Here is the quote."Instead, Keyes formed a new third party, America's Independent Party, for his presidential candidacy."
And here is the photo
Posted on 02/10/2010 6:51:19 PM PST by Engineer_Soldier
To clarify, so you support a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants?
I do because I understand why people would want to be in America. To seek the safety and prosperity, the opportunities, the health that is here. It is so important that yes, people follow the rules so that people can be treated equally and fairly in this country.
(Excerpt) Read more at univision.com ...
Here is the quote."Instead, Keyes formed a new third party, America's Independent Party, for his presidential candidacy."
And here is the photo
You didn’t hear her speech Saturday did you?
This is what Obama said in the STOU:
"And we should continue the work of fixing our broken immigration system -- to secure our borders and enforce our laws, and ensure that everyone who plays by the rules can contribute to our economy and enrich our nation."
What people are "undocumented workers?"
Right. If you don’t have the actual reference, don’t post a comment in FR.
As if that is how things work here.
GET A GRIP! The appropriate links will come along.
Whose agenda are you supporting?
Nevermind - stupid question.
It’s inaccurate then. The America’s Independent Party page tells the truth.
Who you gonna believe, the chairman and founder of the party in question, or Wikipedia?
Tom Tancredo said that.
We are well beyond that point now. Do you have a SSN?
The folks who believe the propaganda against Sarah Palin
may want to check in with
Jim Robinson, Michael Reagan, Laura Ingraham, Rush Limbaugh,
Mark Levin, and a very long list of other good Conservatives
who support Sarah Palin
I'm supporting the same agenda I've always supported. Secure borders. Adherence to the rule of law. Protection of our nation's sovereignty and national security. Whose agenda are you supporting?
This thread is not legitimate.
The exact same interview has been posted on FR at least 10 times and been totally discredited. Not to mention the guy that started the thread not only changed the heading from what it was at the link, he lied as well.
“But, if you really want to see “robust”? Just watch the backlash from the people of this country if you try to keep playing word games with them on this. “
What planet are you living on, dude?
There is a massive backlash and anger in this country right now, and it's not against Sarah Palin. It's against 0bama, Pelosi, Reid, and the Democrat controlled congress.
“75% Are Angry At Government’s Current Policies
Voters are madder than ever at the current policies of the federal government.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 75% of likely voters now say they are at least somewhat angry at the government’s current policies, up four points from late November and up nine points since September. The overall figures include 45% who are Very Angry, also a nine-point increase since September. “
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/february_2010/75_are_angry_at_government_s_current_policies
That is where the real voter anger is at. The good new is, Sarah Palin benefits from all that voter anger, becuase se is not part of te cossupt 0bama/Pelosi/Reid unholy trinity. sa matter of fact, she is headlining an anti=Reid political rally at Reid's hometown.
“Because of this issue more than any other, Sarah Palin’s endorsement of John McCain's reelection to the Senate has done her more real political damage than all the unjustified petty personal attacks on her put together”
Nonsense.
Show me even one poll where it says voters are angry at Sarah Palin because of immigration.
Stop making things up.
Bull, people are shocked to learn that they are trying to answer to a current party chairman, with real skin in his anti Palin agenda here.
Read the thread, it makes some people angry to find out that he is a professional that is quietly trying to dis rail his opponent and them not knowing who he is.
Do you think having a social security number and having to get permission from a bureaucrat to work are the same thing?
Not you too!
God help me - the scales are falling off.
The lines are being drawn.
NO, this movement is not about any one leader, including Sarah Palin which she said over and over again.
And every “leader” is accountable to “the people” of this country - which she also said over and over and over again.
Sarah Palin has zero fear about her positions on any issue.
She is solid, she is humble, and she is right.
And anyone who truly doesn’t see this yet - I would suggest they move on and do their own thing. Fine.
Have a good time.
But stay the heck away from here....
I spoke to her advisors last year at CPAC. I told them that she needed to keep McCain at arms length because he is toxic and that she needed to revise her position on amnesty.
Some of us didn't just fall off a turnip truck. We know what "a pathway to citizenship" means. And we know when politicians are hedging on important questions.
Who are you trying to kid? He’s been here almost as long as I have and he’s been connected to Alan Keyes for years. His FR page links to his party affliation and he’s forever promoting his party and its candidates here.
You will have a hard time working without an SSN or even getting a drivers license.
EV you really are not a trustworthy person, the way that you slip around and evade responding honestly and truthfully as a party chairman is startling, and disturbing
Who would you guess might emerge as your 2012 candidate?
I’ll say it again: Your constant harrassment of me from thread to thread and your continuous posting of twisted lies about me grows tiresome. At a minimum, you’re violating FR’s rules. People like you poison the debate at FR.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.