Maybe we need a POTUS who can actually govern when there's snow on the ground - or govern at all, for that matter.
Posted on 02/14/2010 5:05:37 AM PST by IbJensen
Edited on 02/14/2010 5:14:39 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
The snows that obliterated Washington last week interfered with many scheduled meetings, but they did not prevent the delivery of one important political message: Take Sarah Palin seriously.
Her lengthy Saturday night keynote address to the National Tea Party Convention in Nashville and her debut on the Sunday morning talk show circuit with Fox News' Chris Wallace showed off a public figure at the top of her game -- a politician who knows who she is and how to sell herself.
(Excerpt) Read more at miamiherald.com ...
Enough said. Those picking at Gov. Palin can only nit-pick, but then that's what the Progressives do!
Yeah, it's hard to call a meeting if you've been obliterated.
True.They tried to make a Mimbo out of Scott Brown.November
can’t come fast enough!
If even those who approve of Sarah Palin insist on labels (Populist) then I insist on the label Communist for Barack Hussein Obama.
Maybe we need a POTUS who can actually govern when there's snow on the ground - or govern at all, for that matter.
Nice catch!
LOL!
Nice of the Herald to give some tips on how to destroy Palin. Still mystifying isn’t it? How can honesty, integrity and patriotism possibly be popular?!
>>If even those who approve of Sarah Palin insist on labels (Populist) then I insist on the label Communist for Barack Hussein Obama.
I’ve been calling him a communist since the summer of ‘08. My liberal acquaintances always whine, “Why do you have use labels?”
My answer is always, “Why do you call a cat a cat? Because that’s what they are! I don’t make them a cat by calling them a cat.”
Then B.S. the communist is shall be.
most excellent, and correct, too
One of the panelists (don’t recall who) on GIgot’s show last night nailed it. She said that it’s irrelevant whether or not Palin runs for President. What she represents is more important than what she does. She brings to light the chasm between elitist snobs and the regular folk. When the elites attack Palin, they are attacking you and me. That is her power.
The left’s only response to serious political challenges is to spew names and hatred, and this they’ve been doing to Sarah Palin since day one. They’ve never NOT taken her seriously, they’re just starting to admit it.
So David Broder is now the darling of Palin supporters?
Bob, you should be concerned for your own mental well-being that Broder is more analytical and rational on the subject of Sarah Palin than you are.
Yeah, that describes you to a 'T', Bob - uptight. Or, in more blunt terms, anally retentive.
Its not only progressives who are nitpicking. Everyone seems to be taking a shot at her these days.
Well, not everybody. 'Rats and other leftwing vermin, certainly; GOP rivals and their supporters, who see their hopes going down the drain; a few casual observers who just drink the media kool aid; jealous women; threatened males; homosexuals, abortionists and other Christian-haters. That's about it.
"The Herald" didn't write this. David Broder did. And it was previously published in the WaPo under a different title.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.