Skip to comments.
France defends talks on sale of warships to Russia
Times Online ^
| 3/1/2010
| Charles Bremner
Posted on 03/01/2010 7:58:25 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
The scene is set for conflict between France and its Nato allies when President Medvedev of Russia arrives in Paris today intent on ordering up to four powerful warships from French shipbuilders.
Washington and the former Soviet bloc members of Nato are alarmed by President Sarkozys willingness to sell a 600ft Mistral Class amphibious assault ship, and possibly three more, to the Russian Navy.
Georgia, which was subjected to a Russian invasion in 2008, is leading the charge to stop Moscow acquiring Mistrals, which sell for about £400 million each.
Admiral Vladimir Vysotsky, the chief of the Russian Navy, has described the helicopter and troop-carrying vessel as an ideal asset for Black Sea operations in the Caucasus.
No Nato nation has sold military hardware on nearly such a scale to Russia. France is arguing that the Mistral is little more than a freight vessel and that Moscow must be drawn into a partnership. We cannot on one hand claim to be partners with the new Russia and, on the other hand, treat it like it was the old Soviet Union, Hervé Morin, the Defence Minister, said.
The contract, which has been approved in principle by President Sarkozy, could create 2,000 jobs.
Russian officials said that no final decision had been taken on the order, but Mr Medvedev indicated in a French media interview last week that he hoped to clinch the warship contract on his Paris visit this week.
(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aircraftcarrier; france; medvedev; mistral; mistralclass; nato; russia; russiannavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Cincinna
2
posted on
03/01/2010 8:04:03 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: sonofstrangelove
I have just one thing to say, “Charles De Gaulle.”
3
posted on
03/01/2010 8:07:25 PM PST
by
Dr.Zoidberg
(Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
To: sonofstrangelove
Why can’t Russia build their own ships? Do they have no unemployed??
pics?
4
posted on
03/01/2010 8:07:46 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Political Philosophy: I Own Me (yep, boiled down to 6 letters))
To: GeronL
Maybe they intend to make a copy from the original. A little reverse-engineering.
5
posted on
03/01/2010 8:11:59 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
Maybe, how many are they buying?
6
posted on
03/01/2010 8:13:26 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Political Philosophy: I Own Me (yep, boiled down to 6 letters))
To: GeronL
The Russians want three more.
7
posted on
03/01/2010 8:15:05 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
I don’t know about anyone else, but this doesn’t really bother me. It just gives us more leeway to do whatever we want.
8
posted on
03/01/2010 8:15:14 PM PST
by
RC one
(WHAT!!!!)
To: sonofstrangelove
9
posted on
03/01/2010 8:16:07 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Political Philosophy: I Own Me (yep, boiled down to 6 letters))
To: RC one
No NATO nation has ever sold any hardware to the Russians. This is a gross violation of the treaty.
10
posted on
03/01/2010 8:16:39 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
Big boat. Doesn't look like stealth is a priority.
11
posted on
03/01/2010 8:16:59 PM PST
by
katana
(Interesting Times)
To: RC one
Who cares? It’s not like building an aircraft carrier for the RUssians!
To: sonofstrangelove
We cannot on one hand claim to be partners with the new Russia and, on the other hand, treat it like it was the old Soviet Union, Neither can the new Russia claim to be a partner with us when it acts like the old Soviet Union.

13
posted on
03/01/2010 8:18:53 PM PST
by
americanophile
(Congratulations Team USA! You made us proud!)
To: katana
Mistral class ships can accommodate up to 450 soldiers, although this can be doubled for short-term deployments. The 28,500 sq ft vehicle hangar can carry a 40-strong Leclerc tank battalion
14
posted on
03/01/2010 8:19:06 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
To: americanophile
15
posted on
03/01/2010 8:20:34 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
16
posted on
03/01/2010 8:20:56 PM PST
by
americanophile
(Congratulations Team USA! You made us proud!)
To: GeronL
or maybe the Republic of Georgia is the target
17
posted on
03/01/2010 8:21:56 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Political Philosophy: I Own Me (yep, boiled down to 6 letters))
To: GeronL
18
posted on
03/01/2010 8:29:41 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
The 28,500 sq ft vehicle hangar can carry a 40-strong Leclerc tank battalion Everything I ever needed to know about the Leclerc I learned here. ;-)
(Scroll down to the words "Original Blogspot Posting"...)
Cheers!
19
posted on
03/01/2010 8:31:24 PM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: grey_whiskers
20
posted on
03/01/2010 8:33:07 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Wernher Von Braun)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson