Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Core Chicago Team Sinking Obama Presidency
The Washington Note ^ | February 7, 2010 | Steve Clemons

Posted on 02/08/2010 8:52:51 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Financial Times Washington Bureau Chief Edward Luce has written a granularly informed insider account about those who hold the keys to the inner most sanctum of Obama Land -- Rahm Emanuel, Robert Gibbs, Valerie Jarrett and David Axelrod.

It's a vital article -- a brave one -- that interviews "dozens of interviews with his closest allies and friends in Washington".

Most are unnamed because the consequences of retribution from this powerful foursome can be severe in an access-dependent town. John Podesta, President of the powerful, adminstration-tilting Center for American Progress, had the temerity and self-confidence to put his thoughts publicly on the record. But most others could not.

Mark Schmitt, executive editor of the liberal magazine American Prospect, wrote that "Luce has written what seems to me the best and most succinct rundown of what's gone wrong in the White House, with particular attention to the role of Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel." But some of the big aggregators out there -- Mike Allen at Politico and ABC's The Note among others -- didn't give Luce's juicy and lengthy essay any love.

Why not? Allen is a good friend of mine and tries to keep a good balance between tough-hitting political stuff but also goes out of his way to give strokes to those in the White House he can -- particularly "Axe" -- who is a regular in Mike's daily Playbook. I try to do the same to be honest and have a particular thing for Bill Burton's wit and was pleased to see Rahm Emanuel giving David Geffen rather than Rick Warren lots of hugs during the Inauguration eve fests.

But this Luce piece is unavoidably, accurately hard-hitting, and while many of the nation's top news anchors and editors are sending emails back and forth (I have been sent three such emails in confidence) on what a spot-on piece Luce wrought on the administration, they fear that the "four horsepersons of the Obama White House" will shut down and cut off access to those who give the essay 'legs.'

But in the too regularly vapid chatter about DC's political scene, serious critiques of the internal game around Obama not only deserve review on their own merits but have to be read -- because Obama is not winning. He is failing and people need to consider "why".

Any serious survey of the Obama administration's accomplishments and setbacks over the last year has to conclude that the administration is deeply in the red.

If current trends continue, this once mesmerizing Camelot-ish operation will be be seen in the history books as the presidential administration that -- to distort slightly and inversely paraphrase Churchill -- never have so many talented people managed to achieve so little with so much.

The entire article needs to be read, but to set the stage here is the beginning of Ed Luce's portal into the heart of today's Obama machine:

At a crucial stage in the Democratic primaries in late 2007, Barack Obama rejuvenated his campaign with a barnstorming speech, in which he ended on a promise of what his victory would produce: "A nation healed. A world repaired. An America that believes again." Just over a year into his tenure, America's 44th president governs a bitterly divided nation, a world increasingly hard to manage and an America that seems more disillusioned than ever with Washington's ways. What went wrong?

Pundits, Democratic lawmakers and opinion pollsters offer a smorgasbord of reasons - from Mr Obama's decision to devote his first year in office to healthcare reform, to the president's inability to convince voters he can "feel their [economic] pain", to the apparent ungovernability of today's Washington. All may indeed have contributed to the quandary in which Mr Obama finds himself. But those around him have a more specific diagnosis - and one that is striking in its uniformity. The Obama White House is geared for campaigning rather than governing, they say.

In dozens of interviews with his closest allies and friends in Washington - most of them given unattributably in order to protect their access to the Oval Office - each observes that the president draws on the advice of a very tight circle. The inner core consists of just four people - Rahm Emanuel, the pugnacious chief of staff; David Axelrod and Valerie Jarrett, his senior advisers; and Robert Gibbs, his communications chief.

Two, Mr Emanuel and Mr Axelrod, have box-like offices within spitting distance of the Oval Office. The president, who is the first to keep a BlackBerry, rarely holds a meeting, including on national security, without some or all of them present.

With the exception of Mr Emanuel, who was a senior Democrat in the House of Representatives, all were an integral part of Mr Obama's brilliantly managed campaign. Apart from Mr Gibbs, who is from Alabama, all are Chicagoans - like the president. And barring Richard Nixon's White House, few can think of an administration that has been so dominated by such a small inner circle.

"It is a very tightly knit group," says a prominent Obama backer who has visited the White House more than 40 times in the past year. "This is a kind of 'we few' group ... that achieved the improbable in the most unlikely election victory anyone can remember and, unsurprisingly, their bond is very deep."

John Podesta, a former chief of staff to Bill Clinton and founder of the Center for American Progress, the most influential think-tank in Mr Obama's Washington, says that while he believes Mr Obama does hear a range of views, including dissenting advice, problems can arise from the narrow composition of the group itself.

To hit some of the later highlights, Luce speaks with political giants 'inside' the Obama tent who suggest that Rahm Emanuel lost track of the importance of communicating to the public about health care, despite some success in legislative deal-making. While Luce doesn't explicate this topic, I would also suggest that Rahm pulled the plug on shuttering GITMO, which had a good plan on paper, but was unwilling to move the political wheels to get that done -- not understanding that this was a key pillar of progressive political support for Obama.

The article goes on to document how people like Health Secretary and former Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius were kept off television -- along with others like Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. Add to this others that Luce does not name -- including important voices like Paul Volcker and Austan Goolsbee on Obama's economic team, who saw their public voices choked off by a media-dominating Lawrence Summers with support from Robert Gibbs and Rahm Emanuel.

In a particularly cutting depiction of Emanuel, Luce writes:

Administration insiders say the famously irascible Mr Emanuel treats cabinet principals like minions. "I am not sure the president realises how much he is humiliating some of the big figures he spent so much trouble recruiting into his cabinet," says the head of a presidential advisory board who visits the Oval Office frequently. "If you want people to trust you, you must first place trust in them."

I will never forget when Rahm Emanuel laughingly responded well within earshot of several national media (and this blogger/writer) at an Inaugural bash to an inquiry if Emanuel was enjoying putting Tom Daschle on the basement floor of the White House in a non-descript office pretty far from the President. Emanuel joked back glibly that Daschle had to be happy with any office in the White House because "any square inch of real estate inside the White House -- no matter where it is -- is more valuable than anything outside it."

Compare this flippant meanness and hubris to the tone of Obama campaign manager David Plouffe's depiction of the campaign in Audacity to Win: The Inside Story and Lessons of Barack Obama's Historic Victory and one couldn't imagine more different worlds. Plouffe describes a campaign with a "no assholes" rule -- one where good policy would be pursued -- not just what was a winning political hand.

Luce's brief paints a picture of even a well-meaning, policy-focused "Obama the man" being warped out of shape by "Obama the team." Recounting some of the antics during Obama's November China trip, Luce recounts:

The same [dismissal of his key policy advisers in lieu of his political entourage] can be observed in foreign policy. On Mr Obama's November trip to China, members of the cabinet such as the Nobel prizewinning Stephen Chu, energy secretary, were left cooling their heels while Mr Gibbs, Mr Axelrod and Ms Jarrett were constantly at the president's side.

The White House complained bitterly about what it saw as unfairly negative media coverage of a trip dubbed Mr Obama's "G2" visit to China. But, as journalists were keenly aware, none of Mr Obama's inner circle had any background in China. "We were about 40 vans down in the motorcade and got barely any time with the president," says a senior official with extensive knowledge of the region. "It was like the Obama campaign was visiting China."

One wonders why Valerie Jarrett was on the trip in any case. As head of public engagement for the White House, it would seem she should have a rather full plate meeting the demand of the many groups around the United States that want to feel like they are connecting with and being heard by the Obama White House.

I see Valerie Jarrett a lot -- often at Georgetown's power crowd restaurant, Cafe Milano.

In fact, one night when I was at the annual gala dinner of Jim Zogby's Arab American Institute -- an important evening for leading figures from the Arab-American community to connect with the Washington political establishment -- Jarrett was on the docket to be the major keynote speaker of the entire night.

Jarrett, however, had to modify her schedule because of what she said were "urgent duties that were calling her back to the White House right away" and so she gave a few minutes of laudatory comments toward the Arab American community before most people were in their seats between reception and sitting down for dinner. My hosts that evening said that they were mainly interested in hearing her and asked me if I wanted to depart with them for Cafe Milano. I said sure -- and wow -- there Ms. Jarrett was.

Maybe she did stop at the White House between the JW Marriott and the Georgetown hot spot. That was possible -- but it would have had to be a nano-second drop by.

Compare this to President Bill Clinton giving the major keynote remarks in March 1995 at the Nixon Center's opening conference in Washington at the Mayflower Hotel when Clinton came early for a VIP reception, stayed for the entire sit down dinner, gave a 90 minute long speech, and mingled with folks after.

People can tell when you are focused on them in a serious way -- and when you are giving them a cursory glance.

There are things that happen in politics -- and Valerie Jarrett does have important duties and a schedule that is probably always in constant flux -- so I don't want to take my critique too far.

But one thing essential to understand is that the kind of policy that smart strategists -- including by people like National Security Adviser Jim Jones, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and other advisers like Denis McDonough, Tom Donilon, James Steinberg, William Burns, (previously Gregory Craig) -- would be putting forward is getting twisted either in the rough-and-tumble of a a team of rivals operation that is not working, or is being distorted by the Chicago political gang's tactical advice that is seducing Obama towards a course that has not only violated deals he made with those who voted him into office but which is failing to hit any of the major strategic targets by which the administration will be historically measured.

President Obama needs to take stock quickly. Read the Luce piece. Be honest about what is happening. Read Plouffe's smart book again. Send Rahm Emanuel back to the House in a senior role. Make Valerie Jarrett an important Ambassador. Keep Axelrod -- but balance him with someone like Plouffe, and get back to putting good policy before short term politics.

Set up a Team B with diverse political and national security observers like Tom Daschle, John Podesta, Brent Scowcroft, Arianna Huffington, Fareed Zakaria, Katrina vanden Heuvel, John Harris, James Fallows, Chuck Hagel, Strobe Talbott, James Baker, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and others to give you a no-nonsense picture of what is going on.

And take action to fix the dysfunction of your office.

Otherwise, the Obama brand will be totally bust in the very near term.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho44; chicagoway; obama; obamaadmin; obamastaffers; rahmemanuel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Ouch!
1 posted on 02/08/2010 8:52:51 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; kristinn; onyx; Liz; STARWISE; Bahbah; maggief; LucyT; nutmeg

Interesting....Anything we didn’t know?


2 posted on 02/08/2010 8:57:07 PM PST by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If this is courtesy of John Podesta, we can be sure that it’s utter pap and misdirection! I didn’t bother reading it, since it is clearly loaded with lies and slanted information designed to mislead the gullible.


3 posted on 02/08/2010 8:58:34 PM PST by Rembrandt (.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Tom Daschle, John Podesta, Brent Scowcroft, Arianna Huffington, Fareed Zakaria, Katrina vanden Heuvel, John Harris, James Fallows, Chuck Hagel, Strobe Talbott, James Baker, Zbigniew Brzezinski"

When this list of losers is better than the crew running things now you know why we're in such desparate shape.

4 posted on 02/08/2010 9:00:49 PM PST by hometoroost (I am not a crook, I did not have sex with that woman, and I am not an ideologue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sinking like a Kennedy Oldsmobile. Yeah, that kind of sinking.


5 posted on 02/08/2010 9:02:53 PM PST by healy61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

6 posted on 02/08/2010 9:04:13 PM PST by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Actually it’s Socialism. If they were free market capitalists they would probably be succeeding.


7 posted on 02/08/2010 9:06:36 PM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So Chicago thugocracy is dragging Obama down. Heck those are some of his closest friends and confidants. I doubt if Obama knows any other way to govern. Bwahahahaha.


8 posted on 02/08/2010 9:07:38 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"With the exception of Mr Emanuel, who was a senior Democrat in the House of Representatives, all were an integral part of Mr Obama's brilliantly managed campaign. Apart from Mr Gibbs, who is from Alabama, all are Chicagoans - like the president. And barring Richard Nixon's White House, few can think of an administration that has been so dominated by such a small inner circle."

Nope. Rahm Emanuel was not a *senior* Democrat...and he was the architect of 0bama's campaign. The article got both points wrong. For that matter, 0bama didn't even run a well managed campaign...during the campaign itself he broke at least two campaign promises (filibuster Telecom Immunity and use Public campaign funds instead of Wall Street donations).

Notice no real mention of Ted Kennedy and John Kerry, nor of Geithner or various Harvard/Wall Street advisors to 0bama.

Mayor Daley?! Bill Ayers?! Rev Wright?! Tony Rezko?!

Which is to say, the article is bunk...perhaps a trial balloon being floated to see if a "shakeup" in staff will bump 0bama's ratings, who knows.

9 posted on 02/08/2010 9:11:34 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

arianna huffington? please....


10 posted on 02/08/2010 9:12:49 PM PST by GodfearingTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: healy61
Roll that tape again of Hitler in the bunker, the last days....

with a new set of captions to fit this article.....

enjoy.

11 posted on 02/08/2010 9:12:53 PM PST by spokeshave (Third largest employer in the world is UK health system, after the Chinese Army and Indian railways)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"He is failing and people need to consider "why". "

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fourth edition, DSM IV-TR, a widely used manual for diagnosing mental disorders, defines narcissistic personality disorder (in Axis II Cluster B) as:[1]

A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:

1. has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)

2. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love

3. believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)

4. requires excessive admiration

5. has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations

6. is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends

7. lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others

8. is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her

9. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes

It is also a requirement of DSM-IV that a diagnosis of any specific personality disorder also satisfies a set of general personality disorder criteria.

12 posted on 02/08/2010 9:13:09 PM PST by matthew fuller (GO GREEN!!! Recycle the Senate and Congress in 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hometoroost

Putting tiny Tom first in that list is deeply disturbing.


13 posted on 02/08/2010 9:13:52 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hometoroost

Correct, the mere mention of Vanden-Heuvel, Talbott and Huffington should scare the crap out the entire nation.


14 posted on 02/08/2010 9:13:52 PM PST by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; hoosiermama

“Set up a Team B with diverse political and national security observers like Tom Daschle, John Podesta, Brent Scowcroft, Arianna Huffington, Fareed Zakaria, Katrina vanden Heuvel, John Harris, James Fallows, Chuck Hagel, Strobe Talbott, James Baker, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and others to give you a no-nonsense picture of what is going on..”

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

That’s his best advice? Those people?!!


15 posted on 02/08/2010 9:20:16 PM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I guess if you wanted to tell a good friend that they’re a screw up, a letter written like this article would suffice quite well.


16 posted on 02/08/2010 9:23:10 PM PST by randog (Tap into America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I hope they bring in as many of these idealogues as they want, the more the merrier, until they create an odious turdpile that collapses under its own absurdity. The $120K-$180K salaries of these idiot eggheads might turn out to be the best money the Republic has ever spent if it causes them to spew forth their gobbledygook ideas until even those with 73 IQs can see how stupid it all is. At this point I urge them to proceed with all abandon. Run it right up onto the rocks, s**theads.


17 posted on 02/08/2010 9:24:01 PM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (Voters who thought their ship came in with 0bama are on their own Titanic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
to see if a "shakeup" in staff will bump 0bama's ratings, who knows.

When he's at the bottom anything he does could give him a bump-up. Add public image to the list of things he's already bungled.

18 posted on 02/08/2010 9:27:25 PM PST by budwiesest (It's that girl from Alaska, again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: budwiesest
The important point is that the article has so *many* verfiable errors and omissions, plus that the article comes come that snake Podesta, that it is clear that the writing is designed to mislead.

Don't believe the article!

19 posted on 02/08/2010 9:30:23 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Well, it is the Clinton team fighting with the Obama team over our carcass. Podesta’s list of those to be included with his recommendations would add little to handling our predicament. The Dems any way you look at them have NO potentially successful answers to the current debacles arising.


20 posted on 02/08/2010 9:32:38 PM PST by givemELL (Does Taiwan Meet the Criteria to Qualify as an "Overseas Territory of the United States"? by Richar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson