Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Secret Service Computers Only Work at 60 Percent Capacity; Agency Uses 1980s Mainframe
ABC News ^ | February 26, 2010 | Jason Ryan

Posted on 02/26/2010 6:57:29 AM PST by C19fan

A classified review of the United States Secret Service's computer technology found that the agency's computers were fully operational only 60 percent of the time because of outdated systems and a reliance on a computer mainframe that dates to the 1980s, according to Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: classified; mainframes; secretservice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
I just posted this because I know there is a good number of older mainframe experts here.
1 posted on 02/26/2010 6:57:29 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan

No money in the budget? Jeez.


2 posted on 02/26/2010 6:58:08 AM PST by Galtoid ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Galtoid

Obviously, Secret Service agents don’t have time to find the enemies within.


3 posted on 02/26/2010 6:59:23 AM PST by ExTexasRedhead (Clean the RAT/RINO Sewer in 2010 and 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
I believe the Air Traffic Controller system is also ancient and fragile.

If you wanted to stimulate the economy, and really felt compelled to spend $1T and really thought that putting people on the government payroll was desirable -- there really are useful things that could be done. Upgrade computer systems, build the Wall on our southern border, etc.

Or you could spend $1T buying votes.

4 posted on 02/26/2010 7:00:28 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (We're all heading toward red revolution - we just disagree on which type of Red we want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

5 posted on 02/26/2010 7:01:46 AM PST by smokingfrog (You can't ignore your boss and expect to keep your job... WWW.filipthishouse2010.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Odds are that your bank is also using a 1980’s mainframe. There are millions of them still in use, and absolutely nothing wrong with them. It would simply cost too much to migrate all of that data with little benefit.


6 posted on 02/26/2010 7:02:08 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

They’re using an old IBM 370 or Amdahl V7/V8? That’s some seriously aged iron.


7 posted on 02/26/2010 7:02:25 AM PST by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

This means they are receiving daily guidance (and lengthy, multi-page error messages) from CPF, if it’s an old IBM frame.


8 posted on 02/26/2010 7:03:13 AM PST by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Then bring back Able Danger. Fix it right away.


9 posted on 02/26/2010 7:03:48 AM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
Government health care will employ the same cutting edge technology LOL.
10 posted on 02/26/2010 7:05:44 AM PST by crosslink (Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

There are plenty of mainframes still in use but most have been updated or upgraded to newer models, at least newer than the 80s. Fine for Commerce or Education to run on these types of systems but not a security or defense operation. Hanging on to legacy systems can be problematic and for the Secret Service not to be at least reasonably up to date is not good for security.


11 posted on 02/26/2010 7:06:55 AM PST by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

“Sources tell ABC News that the Secret Service was so plagued by computer problems that the agency invited the National Security Agency to formally review its information technology systems. The Secret Service’s databases are outdated and users are at times unable to conduct searches from one system to another....”

“...Asked about the review and the NSA review of Secret Service systems, service spokesman Malcolm Wiley said, “At our request, NSA performed an independent evaluation of our existing IT network to determine if any deficiencies or potential vulnerabilities existed. ...Results of the review suggested we needed enhancements to ensure that our systems remained sound. A number of the recommended changes have already been implemented.

“According to officials at the time of the review, the unofficial cost estimate to update the system was $187 million. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which oversees the Secret Service, has so far allocated $69 million, including $36 million in the department’s most recent budget request.”


12 posted on 02/26/2010 7:07:04 AM PST by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Can't possibly upgrade since it would take away from the outright theft our fantastic leaders are taking. Pelosi’s flights home, King Obama’s vacation trips around the world and across the nation, etc, etc. WTF. Upgrade?
13 posted on 02/26/2010 7:08:23 AM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

PDP-11?.................


14 posted on 02/26/2010 7:09:07 AM PST by Red Badger (Education makes people easy to lead, difficult to drive; easy to govern, but impossible to enslave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJS1950

We were pretty impressed when we went from our System 34 and System 36’s to a system 38.


15 posted on 02/26/2010 7:09:19 AM PST by listenhillary (the only reason government wants to be our provider is so it may become our master)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

dont forget to whizzywig to print.........LOL


16 posted on 02/26/2010 7:09:43 AM PST by Michigan Bowhunter (Democrat socialist liberal scumbags.....how did we let this happen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Do it an put some computer geeks to work. It would be better than wasting a bunch of money on a “jobs bill.”


17 posted on 02/26/2010 7:11:30 AM PST by smokingfrog (You can't ignore your boss and expect to keep your job... WWW.filipthishouse2010.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I can see why they work only 60% of the time, a 1980’s mainframe would probably have trouble not only keeping up with the amount of data that can be sent easily now, but I question the ability to communicate with more current systems.

No computer expert, but honestly, they have no money to upgrade?


18 posted on 02/26/2010 7:13:54 AM PST by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

I remember a number of stories of our government spending ten times as much as necessary to upgrade their systems. By the time they got close to finishing, no one was happy with what they had and it was seriously out of date if they ever got the new system up and running at all.

IRS computers might be what I am thinking about.


19 posted on 02/26/2010 7:17:58 AM PST by listenhillary (the only reason government wants to be our provider is so it may become our master)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Odds are that your bank is also using a 1980’s mainframe. There are millions of them still in use, and absolutely nothing wrong with them. It would simply cost too much to migrate all of that data with little benefit.

True but a 68 percent performance reliability is not acceptable.
20 posted on 02/26/2010 7:20:26 AM PST by TSgt (RE-ELECT NOBODY - VOTE THEM ALL OUT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson