Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Bring It! I Love It!" CPAC Speaker Gets Booed For Condemning CPAC For Inviting Gay Organization
Video from Cpac ^ | 2-19-10

Posted on 02/19/2010 5:51:20 PM PST by icwhatudo

The speaker, Ryan Sorba, was introduced to talk about his experiences with the ACORN investigation. Before he could even say a word the boos started from the assorted gay activists in the crowd. (Sorba is a frequent critic of the homosexual lifestyle).

Note that only AFTER the boos began did Sorba change the subject to condemning CPAC for inviting GOProud to CPAC.

He became flustered as any young man in such a situation would be on national TV, at a supposedly "conservative" event, being booed by homosexual activists...but his response that "Lesbians at Smith college protest better than you do" was pretty funny.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: borngayhoax; cpac; cpac2010; gaymafia; homosexualagenda; ryansorba; sorba; stenchofromney; twinkpac
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-131 next last
To: ABQHispConservative
I guess CPAC is being infiltrated by ‘progressive’ elements. Disgusting.

If so; Beck's speech tomorrow night should be REAL interesting...

61 posted on 02/19/2010 6:53:14 PM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ron Jeremy

Individual freedom means the freedom to not hire a homosexual for your daycare if you don’t want to, to not rent your spare bedroom to a homosexual if you don’t want to, to not have homosexual propaganda and recruitment in the public schools, to not have to attend homosexual “sensitivity training” in various organizations, schools, and agencies.

The homosexual agenda is the exact opposite of individual freedom.


62 posted on 02/19/2010 6:53:14 PM PST by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Individual freedom means the freedom to not hire a homosexual for your daycare if you don’t want to, to not rent your spare bedroom to a homosexual if you don’t want to, to not have homosexual propaganda and recruitment in the public schools, to not have to attend homosexual “sensitivity training” in various organizations, schools, and agencies. The homosexual agenda is the exact opposite of individual freedom.

I agree with you 100%. There is, however, a difference between a broad policy of advancing individual freedom, including on the issues you list above, and being opposed to "the homosexual lifestyle" as many conservatives are.

63 posted on 02/19/2010 6:55:16 PM PST by Ron Jeremy (sonic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?

Oh man! It should be epic.


64 posted on 02/19/2010 6:55:27 PM PST by ABQHispConservative (A good Blue Dog is an unelected Blue Dog. Ditto Rino's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

I agree totally. CPAC has been infiltrated by social issues and has trouble recognizing what true conservatives really are.

Probably why Jim Robinson stopped the affiliation between FR and CPAC. A move I totally support.


65 posted on 02/19/2010 6:56:14 PM PST by o_zarkman44 (Obama is the ultimate LIE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

It’s merely a branch of the homosexual agenda pushers. They’re not conservative in any way, shape or form. All they want is to push the “gay” agenda.

If the GOP caves on this, they’re freaking toast. They think donations are down now?

I just won’t vote any more. What would be the use? Vote between this stinking pile of excrement or the other stinking pile of excrement.


66 posted on 02/19/2010 6:57:36 PM PST by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Manta

They would find something else.


67 posted on 02/19/2010 6:58:47 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ron Jeremy

Then why are they even there? I despise their lifestyle but I also don’t care what they do in their privacy, just don’t try to mainstream it, which is their intent.


68 posted on 02/19/2010 6:59:28 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
Then why are they even there? I despise their lifestyle but I also don’t care what they do in their privacy, just don’t try to mainstream it, which is their intent.

Perhaps they believe in less taxes, less government, a strong military, etc.

69 posted on 02/19/2010 7:00:10 PM PST by Ron Jeremy (sonic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Saw some ‘Free State Project’ t-shirts in the crowd before Paul’s speech...that’s probably where the booing came from. The FSP is part of the reason New Hampshire now has ‘gay marriage’ on the books...


70 posted on 02/19/2010 7:00:25 PM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Ron Jeremy

You are wrong. Most conservatives are against the homosexual agenda. If sexual perverts want to do their thing in private, in their own houses, not in public beaches, parks, hiking trails and public bathrooms (yes, I’ve been driven out of all kinds of places because of their sick behavior), and not try to change the very face of America via legislation to suit their perversion, I could give a rip what they do - IN PRIVATE!

But that is not what they want. The homoseuxal agenda pushers do not want tolerance, THEY WANT DOMINANCE! And they have ZERO TOLERANCE FOR DISSENT!

AND I AM SICK OF IT!


71 posted on 02/19/2010 7:00:34 PM PST by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Ron Jeremy

Thats all good, but why identify yourself sexually if that is what they really care about?


72 posted on 02/19/2010 7:01:15 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Ron Jeremy

BS. The Log Cabin Republicans aren’t conservative at all. It’s just a propaganda arm of the gay agenda pushers. Most of them voted for 0bama.


73 posted on 02/19/2010 7:01:36 PM PST by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000; Ron Jeremy
Ron J: "... than worrying about what people do in their bedrooms."

Rome: "Then maybe the homos should shut the F88K up and stop trying to force normal people to accept their lifestyle as acceptable at gunpoint."

Ron, I don't know a whole lotta people, Republican or otherwise, who give a good doodly squat what people do in their bedrooms, and that isn't what this is about. What it's about is people who want us to know exactly what they do in their bedrooms and then want to deny us our God-given right to discriminate against open homosexuality in our communities, workplaces, youth organizitions, schools, and social gathering places.

If two people are roommates, I have no idea whether or not they're gay. The only time I know that they're gay is if THEY CHOOSE TO LET ME KNOW.

And if I know they're gay and I decide I don't want to rent to them, or serve them in my business, or employ them, or let them be in charge of my kid's Boy Scout or Girl Scout troop, or show up at my kid's school talking up the "gay lifestyle" as an okay option, then I should be able to do just that without fear of legal reprisal; by the same token, if I want to welcome them, cater to them in my business or rental property, or if I want to sponsor a group in which they parade their homosexuality openly, then that should also be my right without fear of legal reprisal, and indeed, we already have that SECOND right.

It's the FIRST right that the homosexual agenda wants to deny us. So the term "gay rights" is a parlor trick in two ways. First of all, it's not about homosexuality, it's about OPEN homosexualty. Second, it's not about endowing rights, it's about DENYING RIGHTS.

The gay agenda within the Republican party is an oxymoron. Limited government principle would make irrelevant, any place and any time, the private sexual activities of any legal adults.

74 posted on 02/19/2010 7:01:53 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

‘We’ve already lost the party. We are now in the process of losing CPAC and may soon have the Tea Party at risk as GOP tries to “moderate the tone.”’

Moderate the tone of the Tea Party. Come on that’s like hearding cats. It can’t be done. That is the beauty of the awakening called the Tae party movement. It’s a movement and an awakening with no single leadership, only Americans finally standing up to be heard.


75 posted on 02/19/2010 7:02:44 PM PST by RedMDer (Recycle Congress in 2010, 2012...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

76 posted on 02/19/2010 7:05:11 PM PST by maddog55 (OBAMA, Why stupid people shouldn't vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
Ryan Sorba, acting in the spirit of Sam Adams:

"It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men."

77 posted on 02/19/2010 7:05:57 PM PST by EternalVigilance (TATBO - "Throw All The Bums Out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron Jeremy
I think we would be much better off advancing broad agendas of less government and individual freedom that that vast majority of people share common ground on then worrying about what people do in their bedrooms.

Their behavior at CPAC tells us all that the queers wouldn't be satisfied.

Their ambition is is to force us to embrace their lifestyle.

We would be wise to reject them at every turn.

78 posted on 02/19/2010 7:09:05 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

To hell with Meghan McCain! To hell with HOMOPAC!


79 posted on 02/19/2010 7:10:35 PM PST by Jim Robinson (JUST VOTE THEM OUT! teapartyexpress.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABQHispConservative

It is why Sarah Palin stayed away isn’t it? They are being supported by John Birchers and worse these days.


80 posted on 02/19/2010 7:11:07 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson