Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Although Fox is playing both sides in the story, they seem to push the ball ever so slightly forward in favor of the Climate Change kooks.
1 posted on 02/13/2010 7:35:16 AM PST by o2bfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: o2bfree

nothing wrong with admitting possibility of “climate change”- we all live on top of geological proof of climate change!

the KOOKS think it is getting warmer and MANKIND and our CARBON caused it and MANkind can control it by limiting carbon.... LOL!


2 posted on 02/13/2010 7:38:20 AM PST by silverleaf (My Proposed Federal Budget is $29.99)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: o2bfree

we need a list of the most active activists that favor this fraud and then send them a copy of the RICO act... along with their AG in their state.


3 posted on 02/13/2010 7:38:28 AM PST by gibtx2 (keep up the good work I am out of work but post 20 a month to this out of WF Check)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: o2bfree

“It’s absurd for the ‘anti-science side’ to say we’re in a cooling trend when we’re in an overall warming trend,” says Romm of the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank

See, you’re just a stupid hick if you don’t accept the AGW “science” says a liberal think tank spokesman who is, I’m sure, well versed in climate science. Like those fine folks at the IPCC and UEA.


4 posted on 02/13/2010 7:38:45 AM PST by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: o2bfree; Carlucci; proud_yank; meyer; Horusra; Para-Ord.45; rdl6989; mmanager; FreedomPoster; ...
 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

5 posted on 02/13/2010 7:38:53 AM PST by steelyourfaith (FReepers were opposed to Obama even before it was cool to be against Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: o2bfree

Does this mean that, “counterintuitively”, global cooling will lead to record heat waves?

Just wonderin’


6 posted on 02/13/2010 7:40:01 AM PST by Walrus (My congressman is toast in 2010 --- how about yours?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: o2bfree

7 posted on 02/13/2010 7:41:45 AM PST by o2bfree (This president is giving me a headache!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: o2bfree

You accept the label “anti-science,” you lose the debate.

Label yourself “anti-alarmist.” Very reputable scientists are on the anti-alarmist side.


9 posted on 02/13/2010 7:44:32 AM PST by StAntKnee (I keep thinking I'm gonna wake up from this dream theatre of the absurd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: o2bfree

Climate change is a fcat and no one disputes te climate has “changed” several times over the past thousands of years. It gets warmer then it gets cooler. In this the science is indeed “settled”

What science needs to determine is the WHY of climate change and here is where the science is anything but settled. Trying to use human activity to explain the recent global warming (now cooling) does not explain the medieval warming period and others shown to have occurred by the examination of deep sea core samples.


11 posted on 02/13/2010 7:44:44 AM PST by 101voodoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: o2bfree

“It’s absurd for the ‘anti-science side’ to say we’re in a cooling trend when we’re in an overall warming trend...”

I can’t think of anything more anti-science than what went on at East Anglia and the IPCC which proves that Global Warming is a religion, not science. This is just their way of saying anyone who thinks or can prove differently is a heretic.

This is dangerous stuff that needs to be challenged head on, and I am astounded at the lack of public outrage at the climate change fanatics.


15 posted on 02/13/2010 7:48:51 AM PST by dajeeps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: o2bfree

I think Fox is going more and more lefty mainstream. I find it difficult to watch a lot of Fox when they let the Rats dominate the debate!...combo of bad $ invested (Arabs) and the owner is getting old. time for a real Conservative Broadcasting Network and maybe a real Conservative Party???


20 posted on 02/13/2010 7:55:01 AM PST by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: o2bfree

OK the F*ckers have been caught not telling the truth and going off bogus information. Why is this even a debate. I have heard, “well we still should investigate to find out the truth”. Of course I’m thinking if it was the truth, then why would you have to lie for over 20 years?

It’s all crap. The four necessary elements to sustain life is water, the Sun, oxygen and carbon dioxide. Life cannot sustain without any one of those four necessary elements. Nothing is more profitable then taking 1 of the 4 necessary elements to sustain life and call it a pollutant.


21 posted on 02/13/2010 7:55:23 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: o2bfree

The series of snows this winter have all been fed from The warm Pacific moist air being carried by a mostly sub-tropical jetstream, meeting midwest arctic air over significantly populated areas of the U.S.

Where the two meet and at high altitudes like the Rockies the snow has been heavy at times.

This jet has persisted for weeks now but has started to shift south where it likely will bring storms to the islands — Cuba, Carribean, and Haiti/Dominican Republic.

Get ready for the next set of floods in your headlines to further devastate the Port Au Prince earthquake areas.


22 posted on 02/13/2010 7:56:02 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: o2bfree

Article is very misleading, just where did Jeff Masters claim recent slow storms prove/support GW?


23 posted on 02/13/2010 7:57:36 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: o2bfree
Although Fox is playing both sides in the story, they seem to push the ball ever so slightly forward in favor of the Climate Change kooks.

I just saw a similar report on pMSNBC.

They didn't just move the ball. The cleared the goalie, they moved the kicker to the 3 yard line, they dug a ditch so the ball would roll in.

They had their own GW commentator who adamantly stated it was clearly global warming causing the cold weather, trash talked the deniers, and there was not a peep of balance.

Buy Hey! It was pMSNBC.

24 posted on 02/13/2010 7:57:51 AM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution - 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: o2bfree

Climate change happens all the time....but blaming it on man is nuts. The Socialists see a way to redistribute wealth and remove individuality. That’s the problem. Living in mud huts, smoking pot/hemp all day long and eating boiled grass is what they would love to see for everybody...except for them.


25 posted on 02/13/2010 7:59:49 AM PST by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: o2bfree

... uh Fox People ... you attention please ... thank you. The debate is OVER. The story is the futility of these people trying to raise a DEAD issue from its grave.


28 posted on 02/13/2010 8:04:53 AM PST by ThePatriotsFlag (http://www.thepatriotsflag.com - The Patriot's Flag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: o2bfree

There is no global warming debate.

There is presentation of truth and a rebuttl of lies


30 posted on 02/13/2010 8:11:17 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Tax the poor. Taxes will give them a stake in society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: o2bfree

It’s absurd for the pro-Gore Scam side to say we are in man-made Global Warming trend when thousands of weather stations were shut down and ignored and they are extrapolating temperatures from the cities into the countryside!


31 posted on 02/13/2010 8:19:19 AM PST by Titus-Maximus (Light from Light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: o2bfree

How do they know that snow is consistent with Global Warming, if Global Warming is so new?

Somebody is full of crap.


32 posted on 02/13/2010 8:47:00 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: o2bfree

“Heavy snow is not evidence that climate science is false,”

True.
But it is also not evidence that AGW is true.

(Note: Do not use the word “climate change”. It makes not sense as climate is always changing. Do not let them get away from their Anthropogenic Global Warming predicitons. User the term AGW in every discussion of the issue.)


33 posted on 02/13/2010 8:47:56 AM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson