Posted on 02/12/2010 1:22:29 PM PST by pissant
Weve always banned truthers at RedState. Increasingly, we have also banned a number of individuals who think Barack Obama is disqualified from being President because despite the Republican Governor of Hawaii confirming the legitimacy of the Democratic Presidents birth origin as a citizen of the United States.
Today I want to reaffirm and make it more definitive. If you think 9/11 was an inside job or you really want to debate whether or not Barack Obama is an American citizen eligible to be President, RedState is not a place for you.
Birfers and Truthers are not welcome here. Period. End of Story.
But I want to expand on this too.
The tea party movement is in danger of getting a bad reputation for allowing birfers and truthers to share the stage. At the National Tea Party, Joseph Farah treated the birfer issue as legitimate. In Texas, tea party activists have rallied to Debra Medina who, just yesterday, refused to definitely dismiss the 9/11 truther conspiracy as crackpot nonsense. If a candidate cannot do that, we cannot help that candidate. Its that simple.
(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...
It is YOU, toots, that thinks its a good idea to ban people. You just frickin said so. So have at it and ban yourself.
The first to oppose Scozzafava? I don’t think so. I seem to remember this turd pushing Rudy McRomney though.
I never said anything about banning anyone as being a good thing. And no thank you. I have been here a long time. Think I will stay awhile. And hope you will do the same. I have no idea what you think I said that constitutes banning people being good. I shudder at the thought of banning people with whom we do not agree. Why would anyone want to do that, Sparky?
Interesting backpeddal considering your post 69.
They want us to be divided.
And they want us to shut up about the need to have our laws followed and for the American people to be vigilant.
I refuse to do either. Red State can fight the battles they want to fight. And I will continue to speak about our need to have the laws followed and to be vigilant.
We’re big enough we don’t have to say they have cooties, even when they accuse us of having them. This nation is in too much peril for us to be so juvenile.
pissant, you and I have talked before. Never have I been rude to you. Nor would I. You know that.
Re-read your own post 69
DJ..I am not backpedalling. I said nothing about banning anyone. And..hello, DJ. Good to see you.
Pissant, I just did as DJ just pointed it out. I never said anything about banning anyone. Sorry if it sounded as though that was what I meant. I do not see it. Sorry.
Because it never happened.
But there are some real things that have been said and done that you probably haven’t heard of either. http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/
Apparently not since you posted this.
Post 69: good for him. good grief. The tea party does not need these people. None of us do.
This post states you agree with silencing opposing opinions.
Red State can buzz off.
Free Republic has lead the way by allowing 0bama’s birth to be investigated. For me 0bama is not natural born because his daddy was a foreign subject. Of Britain or Kenya depending on how you look at it
>> Maybe Frank Davis is his real father. <<
Maybe so. But I vote for Malcolm X.
(I heard somewhere that Stanley Ann Dunham and Malcolm X were both in Seattle nine months before the Big Ø was born.)
This is what you wrote:
“good for him. good grief. The tea party does not need these people. None of us do.”
****************
“Good for him”, to me, implies you agree with his decision to ban birthers. “The tea party does not need these people”, to me, means that you think the Tea Party too is better off without so-called birthers. “None of us do” tells me that YOU feel better off not associating with so called birthers.
Hence, the suggestion you leave. Don’t want to see you muddied up with rabble like us, and all.
Sorry then. No...not silenced on this board. Maybe I could have articulated my opinion better. Would not be the first time. The tea party in Nashville refused to let anyone in who had posters or tshirts on that questioned his birth..or had the joker on it...or had anything to do with Nazis..Read THEIR statement on same. They said themselves they did not want to be associated with people who were extreme in their beliefs. We can argue policy with this administration all day..there are dozens of arguments we can make about a myriad of subjects....and we are well within our rights to do so..without bringing up his birth certificate or his faith or the size of his ears. Read what they said in Nashville. They were the ones who said they were putting a stop to this.
If his father was Barack Hussein Obama then he isn’t eligible. But we don’t even know who his father was until we see the birth certificate.
And at this point we’ve got enough criminal activity documented in regards to the cover-up of his birth certificate that it should force an investigation by somebody other than the DC Circuit “Magnificent Seven”, who are apt to butcher the law anyway.
Obama can’t be declared to be ineligible without the eligibility court cases. But the judges can just poo-pooh the whole thing like they’ve been doing all along unless the public is keeping them honest. The criminal activity in Hawaii should alarm the public enough that we demand answers and accountability to the law.
Ultimately, if people are more informed about the illegal activities surrounding the birth certificate it will HELP the eligibility cases. We need to use both hands, to heal this nation.
http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/
Information about how corrupt things are in Hawaii:
Please read my post to DJ below...thank you pissant.
And the tea party in Texas has said it will follow suit.
Redstate? never heard of ya!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.