Skip to comments.
Fed Raises Discount Rate; Fed Funds Rate Unchanged (to 0.75% from 0.5%)
FOXNEWS ^
| 2/18/2010
| Tom Granahan
Posted on 02/18/2010 1:39:50 PM PST by TSgt
Edited on 02/18/2010 1:48:02 PM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
The Federal Reserve on Thursday raised its discount rate to 0.75% from 0.5%, an effort to return its lending facilities to more normalized levels.
The Fed said the move, along with other recent modifications to its credit programs, does not signal a change in its outlook for the economy or for monetary policy, and the more important fed funds rate remains in its range of 0% to 0.25%.
The Fed usually changes the discount rate at the same time it does the fed funds rate, but after the unprecedented steps taken to combat the financial crisis, the Fed is eager to start bringing rates back to more traditional levels, and Thursdays move is a start.
Excerpt
TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bernanke; discountrate; economy; fed; fedrate; thefed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-104 next last
To: Toddsterpatriot
I agree it’s tiny at the current amount of lending, but I also think it’s foolish since credit is still frozen for all intents and purposes.
61
posted on
02/18/2010 3:40:33 PM PST
by
politicket
(1 1/2 million attended Obama's coronation - only 14 missed work!)
To: MikeWUSAF
62
posted on
02/18/2010 3:41:16 PM PST
by
blam
To: politicket
If no one is borrowing from the window, raising the rate 0.25% isn't going to kill the non-existent borrowing at the window.
63
posted on
02/18/2010 3:46:25 PM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
To: Toddsterpatriot
If no one is borrowing from the window, raising the rate 0.25% isn't going to kill the non-existent borrowing at the window. That's true, but it's sure not doing anything to help out the frozen credit situation.
64
posted on
02/18/2010 3:52:10 PM PST
by
politicket
(1 1/2 million attended Obama's coronation - only 14 missed work!)
To: MikeWUSAF
65
posted on
02/18/2010 3:52:37 PM PST
by
blam
To: MikeWUSAF
I expect a big hit on Wallstreet. -100 at least tomorrow.
66
posted on
02/18/2010 3:55:09 PM PST
by
Forgiven_Sinner
(If you meet people with no brain, no heart and no courage, you are not in KS-You are in the Congress)
To: OldDeckHand; All
I'm going to go with ammunition, maybe some MREs too.
Agree 100% with the ammunition.
But MRE's have a shelf life of 3 to 5 years. #10 cans have a shelf life of 25 to 30 years.
67
posted on
02/18/2010 3:56:01 PM PST
by
Red in Blue PA
(If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective!)
To: MikeWUSAF
oh great...the economy is slow as molasses and the baNKS WON’T LEND CRAP AND THE FED ACTS LIKE THERE IS TOO MUCH MONEY OUT THERE
EFFING a...THEY PRINTED IT FOR THEMSELVES
BASTARDS
68
posted on
02/18/2010 3:57:09 PM PST
by
wardaddy
(I have been in a serious RHCPers mood lately......)
To: MikeWUSAF
Since we’re not in an inflationary environment yet, but rather a deflationary one, I think this was done so we can sell T-bills to the Chinese.
69
posted on
02/18/2010 3:59:41 PM PST
by
Forgiven_Sinner
(If you meet people with no brain, no heart and no courage, you are not in KS-You are in the Congress)
To: politicket
Yeah, raising the rate doesn't help the frozen credit situation.
Raising the rate wasn't meant to help the frozen credit situation.
70
posted on
02/18/2010 4:02:20 PM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
To: Fishface
They should have raised the rates years ago. Credit was way to loose, and should have been slowed down.
The problem now isn’t that you can’t get a loan, it is that no one trusts the other guy.
71
posted on
02/18/2010 4:02:29 PM PST
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: 1066AD
Me also.
Was glad to see it, I use those fake cards as book marks and was running low.
72
posted on
02/18/2010 4:03:53 PM PST
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: Toddsterpatriot
Do you anticipate that this is a “first move” toward more tightening.
If they would have done this within the meeting notes I don’t think it would have been that big of a deal, but something happened, apparently, between then and now.
Doing it at this odd time and after the close puts uncertainty into the markets imo.
73
posted on
02/18/2010 4:07:07 PM PST
by
rbmillerjr
(I'm praying for Palin....if not I'll support Romney : He sucks but he's better than Obama.)
To: rbmillerjr
Do you anticipate that this is a first move toward more tightening. Yes. Their next move will be up, not down. LOL!
74
posted on
02/18/2010 4:11:11 PM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
To: Toddsterpatriot
You think that is inconsequential to the markets?
Gotcha.
75
posted on
02/18/2010 4:16:47 PM PST
by
rbmillerjr
(I'm praying for Palin....if not I'll support Romney : He sucks but he's better than Obama.)
To: rbmillerjr
You think that is inconsequential to the markets? Where did I say that?
76
posted on
02/18/2010 4:19:07 PM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
To: Mengerian
Didn’t the govt predict 16% inflation this year??
Stick with gold
77
posted on
02/18/2010 4:20:37 PM PST
by
GeronL
(I pledge allegiance to the Principles of the Bill of Rights and to protect and defend it...)
To: GeronL
and remember....this is all being done on purpose.
To: GeronL
Didnt the govt predict 16% inflation this year?? No.
79
posted on
02/18/2010 4:23:04 PM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
To: SlowBoat407; All
This image from the Drudge Report say it all:
80
posted on
02/18/2010 4:26:55 PM PST
by
foxfield
(Sarah Palin, America's "girl next door".)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-104 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson