Here's a picture of it.
As those of us from the North East would say, "That's wicked cool!"
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: Reaganesque
38 posted on
02/12/2010 6:51:00 AM PST by
RobRoy
(The US today: Revelation 18:4)
To: Reaganesque
Way wicked cool. Automotive beauty. This design should allow for pretty good maneuverability at high speeds. Would love to watch these race at 240 mph - screaming engines, weaving cars, smoking tires...awesome!
To: Reaganesque
Been done.... ROFL....
Old news.....
**************
Humor only.... have a great day!
40 posted on
02/12/2010 6:54:13 AM PST by
Wings-n-Wind
(The main things are the plain things!)
To: Reaganesque
If the race series folks want to increase fan interest, why don't they go back to what built their base: (1) Take the “ground effects” and aerodynamic crap off the cars and let it become engines and drivers deciding a race. (2) Stop changing the rules constantly so that one or two team are guaranteed to win. This is especially true for nascar
41 posted on
02/12/2010 6:54:25 AM PST by
sticker
To: Reaganesque
Everything old is new again
The 1953 Firebird 1
To: Reaganesque
Pretty stealthy looking. Do you suppose they could add a pair of internal weapons bays to hold a few sidewinders? Could be pretty helpful in Indy Races and even better in a NASCAR event.
46 posted on
02/12/2010 7:00:17 AM PST by
Jeff F
(austinaero; Phoenix11; WaterBoard)
To: Reaganesque
One problem: it’s not open-wheeled.
I’m still disappointed that NASCAR standardized their cars. Has Indy done it also?
50 posted on
02/12/2010 7:17:28 AM PST by
frposty
(I'm a simpleton)
To: Reaganesque
I’m thinking great for the straights, not so good in the twisty-turny stuff.
51 posted on
02/12/2010 7:18:03 AM PST by
IYAS9YAS
(The townhalls were going great until the oPods showed up.)
To: Reaganesque
That would be “wicked pissah”
To: Reaganesque
Looks pretty cool, but I don’t know, I’m just not feeling it for IndyCar. They should run an open series, like F1 used to be, for cars like these. I’d watch that.
58 posted on
02/12/2010 7:25:29 AM PST by
Ace of Spades
(Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Reaganesque
i have lived in Indiana my whole life and never once set foot inside the Indianapolis Motor Speedway. if that car was on the track i might be inspired to go.
60 posted on
02/12/2010 7:31:41 AM PST by
madamemayhem
(defeat isn't getting knocked down, it's not getting back up)
To: Reaganesque
71 posted on
02/12/2010 8:17:45 AM PST by
Jeff Chandler
(:: The government will do for health care what it did for real estate. ::)
To: Chode; Betis70; bobby.223; brf1; cld51860; Cowboy Bob; Daffynition; darthxenu; devane617; ...
ping...
74 posted on
02/12/2010 8:49:52 AM PST by
Chode
(American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: Reaganesque
It must be a retro style,...I notice all those aerodynamic features in the body style they took from the aircraft industry just like in the 50s, big fins, air scoops like a jet air intake, even that phony cockpit,...like its really gonna go faster.....huh?
77 posted on
02/12/2010 9:28:07 AM PST by
Cvengr
(Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
To: Reaganesque
GM Firebird, ca. 1953:
78 posted on
02/12/2010 9:33:30 AM PST by
Erasmus
(Buffalo: "I never met an Indian I didn't like, with the possible exception of Deepak Chopra.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
