Posted on 02/03/2010 1:08:56 PM PST by Fenix Guy
The Arizona Republic has printed a barrage of articles, editorials, and guest op-eds by attorneys lately highly critical of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and County Attorney Andrew Thomas. When attorneys like Dennis Riccio, below, try to submit an article with a positive viewpoint of Arpaio and Thomas, the Republic can't turn their bias aside enough to print even one positive article.
My Turn: Enough of Prejudging Thomas and Arpaio
It is disturbing reading many of the editorials and op-eds in this newspaper about Sheriff Arpaio and County Attorney Andrew Thomas's attempts to prosecute Supervisors Stapley and Wilcox and investigate the Court Tower. The writers rush to judgment accusing Arpaio and Thomas of unethical behavior, without knowing the full facts. Only Arpaio and Thomas have seen the results of the investigations, search warrants and subpoenas. Most of this information is still privileged until the prosecution is over, and some of it - the Grand Jury information - will never be publicly releasable. The newspaper editorial board and criminal defense attorneys are acting as judge and jury prematurely deciding cases in public they know very little about.
The public has a right to be skeptical of a $341 million state of the art, luxury Court Tower being built during a recession, while county agencies, including law enforcement, are forced to cut 15% of their budgets by laying off employees. With the exception of columnist Laurie Roberts, this newspaper has failed to ask the hard questions, and even her questions have gone unanswered. Why is this luxury tower being built even though the county cannot afford it? People deserve to know answers.
There is a serious problem with one county agency decimating others so it can have more power. It is especially unsettling when the agencies it is cutting are law enforcement. If there is one thing everyone in society can agree upon, it is that public safety is the most important function of government. Without law and order, society is chaos. Instead, taxpayers' money is being redirected to bloated county government, where money is handed out like candy to promote diversity programs, multiple failed environmental awareness campaigns, and millions of dollars in subsidies to the private sector.
Even more alarming is how the Supervisors have been able to stop the Sheriff and prosecutor from prosecuting them - Supervisors Stapley and Wilcox - by attacking them and cutting off their resources. It is a double standard of justice that those accused of white collar crime are able to get away with these kind of stunts to avoid prosecution.
The accusations against Supervisor Stapley are appalling. It is a slap in the face to the citizens of Maricopa County that the other Supervisors just elected him last week as Chairman of the Board of Supervisors. He has been indicted on multiple felonies for financial misreporting and misusing campaign funds. The kinds of things he is alleged to have spent campaign funds on cannot be ignored: $6000 at Bang and Olufson electronics, along with $1300 for hair implants, $400 for candle holders and $10,000 for furniture for his home. He also spent these funds, solicited as campaign money, to buy tickets to Broadway plays and movie theatres, flowers, grocery store bills, massages, department stores and trips for his family to Sundance, Utah to ski, a trip for his son and friends to Florida and a three-week vacation in Hawaii for his entire family at a beach house costing approximately $11,000.
It is not surprising that criminal defense attorneys are submitting op-eds to the newspaper attacking Arpaio and Thomas. If criminal defense attorneys are attacking the prosecutor and Sheriff, you know they must be doing their job well.
When enterprises turn to only furthering their own agendas, they deserve to fail.
Not surprising.
The allow comments for articles bashing Arpaio and Thomas, yet on sites that involve criminals of a certain ethinic background or on illegals (migrants as they call them) they don’t allow comments.
Used to be a good paper, 20 years ago. Piece of Trash, for the most part now.
Those of us just to the north (Yavapai County) wish he worked up here, but recognize he is a great man in a really horrible environment (created by the press and the politicians :( )
and I DO NOT read the AZ Republic. Buy it, get the coupons for the missus, then toss it :)
Why support a criminal enterprise by even buying the crapfest for some lousy coupons?
Starve the crummy bastards.
Only on Sundays, and you should SEE how much my wife saves!!! ;)
We get only the Sunday paper. Shortly after the AZ Republic notified us they would GIVE us the rest of the week for free. We called them back and told them not to litter our driveway with it. :)
I was in Phoenix for the weekend back in ‘97. I read one copy of that rag. That was plenty for me.
I’m really glad your wife saves all that money.
After watching the crap that the regime that “news”paper supports is putting on my kids and grandkids, I have determined that I am at war with the whole bunch of ‘em.
Do what you think is right, but I’m not taking any half measures. Or prisoners.
Glad to see that there are so many people who feel the same way I do about the Arizona Repugnant. In the 70’s it was a great newspaper but has been reaching for the bottom ever since.
It’s really a shame though, that so many still march blindly and robot-like to the polls with its slate clutched in their cold dead hands.
I don’t know. It could be worse — the Repugnant could fold and then the only Valley-wide news publication we have would be the New Times.
So how much will the court cost go up on a 20 dollar speeding ticket 80-100 bucks for the court costs?
It is disturbing reading many of the editorials and op-eds in this newspaper about Sheriff Arpaio and County Attorney Andrew Thomas's attempts to prosecute Supervisors Stapley and Wilcox and investigate the Court Tower. The writers rush to judgment accusing Arpaio and Thomas of unethical behavior, without knowing the full facts. Only Arpaio and Thomas have seen the results of the investigations, search warrants and subpoenas... The public has a right to be skeptical of a $341 million state of the art, luxury Court Tower being built during a recession, while county agencies, including law enforcement, are forced to cut 15% of their budgets by laying off employees. With the exception of columnist Laurie Roberts, this newspaper has failed to ask the hard questions, and even her questions have gone unanswered. Why is this luxury tower being built even though the county cannot afford it?Thanks Fenix Guy.
Is that really so outlandish? Who has enough money to do that?
Think about it. We are always assuming ideology and bias, and there's plenty of that...but what would buy this kind of stubborn refusal better than cash? Somebody's paying somebody off.
They will never write anything good about JD Hayworth either. In fact they campaign against him.
What have always found interesting (regardless of how one might feel about “Sheriff Joe”) is that a county sheriff has great power. Modern usage in the media and pop usage just tends to conflate the police department and the sheriff department, but they are two totally different critters.
The Arizona Republic was once a highly regarded conservative newspaper. WTF happened to it and to Arizona (Napolitano the Clueless)?
Arizona taxpayers owed $1 billion from illegal immigration
http://www.kvoa.com/news/arizona-taxpayers-owed-1-billion-from-illegal-immigration/
The cost of illegal immigration has exhausted the Arizona State Treasury. In order to pay for the federal government’s responsibility of securing our national borders and incarcerating individuals who enter the United States illegally and commit crimes, the state has incurred hundreds of millions of dollars of debt to pay these bills,” said Treasurer Dean Martin.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.