Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia and US 'agree to nuclear deal'
Times on Line ^ | 2/3/10 | Giles Whittell in Washington

Posted on 02/02/2010 8:09:24 PM PST by Nachum

The US and Russia have agreed in principle on a deal to replace the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (Start) that expired in December after 15 years as the centerpiece of nuclear arms control, the Wall Street Journal reports today.

The deal, which officials said could be ready to sign in two months, would cut each side’s nuclear arsenal to between 1,500 and 1,675 operationally deployed warheads — down from 2,200 on the American side and 2,800 in Russia, which has also kept an unknown number in reserve.

Both countries would also commit to deeper cuts in the number of operational launch vehicles, whether missiles, submarines or aircraft. The total number would be limited to between 700 and 800 on each side. “There may be finessing and fine-turning, but the issues, from our perspective, are all addressed,” a US official said. Chief among these issues was Russian resistance to international inspections of its launch sites and a proposal for both powers to share missile test data.

(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: agree; deal; nuclear; russia

1 posted on 02/02/2010 8:09:24 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping


2 posted on 02/02/2010 8:10:06 PM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; All
"Total nuclear disarmament", Obama, Russia and the commie left
various sources

Posted on Sunday, July 05, 2009 12:51:21 PM ET by ETL:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2285983/posts

3 posted on 02/02/2010 8:14:55 PM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This approaches treason.


4 posted on 02/02/2010 8:15:43 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Russia, which has also kept an unknown number in reserve

That says it all. No agreement is worth anything at all beyond reducing American armament.

5 posted on 02/02/2010 8:23:27 PM PST by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

What’s the difference between “Operationally Deployable” warheads and those “in Reserve”? Sounds like a fast-shuffle to me.


6 posted on 02/02/2010 8:23:31 PM PST by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
What’s the difference between “Operationally Deployable” warheads and those “in Reserve”?

Could mean a lot of things. Often the same "physics package" is used in different warheads or bombs. If the physics package is not installed in a bomb or warhead, it would not be operationally deployable, although it could be made so fairly quickly. At a lower level, the device itself is made up of various components, and if those are not assembled into a device, again it's not operationally deployable, and in this case would take longer to assemble into a device and then a weapon. At a hihger level, it doesn't help much to have a warhead, but no missile to put it on. With bombers it's bit more complex, since conventional "bombers", and even fighters, can carry nukes, if you have the nukes.

The thought of F-117s with nukes scared the snot out of the Kremlin, and likely the Chinese too. You could do a decapitation (go for leadership and command facilities) and they'd have zero warning, assuming they could not see the -117s coming. And they could never be sure which F-117s, if any, had nukes.

But as always, the devil is in the details, and we rarely get to see those until after the deed is done.

7 posted on 02/02/2010 8:34:50 PM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
Reagan had it right about the Russians. "Trust but verify." These thugs have never cut an honest deal in their lives.
8 posted on 02/02/2010 9:14:24 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson