Posted on 02/15/2010 6:58:57 AM PST by Vincent Jappi
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Civil Action: 10-151 RCL
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE Plaintiff,
HONORABLE ROYCE LAMBERTH PRESIDING v.
Barack Hussein Obama, Defendant.
APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
Notice of Application For Preliminary Injunction pursuant to LCvR 65.1 (c), LCvR 65.1 (d)
Plaintiff is seeking a Preliminary Injunction to recuse the US attorney’s office from representing the defendant.
Plaintiff is seeking a Preliminary injunction-Injunctive relief to obtain the vital records of the defendant prior to the February 26 deadline for document and response submission of the response by the Plaintiff to the CA Bar.
Plaintiff is seeking a preliminary injunction hearing within 20 days, as prescribed by LCvR 65.1 (d) to be scheduled by the court prior to March 1st.
Memorandum of point and authorities
The only relevant authority in this case, is the unanimous decision rendered by the Supreme Court of the United States and provided by the opinion written by two justices: John Paul Stevens and opinion by Steven Breyer.
“Sitting president of the United States has no immunity from civil law litigation against him from acts done before office and not related to the office”.
Clinton v Jones, 520 US 681 (1997).
Decision was made based on Article 2 of the Constitution of the United States.
Background of the Case and Factual Allegations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
(Excerpt) Read more at docs.google.com ...
It's hard to figure out if you are reading these different posts here on F.R. or are we in the twilight zone of D.U.???
Some people get a tingle up there leg on this subject.
Slithered out of your hole, did you?
I was just following Orly. And you, apparently, were just slithering along after me.
What no words of worship for your boy 0bamao?
Anyone and everyone has standing against the Communist usurper, as even a Kurdish or Zimbabwean peasant may die as a consequence of his usurpation.
Citizen of the world, eh?
A judge who refuses to examine the Usurper’s eligibility is indeed a traitor and deserves to be called such.
And yes, if he tries to retaliate against the truth-tellers he may thwart his own ploy to commit treason, as that would give standing to his purported victims.
To the extent that you are not yet in a banana republic, that is.
Which is very much in question given what the Usurper has gotten away with.
Those who have no arguments resort to name-calling.
But those are more generally found on the left.
To tell the truth in a Court of justice is what you are supposed to do in a Court of justice.
I mean, of course, a REAL Court of justice.
One without a kangaroo.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.