To: sonofstrangelove
2 posted on
02/03/2010 10:18:43 PM PST by
garjog
(Used to be liberals were just people to disagree with. Now they are a threat to our existence.)
To: sonofstrangelove
UAV: Unmanned Aquatic Vessel. Most likely controlled via HAARP.
To: sonofstrangelove
No need to sleep. No fear. No families. No pain.
...
No love of country. Terrible idea.
4 posted on
02/03/2010 10:20:05 PM PST by
Eyes Unclouded
("The word bipartisan means some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out." -George Carlin)
To: sonofstrangelove
Actually most modern ships with up-to-date navigational systems, do this already.
To: sonofstrangelove
Drone anti-sub ships are strikingly good ideas!
6 posted on
02/03/2010 10:22:12 PM PST by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: sonofstrangelove
8 posted on
02/03/2010 10:23:41 PM PST by
garjog
(Used to be liberals were just people to disagree with. Now they are a threat to our existence.)
To: sonofstrangelove
Suppose it suddenly disappears, then what?
9 posted on
02/03/2010 10:24:32 PM PST by
dr_lew
To: sonofstrangelove
To: sonofstrangelove
17 posted on
02/03/2010 10:29:43 PM PST by
Mount Athos
(A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
To: sonofstrangelove
-.— -— ..- .... .- ...- . - .... . .-. .. —. .... - - -— .-. . — .- .. -. ... .. .-.. . -. - .-.-.- .-.-.-
To: sonofstrangelove
Just hope the gas pedal doesn’t get stuck.
23 posted on
02/03/2010 10:37:50 PM PST by
Bhoy
To: sonofstrangelove
I like it. I want half a dozen. With lazers that can slice stuff up at 40 miles. Muhuhahahaha.
24 posted on
02/03/2010 10:37:57 PM PST by
SaxxonWoods
(Gone Galt and loving it)
To: sonofstrangelove
Would it do anything useful that a manned fleet isn’t doing now? Like sinking pirate ships?
29 posted on
02/03/2010 10:52:33 PM PST by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: sonofstrangelove
Actually, it will have a captain... The ship
must have a captain...
31 posted on
02/03/2010 11:31:44 PM PST by
Redcloak
(Don't try this at home... I'm a professional!)
To: sonofstrangelove
If one of these robovessels gets into an accident, wonder how long it will take for the gummit to become aware of it.
33 posted on
02/03/2010 11:45:11 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: sonofstrangelove
The plans go right to China AS they are being developed, and will be hacked 17 minutes into service upon completion.
We are F--ked. Have a nice future.
34 posted on
02/03/2010 11:53:21 PM PST by
Captainpaintball
(If the right has TEABAGGERS, then the left has SCUMBAGGERS and DOUCHEBAGGERS!!!)
To: sonofstrangelove
Ever crewed on a Naval vessel? I have.
Ships have LOTS and LOTS of stuff on them — and stuff breaks. Quite often. Unless you constantly maintain it. EVEN if you constantly maintain it.
This isn’t a relatively simple unmanned drone that goes up and comes down (for maintenance by PEOPLE) in fairly short order.
Not saying it’ll never happen, but I am saying we don’t have the technology right now to make a reliable, robust unmanned vessel of this nature — and we won’t for some time to come.
They’re probably wise to start noodling on it though.
39 posted on
02/04/2010 2:10:28 AM PST by
Nervous Tick
(Eat more spinach! Make Green Jobs for America!)
To: sonofstrangelove
Will it shoot ghost missiles?
42 posted on
02/04/2010 9:35:50 AM PST by
NTHockey
(Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
