Here's a picture of it.
As those of us from the North East would say, "That's wicked cool!"
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: Reaganesque
2 posted on
02/12/2010 6:15:46 AM PST by
JRios1968
(The real first rule of Fight Club: don't invite Chuck Norris...EVER)
To: Reaganesque
3 posted on
02/12/2010 6:16:08 AM PST by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: Reaganesque; sully777; vigl; Cagey; Abathar; A. Patriot; B Knotts; getsoutalive; muleskinner; ...
Rest In Peace, old friend, your work is finished.....
If you want ON or OFF the DIESEL KnOcK LIST just FReepmail me.....
This is a fairly HIGH VOLUME ping list on some days.....
4 posted on
02/12/2010 6:16:10 AM PST by
Red Badger
(Education makes people easy to lead, difficult to drive; easy to govern, but impossible to enslave.)
To: Reaganesque
I like the 2+2 coupe version...
5 posted on
02/12/2010 6:16:17 AM PST by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Reaganesque
Barf...
I wouldn’t watch those race at gunpoint...
6 posted on
02/12/2010 6:17:33 AM PST by
ltc8k6
To: Reaganesque
Do you have trunk space for the team owner's kid and a chimp?
7 posted on
02/12/2010 6:17:51 AM PST by
KarlInOhio
(Special SOTU tagline: YOU LIE!)
To: Reaganesque
There's a video simulation
Here.
9 posted on
02/12/2010 6:19:23 AM PST by
Reaganesque
("And thou shalt do it with all humility, trusting in me, reviling not against revilers.")
To: Reaganesque
10 posted on
02/12/2010 6:19:24 AM PST by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)
To: Reaganesque
i bet that rear wheel would tend to lift inside of turns... if the wide apart wheels were in front, it would be more stable in turns...
11 posted on
02/12/2010 6:19:50 AM PST by
camle
(keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
To: Reaganesque
I can see it now, the cars go screaming into turn one and every one of them keeps going straight. There’s no way that thing could make a high speed turn.
12 posted on
02/12/2010 6:21:50 AM PST by
BubbaBasher
("Liberty will not long survive the total extinction of morals" - Sam Adams)
To: Reaganesque
Rear is wider than the front. Isn’t that a safety concern? You pass the car in front of you, close, and then your rear hits his car because the rear is wider.
14 posted on
02/12/2010 6:24:25 AM PST by
Woebama
(Never, never, never quit)
To: Reaganesque; camle
This really pushes the envelope of being an "open-wheel" racer. Unless there is some aerodynamic advantage, they should just cover the tops of the wheel, and become "open-cockpit" racing instead of "open-wheel".
Also, I agree with camle that it may have problems in the corners. However, it would be interesting to see this thing doing test laps.
To: Reaganesque
Finish out those fenders and you could have both an IRL and a NASCAR version.
19 posted on
02/12/2010 6:33:25 AM PST by
umgud
(I couldn't understand why the ball kept getting bigger......... then it hit me.)
To: Reaganesque
This is Brian France quality stupidity!
21 posted on
02/12/2010 6:34:53 AM PST by
Niteranger68
("Obama voters will pay dearly!")
To: Reaganesque
Yuck. Gives new meaning to the term Fugly.
22 posted on
02/12/2010 6:36:01 AM PST by
reagan_fanatic
(The liberals are asking us to give Obama more time. Is 25 to life enough?)
To: NormsRevenge; tubebender; glock rocks; Pete-R-Bilt
Not a Nascar, more like, “something wicked this way comes!”...wow!
23 posted on
02/12/2010 6:36:04 AM PST by
LasVegasMac
(Islam: Bringing the world death and destruction for 1400 years!)
To: Reaganesque
Pretty soon you’ll be saying “That’s sick” as our California teenagers do.
To: Reaganesque
It resembles two Land Speed Record cars from the 1960’s - the Summers’ Brothers Goldenrod in the front, and Breedlove’s Spirit of America from the windscreen back. So it should be fast in a straight line. When wind is blowing across the track, as it does at Indianapolis, that rear fin would be detrimental. It also produces unnecessary drag. As do those sidepods. But as a styling exercise, it does look cool.
29 posted on
02/12/2010 6:40:42 AM PST by
popdonnelly
(Yes, we disagree - no, we won't shut up - no, we won't quit.)
To: Reaganesque
I would like to try a theory of aeronautical principles of creating an artificial "supercavitaion" of the surface area immediately in front of a vehicle, possible utilizing sonic wave emitters set at a certain frequency to create a dead air space. Bicyclists have reached over 100 mph by being in the slipstream behind a railway passenger coach decades ago, and of course we all know what "drafting" is in Nascar. The latest high speed underwater missile/torpedoes use the effect of turning the area ahead into steam to reduce the effects of drag. In theory air molecules could be "shoved" aside like a wedge by sound.
30 posted on
02/12/2010 6:41:05 AM PST by
Eye of Unk
("Either you are with us or you are for the terrorists." ~~George W. Bush)
To: Reaganesque
Complete and utter total disaster. Nothing at all indicating that there may be an internal combustion engine powering the thing. I suppose that is the point.
I long for the old days when there were many different builders and cars.
Green credentials huh? BARF. Perhaps you can cap and trade seconds off your lap time if you have X number of solar cells. Or if you don’t spin the tires the entire race, or for not making “jackrabbit starts”. What, now even MOTOR racing has to appeal to women?
I wouldn’t watch that global citizen crap for anything.
Supposed to be the Indianapolis 500.
As in almost everything, excessive rules and regulations makes for boredom and destroys the spirit of adventure and achievement.
32 posted on
02/12/2010 6:45:29 AM PST by
ecomcon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson