'shocking' Usually means: 'unexpected' or 'out of character' or 'outrageous' or 'heinous' or 'extremely vile' or 'evil action' or ...
0bamarx & comunists, not 'shocking' more like anticipated!
The Reds could have taken over America 60 years ago.
They did.
You’re right.
Is it time to March yet?
Is it time to get this giant on its feet and start impeaching the people in our government, WHOSE SALARIES WE PAY with OUR MONEY who DO NOT BELIEVE IN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC?
Do we need to start a campaign to call out, individually, the reporters in the main stream press and the corporate owners of the mainstream TV stations for their failure to REPORT on the horrific and overwhelming number of people uhbama has working in our White House who HATE OUR SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT and have been in organizations determined to undermine our Democratic Republic?
When are we going to move?
I don't think we can wait until the elections.
Agreed.
How is this “shocking” when Beck reported on this ... last year?
Did anyone at all expect anything different?
It does seem as if they are upping the ante almost on a daily basis. More "in your face" with what's being said and done. Damn, I wish the Founders were alive. Would love to hear their comments. My gut tells me they would be Very Concerned about all that is happening. I know I mention a lot, "there's something every day", but it sure seems like it. We need to get more organized, have a plan. . . sometimes November 2 seems a long way away. .
I still wonder what would happen if 200 million people just drove to Washington D.C.? . .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.