Posted on 02/02/2010 2:47:21 PM PST by RED SOUTH
Someone please, PALEEZE get a photo of Sarah in Harry Reid's backyard!
Not sure I understand, are you saying NON of those listed are supporting McLame or ALL listed are supporting McLame?
Call me dumb, but I dont understand your post, I am not a mind reader.
Support means supporting to the END, not a one night stop over in AZ to square a deal. Sarah is squaring with McClame, thats all...
SOrry , you don’t have to be a mind reader, just a reader. Maybe it’s a bit clearer without the names.
Can anyone of you troll morons name me one prominent Republican (you know, one that has at least a slight chance to win the 2012 nomination) who is not supporting McCain in the AZ primary?
Au contrare, mon ami. I read the article, from several sources. I’m just not naive.
If what she says is true, why wouldn’t the fee go straight to those charities, or failing that, why wouldn’t she provide some accounting thereof? You do realize, don’t you, that this would be the most effective way to go with it, right? Running the fee through her bank account means she is tax-liable for the income. Even if she donated the whole lot to charity, her tax liability is still more than if she simply had them donate that amount straight to the charities.
For the record, I’m no Dem troll. I have no dog in the race. Likewise, I don’t simply take a person’s word for things either. You can believe what you want, as I know you will and do, but do not presume to think that because Sarah said so, it is so.
sorry, still dont understand, does your list support mclame or not? All I am asking because I dont know the answer.
Yes , they all support McCain, according to the person who originally posed the question.
Thanks, I was worried about that. I understand political reality just fine. We are watching political reality destroy our country. I don’t have to like it.
Yeah, because capitalism and money are, like, you know, evil. /sarc
Your screen name fits you well.
- JP
You mean like her support for gay rights in Alaska?
AMEN
For $100,000. If stories be true.
We agree!
She is not running the money through her account...why don’t you go read more info before you say something, you obviously got caught reading the excerpts and assume she didn’t say anything about it, but you keep tripping up and getting in trouble, stop.
So we are to sit by and just accept that “political reality”? AS the country crumbles when do you think it would be a good time to not accept the reality politicians have made?
OK, LOL, you go on believing.
I’ve read the quoted article by Sarah, plus other articles about the event, including by the organizers. The speaking fee will be paid to her. She ‘says’ she will then turn around and distribute the amount to charities (well, she originally said it would be to candidates, but, you know...). There is no way for her to do so without running it through her account.
But anyway, keep on keeping on, my friend. She’s counting on you.
I agree. We keep making the same mistakes election after election.
Stoop or stump? Perhaps you meant stump.
I think she gave a big clue in this article as to why she has declared support for Mclame:
“I thought long and hard about my participation in this weekend’s event. At the end of the day, my decision came down to this: It’s important to keep faith with people who put a little bit of their faith in you.”
I’m seriously thinking about driving over there for this, can’t imagine where they will put a crowd in Searchlight though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.