Skip to comments.
Tap water contaminant 'castrates' frogs
abc ^
| 3/2/10
| Liz Szabo
Posted on 03/02/2010 9:28:28 AM PST by Nachum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
1
posted on
03/02/2010 9:28:28 AM PST
by
Nachum
To: Nachum
2
posted on
03/02/2010 9:29:38 AM PST
by
OCCASparky
(Obama--Playing a West Wing fantasy in a '24' world.)
To: Nachum
that explains Arlen Specter.
3
posted on
03/02/2010 9:29:42 AM PST
by
WOBBLY BOB
(ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
To: Nachum
4
posted on
03/02/2010 9:29:55 AM PST
by
smokingfrog
(You can't ignore your boss and expect to keep your job... WWW.filipthishouse2010.com)
To: Nachum
So when the Princess finally kisses me I won’t be up to requiting her affections?
5
posted on
03/02/2010 9:32:03 AM PST
by
Mr Ramsbotham
("Did I give you carbolic acid? I'd love to.")
To: Nachum
“Mr Pres__ent, may I get you a glass of water?”
6
posted on
03/02/2010 9:32:56 AM PST
by
theDentist
(fybo; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
To: Nachum
That explains metrosexuals.
7
posted on
03/02/2010 9:35:10 AM PST
by
Dewey Revoltnow
(Worst. Community. Organizer. Ever!)
To: Nachum
How exactly does a chemical cause a male to produce eggs? I smell a crock.
8
posted on
03/02/2010 9:36:44 AM PST
by
ReneeLynn
(Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
To: theDentist
"Mr Pres__ent, may I get you a glass of water?"
Michelle got their first, you're too late. :)
9
posted on
03/02/2010 9:37:01 AM PST
by
pyx
(Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
To: Nachum
Apparently, this water has made its way to San Francisco, NYC, Los Angeles and, of course, Washington, D.C.
To: Nachum
From the article, “Although scientists still have many questions about atrazine, Sass says, the chemical should be phased out as a precaution.”
Sass, actually Jennifer Sass, is an ass. What this pseudo-scientist is attempting to do is apply what the enviro-commies call “the precautionary principle”.
What is that? It says that whenever there is any activity or thing an enviro thinks might be a risk, that as a precaution, that activity or thing must be outlawed.
Think of it as an insurance policy that costs all of America’s potential productivity. Worse yet, it is what underwriters call a “zero risk policy” in that since the precautionary principle is essentially unprovable, there can be no liability.
After all, “we did it for the chilrun”.
11
posted on
03/02/2010 9:40:49 AM PST
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
To: Nachum
Great, and just when I’m feeling froggy.
12
posted on
03/02/2010 9:40:55 AM PST
by
dblshot
(Insanity - electing the same people over and over and expecting different results.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
13
posted on
03/02/2010 9:43:09 AM PST
by
hoosiermama
(ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
To: smokingfrog
smokingfrog, do you recall what Clemenceau once said about war?
He said war was too important to be left to the generals. When he said that, 50 years ago, he might have been right. But today, war is too important to be left to politicians. They have neither the time, the training, nor the inclination for strategic thought. I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.
So drink pure, fresh spring water. We need you to scream when the commie water you’re sitting in starts to boil, and you won’t be able to do that without your gonads.
To: ReneeLynn
I believe the chemicals are part of a group labeled “oestrogens”. They mimic estrogen in the body.
15
posted on
03/02/2010 9:45:22 AM PST
by
Spudx7
To: OCCASparky
This my dear FRiend is why God invented Beer, Wine and Whiskey. Mankind is meant to expand and prosper, expansion is guaranteed by the above liquids.
16
posted on
03/02/2010 9:47:23 AM PST
by
Little Bill
(Carol Che-Porter is a MOONBAT.)
To: Nachum
17
posted on
03/02/2010 9:47:53 AM PST
by
Ulysse
(a)
To: Spudx7
But that can’t create eggs. You’re born with the eggs you have. I mean women of course. You can shoot a tranny full of estrogen and there won’t be egg production because the organs aren’t there from the start which contain the eggs.
Maybe it’s different for frogs?
18
posted on
03/02/2010 9:49:27 AM PST
by
ReneeLynn
(Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
To: Nachum
Will this work on the cane frog problem in Australia?
19
posted on
03/02/2010 9:56:20 AM PST
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
((B.?) Hussein (Obama?Soetoro?Dunham?) Change America Will Die From.)
To: Nachum
...to produce gender-bending effects in male frogs, "chemically castrating" some and turning others into females, a study shows. Ergo, there should be more frogs, since there would be more eggs..............
20
posted on
03/02/2010 10:00:50 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Education makes people easy to lead, difficult to drive; easy to govern, but impossible to enslave.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson