Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ban gay marriages, Republican gov hopeful says (Bill Brady)
The Chicago Sun-Times ^ | 2-11-10 | Dave McKinney

Posted on 02/12/2010 2:25:32 PM PST by TitansAFC

SPRINGFIELD -- The GOP gubernatorial front-runner Wednesday proposed changing the state Constitution to ban same-sex marriages, make it more difficult to pass state tax increases, impose term limits on lawmakers and overhaul the process of redrawing legislative boundaries.

"I'm trying to give the government back to the people," said Sen. Bill Brady (R-Bloomington), when asked what the package says about him as a candidate for governor.

The same-sex marriage prohibition would prohibit gay marriages and civil unions.

Brady is proposing a 10-year limit on Illinois House and Senate members, who face no constraints now, and a two-thirds vote requirement in the General Assembly for passage of sales or income tax increases.

His other proposed amendment would take the decennial job of redrawing legislative boundaries from the partisan-controlled Legislature and turn it over to the bipartisan State Board of Elections.


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: bill; billbrady; brady; governor; homosexualagenda; il2010; illinois; issues
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
I am looking to start a Brady/Plummer ping list for the rest of the campaign. If you or anyone you know is interested, let me know!
1 posted on 02/12/2010 2:25:33 PM PST by TitansAFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: holdonnow; HonestConservative; kristinn; RaceBannon; Bahbah; mware; PhilCollins; BillyBoy

If there’s an IL ping list, please ping it!


2 posted on 02/12/2010 2:27:54 PM PST by TitansAFC (The Left does not devote so much effort into attacking Sarah Palin because she's a weak candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks

ping


3 posted on 02/12/2010 2:29:33 PM PST by TitansAFC (The Left does not devote so much effort into attacking Sarah Palin because she's a weak candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

He’s trying to give the government back to the people by further entrenching the state’s role in regulating human relationships. Nice doublespeak there.

How about a real step in the right direction? Acknowledge the human right of freedom of association.


4 posted on 02/12/2010 2:30:37 PM PST by MichiganConservative (I wouldn't hate the government if it didn't exist. (Evil + Stupid) === Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichiganConservative

“He’s trying to give the government back to the people” by acknowledging the will of the people.


5 posted on 02/12/2010 2:33:07 PM PST by Persevero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

The people want to be told what to do? The people get the government they deserve.

Well, when they come for the homeschoolers, check to see if it’s popular, and say “it’s the will of the people”.


6 posted on 02/12/2010 2:34:58 PM PST by MichiganConservative (I wouldn't hate the government if it didn't exist. (Evil + Stupid) === Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MichiganConservative

How about acknowledging the COURTs’ massive overstep (of their power) in FORCING gay marriages upon state and local governments nationwide. If you were logically consistent in your position you would realize that the state has no business being in the marriage business at all.

In fact if they did MOST churches would not recognize gay marriages, and in fact if governement were to get out of recognizing marriage all together we would have to massively restructure our tax system first!


7 posted on 02/12/2010 2:41:19 PM PST by JSDude1 (www.wethepeopleindiana.org (Tea Party Member-Proud), www.travishankins.com (R- IN 09 2010!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1
If you were logically consistent in your position you would realize that the state has no business being in the marriage business at all.

True. This proves that the "separation of church and state" is a myth. When a minister marries a couple, he (or she) is acting as an Agent of the State.

8 posted on 02/12/2010 2:45:52 PM PST by pray4liberty (Liberalism is the religion of narcissists. You read it here first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

When Republicans make statements like this, I’m more and more hopeful for the party. But count on a herd of RINO’s to shoot him down.


9 posted on 02/12/2010 2:48:31 PM PST by fwdude (It is not the liberals who will destroy this country, but the "moderates.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichiganConservative

I’m interested in what you’re saying. Could you be more specific here?


10 posted on 02/12/2010 5:09:09 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC; PhilCollins; spintreebob; MichiganConservative; JSDude1; fwdude; Impy; ...
Very solid conservative plan by Brady, but notice how the liberal media presented it. Brady actually proposed a LIST of various legislative priorities he intends to push for as Governor, ONE of which included banning activist politicians and judges from forcing gay marriage and/or “civil unions” on the state. The media reported on only this item and left out the REST of Brady's proposals. This is probably the start of a plan to define him as a “scary” social conservative against gays and abortion who is “too right-wing” for Illinois. Brady needs to avoid being painted in a corner by the Chicago media thugs who will try to caricature him. Certainly I welcome his views on protecting traditional marriage — even supposedly “good conservative” Jim Ryan was way too milquetoast to publicly propose a ban on gay marriage. As for the rest of Brady's reform package that the media failed to report, we have some excellent items that we can take to the voters in November:

— Allow any school district - by board vote or public referendum - to implement a voucher system, and he would increase the private-school tax credit (now $500 a kid per year) 50% a year until it reaches the state-aid foundation level of about $6,000 a year.

— Repeal the sales tax on gasoline, eliminate much of the estate tax and repeal business-tax hikes pushed through by ex-Gov. Rod Blagojevich - a total of about $1 billion a year in revenues. (which means single issue goof Jim Tobin of Tax Accountability will have to stop his rhetoric about how RAT Rod Blagojevich was “better on taxes than any Republican”)

— Enact a 10-year limit on Illinois House and Senate members, who face no constraints now. Limit members of the state House of Representatives to five terms and members of the Illinois State Senate, who serve staggered two- or four- year terms, to a maximum of three terms. Legislators who are term-limited out of office could seek to return after being out of office for six years. Fifteen other states impose term limits on legislative service. Statewide officials would be limited to three terms in any one office

— Change the state constitution to enact a two-thirds vote requirement in the General Assembly for passage of any sales or income tax increases.

— Pass amendment to take the decennial job of redrawing legislative boundaries from the partisan-controlled Legislature and turn it over to the State Board of Elections. Responsibility for drawing legislative district maps would be given to the State Board of Elections with a mandate to maintain current county, city and township boundaries to the greatest extent possible.

— Return to what’s known as cumulative voting for the House. Under his plan, the Senate would be trimmed from 59 members to 41, with three House members elected from each Senate district.. Returning to multi-member House districts with no more than two being from the same political party and slightly reducing the size of the Illinois General Assembly. Three representatives would be elected from each of 41 Senate districts, trimming the size of the legislature to 164 members from the current 177.

— Impose the federal restrictions on individual campaign contributions on Illinois legislative and statewide candidates. Individual contributions could not exceed $4,800 per election cycle including the primary and general election contests. Corporate and union contributions would be prohibited, and political action committees could contribute no more than $5,000 per election cycle.

BTW, does anyone know if Randy Stufflebeam is still insisting on running for Governor on the Constitution Party ticket? That's the last thing we need is Pat Quinn winning election because 0.2% of voters decide they want someone who says the right thing 100% of the time instead of only 95% of the time. Randy told me himself in 2006 that he would have had a rough time running if Brady was the nominee because Brady was a solid conservative so Randy would have given second thoughts if Brady was the choice in November. Four years later, I talked to him and he backed off that in this year's primary, giving me the usual third party kool-aid that Adam Andrejewski was the only acceptable GOP candidate on the planet. I told Randy that about 90% of conservatives I know would have no problem if Brady, Proft, or Adam were the nominee, but Randy sounded pretty stubborn a very weeks ago. I hope he backs down. I won't support getting him on the ballot against Brady, I hope we can all agree on that and tell him so.

11 posted on 02/12/2010 6:02:00 PM PST by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Sign me up for the list, please.


12 posted on 02/12/2010 6:26:13 PM PST by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; chicagolady; Impy

ChicagoLady says that Stufflebeam is supposedly switching to run in the Senate race, but I’ve seen no other links to confirm this.


13 posted on 02/12/2010 6:29:07 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Yep Randy needs to be a team player. IL needs Republican government again, but not in the image of Jim Thompson.


14 posted on 02/12/2010 6:30:00 PM PST by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

That’s stupid. All Stufflebeam will do is guarantee a Dem. Senate win in IL.


15 posted on 02/12/2010 6:30:50 PM PST by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MichiganConservative

I don’t advocate for simply doing the will of the people. I just pointed out that the candidate is promising to do the will of the people.

There is no lofty moral purpose to homosexual marriage. It’s not about civil rights. It’s not genetic. It’s a deviant mental illness that is demanding public approval. I wouldn’t want to approve any other faux “marriage” constructions, either.


16 posted on 02/12/2010 6:33:06 PM PST by Persevero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

Um, we don’t want Combiner Socialist scum Kirk to win. When Sen. Alexi goes to jail, Gov. Brady will appoint a RESPECTABLE non-liberal non-Combiner to the vacancy.


17 posted on 02/12/2010 6:40:43 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Perhaps he could call it the Contract With Illinois.


18 posted on 02/12/2010 7:01:05 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (Liberal sacred cows make great hamburger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

You proudly hope for the election of a corrupt, liberal, Combiner Democrat. That is pretty much all that needs to be said about your priorities and lack of perspective based in reality.


19 posted on 02/12/2010 8:12:12 PM PST by zebrahead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: zebrahead
My priority is to elect an ethical Conservative Republican to the Senate, not mindlessly cheerlead and shill for yet ANOTHER crooked liberal Combiner as you're doing. Mark Kirk is no more our ally than Alexi or the trash in the White House. If you can't recognize that, I suggest, sir, it's your priorities and sense of reality that are out of whack.
20 posted on 02/12/2010 8:26:22 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson