Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: calex59
The wife did nothing to be sued for. This is totally out of line.

She is the legal executer of the estate. Legally, her name has to be on the suit.

320 posted on 02/24/2010 8:52:50 PM PST by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: ColdWater
I don't really care if she is the legal executor or not, she is still being sued. In fact, the whole idea of suing this estate is repugnant. This widow is after money and she doesn't care who she hurts in order to obtain it. The wife of the perp is not responsible and neither is the estate.If you could bring back the a**hat who flew the plane into the building and sue his a**, fine. Otherwise this is simply BS.

The wife of the nutjob is just as big a victim as the widow of the innocent bystander, who should she sue? She has no recourse except to collect what insurance she can, if indeed she has insurance. She no longer even has a house to live it if the reports are correct.

IMO, this law suit is not justified and is a despicable act.

335 posted on 02/24/2010 9:05:06 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]

To: ColdWater
She is the legal executer of the estate. Legally, her name has to be on the suit. "

She's not being sued as the executor of the estate, she's being sued for negligence, or so the media reports claim. You're making it up, now.

339 posted on 02/24/2010 9:08:35 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson