Clinton appointee Judge Michael A. Ponsor
Hey, judgey, I’m really bothered by your racist reference to troubles at a “chicken place”. Leftist racist a—hole.
Gotta stay away from them there chicken places. Everyone draws a gun. And how many chicken places have gun drawings, say last year?
That is the dumbazz statement ever. One gun drawn against a robber may save 16 lives, too.
It is going to take fifty years to undo the leftists ideals in Massachusetts. We need to start this year!
Remember in November and in 2012.
Best case scenario in a constitutional republic via states rights via the 2nd amendment response would be "none of your damn business employee of mine".
Neither are likely listed on the resumés of people waiting for judicial appointments, nor should they be.
Further, if once thus appointed, a Judge displays a penchant for this type of wanton excursion into sheer and unbidden fantasy concerning firearms and crowded public dining facilities, he should be permanently removed from the bench and remanded to the professional care of a State mental institution for observation until it can be clinically demostrated that these violent fantasies currently pose no threat to himself or the people of the Commonwealth, and that neither are they likely to so threaten in the future.
In breif, the man is an idiot who should be under professional care and possible brainwave suppressing medication, not sitting on the bench in a courtroom making decisions which require clear, unprejudiced thought processes and a thorough understanding of all applicable Statutes.
God help us. It's human filth like this which necessitated the writing of the 2nd Amendment in the 1st place.
IMHO
;-/
Let a govt have the power to issue a license, don’t be surprised if its employees feel entitled to demand to see it. One could call this the Papiere Bitte rule.
Employers can legally ban their workers from bringing firearms to the job site.
“I’m really appalled to hear that that many people are carrying guns.””
This judge is a typically leftist thug who uses his personal feelings to MAKE law.
He should be immediately impeached as he has provem, by his comments and subsequent decision, to be unfit for the position.
Whatever happened to search and seizures in Mass?
CONSTITUTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS:
“Article XIV. Every subject has a right to be secure from all unreasonable searches, and seizures, of his person, his houses, his papers, and all his possessions. All warrants, therefore, are contrary to this right, if the cause or foundation of them be not previously supported by oath or affirmation; and if the order in the warrant to a civil officer, to make search in suspected places, or to arrest one or more suspected persons, or to seize their property, be not accompanied with a special designation of the persons or objects of search, arrest, or seizure: and no warrant ought to be issued but in cases, and with the formalities prescribed by the laws. “
http://www.mass.gov/legis/const.htm
Did the officer have a court issued warrant to not only search this man for a firearm but seize from him that weapon?
You can’t just take someone’s property because you THINK they don’t have the legal right to carry it.
This is to say nothing of this clause of the CONSTITUTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS:
“Article XVII. The people have a right to keep and to bear arms for the common defence. And as, in time of peace, armies are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be maintained without the consent of the legislature; and the military power shall always be held in an exact subordination to the civil authority, and be governed by it. “
http://www.mass.gov/legis/const.htm
What is wrong with this state.. they don’t even follow their own laws. Perhaps they no longer possess a Republican form of government? ...
As one of Massachusetts founders and authors of their Constitution John Adams said:
“They define a republic to be a government of laws, and not of men.” - John Adams, Nocangul No. 7, 1775
We should make this a federal issue and bring down the eyes of the Federation upon the little commonwealth of Massachusetts, on the question of whether or not they still have a republican form of government as is required by the U.S. Constitution.
For those of you unaware of the legal procedure in Massachusetts ...
In order to own, purchase or possess a “long gun” such a a rifle or shotgun (or pepper spray!) or ammunition for same you must apply to your local police department for a Firearms ID.
To own, purchase or possess a handgun or ammunition, you must apply to the local constabulary for a License to Carry, aka “pistol permit.”
Some police chiefs are cool about firearms, while others are frosty cold. The chief has lots of discretion in his town. The first time I applied for a License to Carry in my home town, the sergeant in charge of licensing said, “Do you belong to a sportsmen’s club?” Answer: no. “Then come back when you.” The only way I got my permit was because my boss was the sergeant’s brother-in-law, and he called the sergeant and reamed him out.
I’ve been told that you can take a denial to the Clerk Magistrate and they’ll call in the chief of police to explain exactly WHY you can’t have a permit, but I’ve never tried that procedure nor heard of anyone who has, although I’m sure it wouldn’t make you any friends down at the stationhouse.
My “permit” is a Class A “large capacity” version but I don’t know what other options there are. My permit was issued with no restrictions but I’m told our new police chief in town only grants permits for “target practice only.”
Oh, and the permit, good for 6 years, costs $100. I hear a lot of towns require proof that you have attended a certified firearms safety course.
Also, the only handguns that can be sold in Massachusetts are those approved by the state, and last time I looked Kimber wasn’t on the list. (And I love the Kimber .45!)
So this is the legal crap gun owners have to suffer through in Massachusetts.
Not to be a nitpicking grammarian, but is it actually possible for a bullet to ricochet 16 times thereby changing its direction each time???....
Hmmmm! 10-rnd clips in each of just four hip-pocket customer guns...Shooting starts....Each bullet ends up traveling in 16 directions...The chicken place is suddenly filled with a veritable cloud of gunfire with ammo zinging around in a total of over 600 lines-of-fire...
Going to awfully tough to survive in there...
/sarc
United States (SCOTUS) Case not only ruled against the Second Amendment, but also the First.
“The first amendment to the Constitution prohibits Congress from abridging 'the right of the people to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.' This, like the other amendments proposed and adopted at the same time, was not intended to limit the powers of the State governments in respect to their own citizens, but to operate upon the National government alone.”
But the First Amendment specifically designates the Congress is prohibited. The Second Amendment broadly states that the right ... shall not be abridged. "By anybody" is obviously implied.
Only happens in chicken places. In macho places, it’s strictly mano-a-mano.
Or, was she calling certain parts of Boston chicken**** places?
Or, maybe the whole state?
I really wish she had defined “chicken places”, as it is hard to believe that a Clinton appointed, female Democrat judge could be (Shhhhhh!) RACIST!