Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whale that killed its trainer won't be isolated
Associated Press ^ | Feb. 25, 2010 | MIKE SCHNEIDER

Posted on 02/25/2010 11:26:14 AM PST by Free ThinkerNY

ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) - Trainers will continue to work with a killer whale that grabbed one of their colleagues and dragged her underwater, killing her, but SeaWorld said Thursday it is reviewing its procedures.

People lined up to get into the Orlando park a day after the whale named Tilikum killed veteran trainer Dawn Brancheau as a horrified audience watched.

Tilikum had been involved in two previous deaths, including a Canadian trainer dragged under water by him and two others whales in 1991.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: killerwhale; orlando; seaworld; tilikum; whale
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: Liberty1970
"Just because most dogs are man's best friend doesn't mean you give a pit bull pardon after pardon after it attacks and kills someone."

Domesticated dogs aren't expected to kill people. This Killer whale, OTOH, was simply exhibiting his instinctual behavior. The trainer clearly was cognizant of the dangers of her profession and assumed the liability in choosing to work with wild and potentially dangerous animals.

The whale can't be held culpable for acting like a killer whale.

41 posted on 02/25/2010 11:56:49 AM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: bvw

These trainers know and accept the risks of working with killer whales.


42 posted on 02/25/2010 12:00:14 PM PST by Tatze (I reject your reality and substitute my own!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I’m sorry for the trainer, just free it...it dosen’t belong there anyway....


43 posted on 02/25/2010 12:00:25 PM PST by geege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Lord, you want to use logic in America today.


44 posted on 02/25/2010 12:01:18 PM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Does anyone know where to view any of the videos taken?


45 posted on 02/25/2010 12:02:11 PM PST by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt

Do Orcas fear man? The only other option, for safety’s sake, is euthanasia. What insurance company in their right mind would insure those who work with this particular animal?


46 posted on 02/25/2010 12:05:02 PM PST by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

It’s a KILLER Whale for God’s sake. He doesn’t KNOW he supposed to be a water logged Lassie!


47 posted on 02/25/2010 12:05:08 PM PST by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Or a rug doctor.


48 posted on 02/25/2010 12:05:23 PM PST by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

” So they obviously knew it was a problem animal.”

Not really a problem animal - it’s a great big wild carnivorous sea mammal, not a freaking pet. I’m surprised this sort of thing does not happen more often, actually.


49 posted on 02/25/2010 12:08:18 PM PST by -YYZ- (Strong like bull, smart like ox.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bvw
There should be manslaughter charges against SeaWorld.

Are you jesting or are you serious. People who work with dangerous animals know that there are risks associated with the job. They do it anyhow. They are willing to take the risks because they love the job. It doesn't matter whether it's a Tiger, Polar Bear, or Killer Whale. It's a risk that the people who work with animals are willing to take.

Ask any animal trainer and they will tell you this. For SeaWorld to be responsible for this woman's death is beyond stupid. They should be completely free of ANY liability. This woman knew the dangers of her job and she accepted those dangers. If you are serious then your attitude is a huge part of the problem we face today in an unregulated and overly litigious society. If serious, you are a big part of the problem. Think about it.
50 posted on 02/25/2010 12:12:17 PM PST by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
The whale can't be held culpable for acting like a killer whale.

Then why not yawn and let things go when a bear acts like a bear and kills someone? It is still prudent to save the life of the next victim when we have a known problem animal.

Are there any other fatalities associated with any of the other 50+ killer whales in captivity? If not, then I suggest it is prudent to put this one out of harm's way, one way or the other. It is the outlier, and the reasons why are a secondary concern.

51 posted on 02/25/2010 12:12:28 PM PST by Liberty1970 (http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/lydiablievernicht)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: truthguy
Unregulated S/B over regulated. I got so mad at the poster I was replying to that I didn't proofread.
52 posted on 02/25/2010 12:16:14 PM PST by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1970
"Then why not yawn and let things go when a bear acts like a bear and kills someone?"

Presumably because the bear has free reign to roam wherever he chooses, and as such poses continued risk to the public. The whale certainly cannot swim from home to home, terrorizing children at play.

The only person (people) or animal with any culpability here is the trainer and the management staff of Sea World. If the animal is so unpredictable, that it needs to be isolated, then so be it. But, that's not license to kill it out of pure convenience. Either return it to the wild, or continue to care for it, as is the park's assumed responsibility when it placed it (or it's parents) into captivity.

53 posted on 02/25/2010 12:17:58 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Liberty1970

Please read my comments @50. They apply to you as well. I think it’s ironic that you choose the word Liberty as part of your tag. Think about it.


54 posted on 02/25/2010 12:18:57 PM PST by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Even Great White Sharks fear the Killer Whale. Why would anyone be at all surprised when a KILLER whale does what comes naturally?


55 posted on 02/25/2010 12:20:14 PM PST by Reaganesque ("And thou shalt do it with all humility, trusting in me, reviling not against revilers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

LOLOL.......oh, I have heard lots of bad jokes about Cleveland but your comment is the funniest.


56 posted on 02/25/2010 12:21:09 PM PST by Carley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9

Watch what orcas do!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42mg0FnRicA


57 posted on 02/25/2010 12:21:23 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
IIRC, there are no reports of an Orca attacking man in the wild.
Yet, this whale has a history while in captivity.
58 posted on 02/25/2010 12:26:45 PM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
The only person (people) or animal with any culpability here is the trainer and the management staff of Sea World. If the animal is so unpredictable, that it needs to be isolated, then so be it. But, that's not license to kill it out of pure convenience.

You consider saving human lives a matter of 'pure convenience'?

You do understand that one of the three dead was not a trainer or on the staff, correct? I had initially made the same point you did in my 'mitigate' comment in my first post, before realizing my mistake of saying only trainers are at risk. While not condoning trespassing in the least, it's clear that trainers are not the only ones at risk if they are not the only ones who have already died.

I believe in liberty - that is, freedom to act in within a moral context. That applies solely to humans who operate within a moral framework. It does not extend to animals in either sense. That is, I don't blame the animal for 'murder' in a human sense, but neither to I say the animal is blameless and that it should be allowed to kill again. The dead victim's liberty has been dramatically curtailed, and that is what matters.

59 posted on 02/25/2010 12:28:50 PM PST by Liberty1970 (http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/lydiablievernicht)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: truthguy

Cf. post #59.


60 posted on 02/25/2010 12:30:28 PM PST by Liberty1970 (http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/lydiablievernicht)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson