Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rachel Maddow Alleges Black Candidate Supports Jim Crow Voting Laws
David Horowitz's NewsRealblog ^ | Liz Blaine

Posted on 02/14/2010 1:57:48 PM PST by Michael van der Galien

Leftists can only succeed if good men don’t point at them and laugh. Ridicule, sneers and insults aimed at the right have become a trademark of MSNBC’s commentators, but Rachel Maddow took them to new heights last week providing an opportunity to turn the tables. Proving herself to be agenda-driven and ignorant, Maddow launched an uninformed assault against Alabama Tea Party candidate Les Phillip, a black businessman and Navy veteran who immigrated with his parents from Trinidad in his youth.

Following Meghan McCain’s recent appearance on ABC’s The View, which NRB covered here and here, where the ‘Valley Girl’ equated racism with a comment made at the Tea Party Convention regarding literacy tests for voting, Phillip responded with the statement,

“Ms. McCain has led a life of privilege and couldn’t understand the pressures of living paycheck to paycheck. I respect her father’s service to this country, but she ridicules what she cannot understand.”

Leaping to McCain’s defense, Maddow not only mocked Phillip but alleged he wants,

“To bring back Jim Crow era voting literacy tests that were used for generations in this country to deny black people the right to vote.”

Perhaps Maddow was assuming Phillip was another one of those angry white racist Republicans. Look again Rachel. Perhaps you should become familiar with both content and visuals aired on your show. It looks like the last laugh’s on you..........

(Excerpt) Read more at newsrealblog.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: 2010midterms; blackconservatives; duplicate; lesphillip; moonbats; msnbc; rachelmaddow; racism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 02/14/2010 1:57:49 PM PST by Michael van der Galien
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien
"Ridicule, sneers and insults aimed at the right have become a trademark of MSNBC’s commentators, but Rachel Maddow took them to new heights last week providing an opportunity to turn the tables."

I thought the entire raison d'etre of MSNBC was to strive for new lows, not highs.

2 posted on 02/14/2010 2:00:40 PM PST by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

I really have very little exposure to these people. But when I do happen to catch their act, it just amazes me that these so-called “journalists” see it as their job to defend Democrats 100% of the time and to ceaselessly ridicule anyone who opposes Democrats. They will say anything, make up any lies, assert the most preposterous allegations. All in service to their god.


3 posted on 02/14/2010 2:03:04 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (I was born in America, but now I live in Declinistan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2451303/posts


4 posted on 02/14/2010 2:04:24 PM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo (Political Correctness Will Get Us All Killed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

If ignorance kept people from voting Maddow wouldnt get a vote.


5 posted on 02/14/2010 2:05:17 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

Rachel, if you’re going to rip off Dennis Miller’s schtick, you could have left the hairdo and kept the intelligent, witty commentary.


6 posted on 02/14/2010 2:06:23 PM PST by domenad (In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

The right to vote is sacred.

The earlier rationale for limiting votes to property owners (tax payers) and persons who could read the candidates’ positions on issues resulted in disenfranchisement but the remedy that followed has caused chronic corruption.

Aware of the propaganda that attempts to secure votes by promising largesse to one group in return for taxing another - demonstrates the need to protect voters’ rights by education not brain washing.


7 posted on 02/14/2010 2:07:41 PM PST by sodpoodle (Despair - Man's surrender. Laughter - God's redemption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: domenad

She’s a bull dyke with a PHD,,,what do you expect?


8 posted on 02/14/2010 2:07:57 PM PST by Concho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien
Hmmm, she condemns literacy tests for voter then goes on to say that the word filibuster must be changed to attract voters interest because it's such a boring word.

That' just one of the problem with lib logic, they can't speak for more than a minute without contradicting themselves.

BTW Rachel, get a hair cut, and whats up with the eraser on top of that dudes head?

9 posted on 02/14/2010 2:22:12 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron ("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

This stupid bitch has about all the historical perspective and political intelligence God gave a f**king a mothball. And this is as polite as I can be without getting tossed off here.


10 posted on 02/14/2010 2:22:54 PM PST by John-Irish ("Shame of him who thinks of it''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Concho

The really sad fact though is there are people who listen to this bile and believe it. If only the good Lord would open their eyes.


11 posted on 02/14/2010 2:24:49 PM PST by animal172 (Can a girl with a mole on her face be happy married to a gopher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

he’s the cutest little boy i ever did see.


12 posted on 02/14/2010 2:53:05 PM PST by lonster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John-Irish

is directed at Megan McCain, Mr. Maddow or both :)


13 posted on 02/14/2010 2:53:35 PM PST by TV Dinners (Hope is not a Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I kept hearing about MSNBC but never watched it. So I decided the night that Scott Brown was elected to the Senate I’d tune in to Keith Olbermann.

How the heck does this guy keep a job? I wouldn’t hire him to flip burgers?


14 posted on 02/14/2010 2:54:04 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

I’ve never understood why she is on TV.


15 posted on 02/14/2010 2:56:00 PM PST by FTJM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonF

MSNBC is under the false assumption that they can be the liberal answer to Fox News. The problem is...every channel is a liberal channel outside of Fox...just a question of degree. And MSNBC now has become a laughingstock. Jon Stewart makes fun of them as often as Fox now, which shows you what a joke it is.

Rachel Maddow is simply a partisan idealogue who rants...Olbermann is just an idiot.


16 posted on 02/14/2010 2:56:14 PM PST by Neoavatara (http://neoavatara.com/blog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TV Dinners

Mr. Maddow. Ms. McCain is too dumb to even know what planet she’s on. Mr. Maddow at least knows that.


17 posted on 02/14/2010 3:25:49 PM PST by John-Irish ("Shame of him who thinks of it''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

Go away Rachel Mad-COW!


18 posted on 02/14/2010 3:27:32 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle
The earlier rationale for limiting votes to property owners (tax payers) and persons who could read the candidates’ positions on issues resulted in disenfranchisement but the remedy that followed has caused chronic corruption.

We should have kept the right to vote limited to property owners. Letting the unproductive have a vote is a recipe for disaster, as we are continuously discovering these days.

The Founding Fathers, as well as many political philosophers going back to the ancient Greeks, believed that direct democracy, where everyone gets a vote on everything, was the absolute worst form of government, because it would be mob rule - biggest majority gets to abuse everyone else. By expanding the franchise to every yahoo out there, we have brought ourselves closer and closer to that kind of ridiculousness, where the worthless societal leeches who live off of the public treasury are becoming the majority, and are constantly voting to steal money from those who actually work. No society can survive under those conditions, let alone thrive.
19 posted on 02/14/2010 3:54:31 PM PST by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Concho

Will you not however concede that she does indeed have a purdy mowf?


20 posted on 02/14/2010 3:57:07 PM PST by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson