Skip to comments.
Time for Obama to go 'gangsta' on GOP
CNN.com ^
| 2/10/10
| Roland S. Martin
Posted on 02/10/2010 2:50:53 PM PST by Kartographer
For me, I'm sick and tired of Democrats having power and being unwilling to use it. I've always respected Republicans when they had power because they were willing to use it and maybe apologize later.
Today, President Obama walked into the White House briefing room and took some questions, and one of them revolved around recess appointments.
He has watched Republicans block many of his appointments, and now he says he made it clear to them that he will "consider" making some when the U.S. Senate goes into recess.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gangsta; pantsontheground
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 last
To: Kartographer; All
41
posted on
02/10/2010 4:17:35 PM PST
by
backhoe
(All Across America, the Lights are being relit again...)
To: Kartographer
“gangsta” is another word for epic failure?
42
posted on
02/10/2010 4:48:44 PM PST
by
cranked
To: exnavy
Word!
Keep up this Gangsta talk and expect a GOP majority in BOTH houses next year.
43
posted on
02/10/2010 5:36:50 PM PST
by
WOSG
(OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
To: Kartographer
Does Obama go Gangsta before or after his grey poupon topped Wagyu steak dinner? It's all too badass to believe.
44
posted on
02/10/2010 5:39:38 PM PST
by
Shqipo
(I am snowed in for the duration.)
To: Kartographer
Only if Sugar-Daddy George Soros tells him to do so.
45
posted on
02/10/2010 5:44:11 PM PST
by
FourPeas
([F]or hostility is a relation and an enemy is not a total stranger. C.S. Lewis, Perelandra)
To: sphinx
During the Bush Administration, Harry Reid kept the Senate in pro forma session during breaks in order to prevent President Bush from making recess appointments. If the rules allow it, the Republicans should do likewise. Sauce for the goose, sauce for the gander. One problem returning the favor - the Republicans would have to run the Senate in order to do that. Dingy was leader of the Senate when he did the pf sessions.
46
posted on
02/10/2010 6:13:37 PM PST
by
Christian4Bush
(Mike/Chris Wallace: Did you give in? Palin: "HELL NO!" 267 days til Phase 2. Phase 3 - 2012.)
To: Riley
OHS would be a closer guess. Closer, but not really accurate.
Go Pirates! :o)
47
posted on
02/10/2010 6:18:14 PM PST
by
DGHoodini
(Iran Azadi!)
To: Christian4Bush
Perhaps, but I don’t know the rules well enough to be sure. On procedural matters the Senate ordinarily acts by unanimous consent. The Republicans could object to a motion to stand in recess.
48
posted on
02/10/2010 6:23:05 PM PST
by
sphinx
To: pogo101
“I need a rulebook here.”
See my tagline. Also, Apache justice for all LIBs.
49
posted on
02/11/2010 4:09:46 AM PST
by
NTHockey
(Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
To: sphinx
PUBs should object to EVERY single “unanimous consent” motion until this insanity stops. That means sitting still for EVERY bill being read out loud; debating EVERY motion to adjorn and demanding countless quorum calls.
A non-functioning government is better than an out of control government.
50
posted on
02/11/2010 4:17:11 AM PST
by
NTHockey
(Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
To: Kartographer
For the whole "bring it on" crowd:
Clinton made mincemeat of Gingrich when he decided to "bring it on" over the budget, and Gingrich was A LOT smarter than this crowd.
The President, even this one, has HUGE structural advantages in a scripted public confrontation with Congress, especially with the minority.
I think they should stick with "there's nothing to discuss, let's talk about it in November".
51
posted on
02/11/2010 4:21:25 AM PST
by
Jim Noble
(Hu's the communist?)
To: tflabo
I've always respected Republicans when they had power because they were willing to use it and maybe apologize later.Republicans got things done because they were willing to compromise.
I've heard DEM talking heads say they couldn't understand why Dems have gotten so little through Congress. They ask how Bush was able to get so much legislation done. Easy! He compromised and his policies were popular with grassroots America.
52
posted on
02/11/2010 4:29:49 AM PST
by
REPANDPROUDOFIT
(Hey General, I would be honored to have you call me "ma'am" !)
To: Kartographer
The author is clueless. Thanks for posting.
53
posted on
02/11/2010 8:35:51 AM PST
by
neverdem
Comment #54 Removed by Moderator
To: Kartographer
I couldn’t get past the fantasy in that first sentence.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson